The Inapplicability of Torah–Part 3 of Where There is no Law There is no Transgression

This is “The Inapplicability of Torah.” It is the final installment to our 3-part series within a series entitled “Where There is no Law There is no Transgression.”

Because I have so much content to cover today and I’m led to bring this series within a series to a close, I will only encourage you to, if you’ve not had the opportunity to listen to or read, Parts 1 and 2 in order to be familiar with some of what we’re going to cover today. Therefore, I will not rehash/review those installments. But rather, we will pick-up today where we left off in part-2 and bring this installment to a practical conclusion.

Our focus passage remains Romans 4:9-15, with particular attention paid to verse 15.

The Torah-Faith-Righteousness Connection

Shaul’s ultimate goal in our focus passage is to appeal to his Roman Messianic readers to choose righteousness that is derived from a trusting, obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah, and to reject the so-called righteousness that they once believed came only through their Jewishness—their oral and written Torah; their circumcision; their heritage and culture. They erroneously believed that their reliance on Torah for their justification made them favorable to Yah while their Gentile counterparts’ lack of Jewishness made them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment. (We discuss in a series within a series this ideal of one’s eternal security resting upon one’s Jewishness. If you’ve not already read or listened to that series, I would humbly encourage you to do so if you’re so led.). And it was this erroneous belief that Shaul set out to refute in this portion of his letter.

Being Under the Law

When Torah is introduced to an individual in one form or another, violations of it, along with the prescribed punishment for violations of its commandments (I.e., the invoking of Yah’s righteous wrath) will bring that person “under the law”. That is, the one who possesses (I.e., possesses knowledge of Torah) is subject to Yah’s righteous wrath and judgment unless he or she enters into a faithful-obedient covenant relationship with Yah through a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

Conversely, if an individual remains ignorant and devoid of any knowledge or possession of Torah, they are not subject to or “under the law.” But rather, these individuals are subject to Yah’s “natural moral laws” which any transgression thereof makes him/her subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment (Romans 1). And just as in the case of the one who is “under the law”, his or her only escape is by entering into a faithful-obedient covenant relationship with Yah through Yahoshua.

Final Work-up to our Focus Verse: An Examination of Romans 4:9-14

With that said, it’s now time to do a final work-up and examination of our focus passage of Romans 4:9-14 and a final explanation of our focus verse of Romans 4:15.

Romans 4:9-10

(9) Is this blessedness (that being the covenant blessings and promises) then for the circumcision or also for the uncircumcision? For we say, “faith was credited to Avraham as righteousness.” How then was it credited to him? Was he circumcised at the time, or not? No, he was not circumcised but uncircumcised (NET).

Shaul brings into question the truth or wisdom of one’s justification being a byproduct of one’s Jewishness, or rather, one’s circumcised, proselyte status. Was justification or the righteousness of Yah exclusive to the Jew? Or, was justification or righteousness inclusive of the non-Jews or the nations of the world?

In a sense, this verse is a continuation of the rhetorical argument the apostle posed to his Roman Messianic Jewish readers back in chapter 3. (We covered this rhetorical argument in detail in our discussion entitled “A Question of One’s Jewishness”.) And in order for us to accurately interpret and understand the point that the apostle is trying to convey here, we must take our focus passage and verse within the contextual framework of this letter, from chapter one all the way up to this passage. For what we have here before us is, in a broad sense, is a refutation of the actions and philosophy of the Judaizers or Influencers who were bent on forcing incoming believing Gentiles to convert to Judaism. And the issue that Paul had regarding this issue was not that converting to Judaism was a sin or a bad thing. But rather, the issue at hand was the religious—the spiritual—emphasis that the Judaizers/Influencers placed on a Gentile’s conversion to Judaism. As far as the Judaizers/Influencers were concerned, conversion to Judaism was a “salvific.” The coerced conversion of incoming believing Gentiles would cause those who went through with the conversion and undertook the rite of physical circumcision to place their eternal security, not in a covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe, but rather in their pending Jewish status; what would ultimately become their Jewishness. Thus, as Shaul critically saw it, the bedrock of the Messianic Faith, which is that of a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah would become null and void. Which would mean that their eternal security would be imperil.

Recall that we embarked on that series within a series entitled “A Question of One’s Jewishness” where we discussed the first-century religious Jewish mindset that held to the erroneous belief that one’s salvation and admittance into the congregation of Yisra’el was based entirely upon one’s Jewishness. And one’s Jewishness consisted of one’s Jewish heritage, biology, physical circumcised state, adherence to the written and oral laws/Torahs, and such. And last installment to this series within a series (The Role of Torah in the World) we discussed how one was deemed righteous only as a result of their adherence to Jewish sect-specific halachah—that is, adhering to a specific Jewish sect’s laws, traditions, and rules. Which meant that according to the Judaizers/Influencers of the Roman Messianic Assemblies, only those who were proselytized into their Jewish Messianic Sect through physical circumcision could (1) be admitted as members of their Messianic Assembly, and (2) be saved or be admitted into the Kingdom of Elohim. In other words: No Proselytized Gentiles Allowed. Salvation and Righteousness belonged exclusively to the religious Jew.

Evidence of this erroneous mindset is found in certain medieval midrashic writings such as Pesikta Rabbati 45 (185b). Midrash, by the way, is a genre of rabbinic literature that contains Jewish Biblical exegesis (critical interpretation of Hebrew texts), hermeneutics (interpretation of biblical passages), and compilations of homilies (rabbinic commentaries that follow a prescribed reading of a Hebrew text).

The irony in this is that Yah never made any such stipulation that one’s righteousness was derived from one’s adherence to a sect’s set of established traditions, laws, and rules; for that matter, one’s Jewishness. The fact remains that Yah reckons one righteous based solely upon his or her trusting Faith in Him. And so it is that we find here in our focus passage work-up of verses 9 and 10 Shaul making the case that no Gentile need become a proselyte in order to be forgiven their sins and to be reckoned righteous before the Creator of the Universe, which of course was contrary to first-century Jewish conventional wisdom. And to prove his point, the apostle to the Gentiles draws upon the life-example of Avraham, whom Shaul points out was deemed righteous by Yah before he was physically circumcised.

I would add to the understanding and proof of this paradigm (that is of Avraham’s faith-producing righteousness coming before his obedience), that one may view the Feasts of Yah from the perspective of a convert’s spiritual journey. Pesach is emblematic of our Master Yahoshua’s atoning sacrifice and ministry that makes our entering a faith-based covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe possible. And then, emblematic of the 7-day long Feast of Unleavened Bread (aka Chag HaMatzot), we begin and engage in the lifelong justification process—or rather becoming saved and being made righteous–which involves developing and maintaining a trusting-faithful relationship with Yehovah. In this portion of the journey, we are being saved; we are being justified and reckoned righteous before a holy and just God. We learn what it means to trust Father and reap the spiritual benefits of being in an intimate relationship with the Creator. Then Shavuot/Pentecost, where Yah’s precious Holy Spirit (I.e., His Ruach HaKodesh) begins to inscribe His Torah on the fleshly tablets of our hearts. In this portion of the journey, we begin to walk obediently in Yah’s Ways—His Torah—His instructions in righteousness—His lively oracles. And our obedience is facilitated by the work of the Holy Spirit/Ruach HaKodesh.

So, all in all, if we view this journey from the perspective of the Feasts of Yah, we see that obedience always follow faith and being reckoned righteous, which is consistent with Avraham’s journey and experience. Like Avraham, one enters the process of being justified and saved on the basis of his or her faith in advance of being Torah observant. And this being the case, logically speaking, the covenant blessings would not be exclusive to faithful and obedient Jews, but accessible to Gentiles as well.

Romans 4:11

And he (Avraham) received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised, so that he would become the father of all those who believe but have never been circumcised, that they too could have righteousness credited to them (NET).

Every English translation of verse 11 has Shaul referring to Avraham’s physical circumcision as “a sign” of the covenant relationship he enjoyed with the Creator of the Universe. More so, according to Shaul, the sign or mark of the physical circumcision was intended by Yah to serve as a reminder of the ultimate covenant promise of “Avraham’s seed blessing the nations—blessing the families of the earth (Genesis/Beresheit 12:3; 18:18; 22:18; 26:4; 28:14). And of course, this blessing of the families or nations of the earth is none other than the Person and Ministry of our Master Yahoshua Messiah.

Beloved: the premise of, or as commentator Tim Hegg refers to it, physical circumcision, was that it was a sign of the “essence” of the Avrahamic covenant, which is where the Original Covenant brilliantly intersects and builds upon the Renewed Covenant.

Messianic Jewish thinking attaches specific spiritual importance to physical circumcision being applied to the male organ of procreation and the promise that in Avraham’s seed (that is, the Hebrew nation and ultimately the Yahoshua Messiah) all the nations or families of the earth would be blessed. Why? Because this points directly to the promised Son of the Covenant: Yeshua HaMashiyach.

Beyond this such thinking, the act of receiving physical circumcision was intended to be an outward sign of one’s trusting Faith in the Elohim of Yisra’el. It was never meant to be a fraternal emblem of one’s Jewishness. It was meant to be an outward show of one’s trusting covenant relationship with the Elohim of Avraham, Yitschaq, and Ya’achov.

For as Shaul attempted to convey to his Roman Messianic Jewish readers, Avraham’s trusting faith came many years before he and his household received the sign and seal of physical circumcision. And for Avraham to go through the ritual of physical circumcision, it would be a sign or mark of his trusting Faith in Yah and dedication to the Way of Life that Yah instructed him to walk in. And so for us today, obedience naturally flows from a trusting faith in the Creator of the Universe, through the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

From Avraham’s life story we see how his trusting faith in Yah led to him receiving the covenant promises. However, when Avraham’s faith was lacking and he instead placed his trust and faith in the ways of the flesh, as brilliantly seen in the Hagar incident, the outcome was not at all consistent with the covenant promises of Yah. The outcome of Avraham’s momentary, misguided trust in the ways of the flesh, prompted Avraham to return to that legendary trusting faith in the Creator of the Universe.

So here, Shaul puts forth the understanding that since Avraham walked in faith well before he received the mark of circumcision that proved his faith producing righteousness, that he (Avraham) became the “father of faith” or the “father of the faithful.” He is the father of those physically circumcised Jews who possess a trusting faith in Yah through Yahoshua Messiah. As well as he is the father of those who have not been led to receive physical circumcision, but who have a trusting faith in Yah through Yeshua Messiah. For the fact stands that Avraham set the example of faith for his seed—both circumcised and uncircumcised—to follow. And within that paradigm of being a seed of Avraham through faith, one is reckoned righteous by the court of heaven.

Romans 4:12

And he is also the father of the circumcised, who are not only circumcised, but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised (NET).

The Apostle’s emphasis here is on the pre-circumcised faith of Avraham. This is the form and intensity of faith that Yah is calling for in terms of a would-be child of His. That child being of either the circumcision (I.e., a believing orthodox Jew) or an uncircumcised believing non-Jew/Gentile.

Now, it should go without saying that Avraham did in fact become the father of the biological, cultural, orthodox and religious Jew of this world. These are those who Shaul referred to as being of the circumcision.

However, more so, Avraham is also the father of the believing, circumcised, Messianic Jew as well as the believing, uncircumcised Gentile. In short, in accordance with the covenant that Yah made with him, Avraham became the father of the faithful as well as what some would refer to as the Jewish nation, by virtue of his trusting Faith in the Creator of the Universe.

However, as much as the apostle cherished his kinsmen, he recognized that the decisive factor that Shaul is addressing here is faith. Not circumcision or sect-specific halachah.

Let us not fall for the false impression that many within and outside our Faith Communities have: That physical circumcision has for all intents and purposes been done away and replaced by circumcision of the heart. Shaul meant no such thing here. The apostle’s emphasis, rather, was on the proper, as J.K. McKee so astutely puts it, “…sequence of events in the Torah would have it—secondarily to his (I.e., Avraham’s faith) in Yah” (”Romans for the practical Messianic,” pg. 106). In other words, physical circumcision must be viewed and treated as “a subsequent and external seal of that righteous status which Avraham already possessed as Yah’s free gift; it neither created nor enhanced that righteous status” (ibn; pg. 106). (We discussed the relevance of physical circumcision to Yah’s called out ones in Part 3 of our “A Question of One’s Jewishness” series within a series.) For as in Avraham’s case, physical circumcision is meant as “an outward and visible attestation of the status of righteousness (the byproduct of a trusting faithful covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe) which he (Avraham) already possessed” (Ibn., pg. 107). One must first enter into and remain in a trusting faithful covenant relationship with Yah, and then, if so led by Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh, receive the mark of physical circumcision as a testimony or mark of one’s faithful covenant relationship. Bottom line beloved, physical circumcision or Torah-keeping as a whole, again as in the case of Avraham, must always come after righteousness that is conferred as a result of one’s trusting faith.

 

Romans 4:13

For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through the law, but through the righteousness that comes by faith (NET).

The covenant promises were linked exclusively to Avraham’s faith. Consequently, our being partakers and inheritors of those same covenant promises (I.e., our being heirs of the commonwealth of Yisra’el) is linked exclusively to our trusting faith in Yah through Yahoshua Messiah. To link one’s inheritance of the covenant promises to one’s halachah and or keeping of Torah/Law is to deny the truth of Scripture. For the covenant promise existed well before Torah was gifted to us at Mount Sinai. Avraham’s righteousness was inextricably linked to the Promised Son Yitschaq (aka Isaac)—His seed—his covenant promised descendants (that being the nation of Yisrael), but more so, to The Seed. The Seed that would crush the head of the serpent and bring humanity back to a true and substantive relationship with Yah and usher in Yah’s eternal Kingdom here on earth. Of this Yahoshua our Master said that “father Avraham was overjoyed to see [His] day, he saw it, and was glad” (John 8:56; NET).

According to the apostle, it is the restoration of all things that were taken from us by the enemy (I.e., the covenant promises in its grandest revelation) that will be inherited by those that enter and remain in a trusting, faithful covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe through Yahoshua Messiah:

(21) So then, no more boasting about mere mortals! For everything belongs to you, (22) whether Shaul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future. Everything belongs to you (you, being the faithful Corinthian who is in covenant with Yah), (23) and you belong to Mashiyach, and Mashiyach belongs to Yah (1 Corinthians 3; NET modified).

In other words, beloved, we who are in a trusting, faithful relationship with Yah through Yahoshua, are heirs of Avraham, who himself received the promise of inheriting the whole world. Thus, we stand to inherit everything as well. And like Avraham, this promise of inheriting the world is not achieved through sect-specific halachah, or for that matter, simple Torah-keeping. But rather, through the righteousness that comes by way of our Trusting Faith.

Many in Judaism and in sectors of our Faith Community will argue, citing passages such as Genesis/Beresheit 26:2-5, that Avraham’s obedience resulted in him receiving the blessings of the covenant promises, which may in and of itself seem contradictory to all that we’ve been talking about here as it relates to faith coming before obedience.

But the truth of the matter is this: Indeed, as the passage declares, Yitschaq received Yah’s divine protection and blessings; his seed received possession of the Land of Canaan and his descendants made as numerous as the stars; and the Messiah would come through his line because Avraham obeyed Yah and “kept Yah’s commandments, statutes and laws” (Genesis 26:5).

But let’s not be confused here. It was Avraham’s trusting faith in Yah that netted Him Yah’s righteousness and friend-status and compelled his obedience. Avraham’s faith came first, followed by his obedience.

A proper interpretation of “For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through the law/Torah” should simply be that Yah’s instructions in righteousness were never meant or intended to save anyone. But rather, salvation and righteousness came to Avraham in accordance with his trusting faith alone, which compelled him to be obedient to Yah’s instructions; all of which pleased Yah and brought about the covenant promises which we are engrafted heirs to. For faith comes first then obedience. And so, as the half-brother of our Master so elegantly wrote, without obedience, one’s faith is dead; and without works, one’s faith is dead as well (James 2).

Romans 4:14

For if they (religious, unbelieving Jews) become heirs by the law, faith is empty and the promise (that being the covenant promises) is nullified (NET).

Those who have been in our faith community any appreciable length of time would know of individuals who have placed all their spiritual eggs or marbles into Torah-keeping (both written and oral). In fact, one would rarely if ever hear a word about faith come out of their mouths. These want so much to look and act Jewish that they abandon and or avoid any talk or teaching having to do with faith. Unfortunately, this obsession and misplaced focus (that is, of Torah-Torah-Torah) nwill not lead one to righteousness nor salvation.

When Yah made the covenant promises to Avraham, He did not condition those promises on Avraham being circumcised or on him being Torah-observant. But rather, those covenant promises were made to Avraham by virtue of Yah making a unilateral promise to Avraham and to his seed. And all that Avraham would need do to receive those covenant promises was to simply trust Yah.

Conversely, and hypothetically speaking, if Yah would have commanded Avraham to be circumcised and instructed to keep His Torah and then receive the covenant blessings—which He did not—but if Yah would have orchestrated events as such, then there’d be no need for Avraham to have a trusting, faithful relationship with the Almighty in order to inherit those covenant blessings.

It’s sort of akin to one going to the store, picking up an item that you desire, going up to the counter, paying for it, and then walking out of the store with that desired item in your hands. You just completed a financial transaction: You received goods or even a service in exchange for your obedience: You followed a procedure of paying for the item(s) you wanted, and then you received the desired items.

However, if that same item you wanted was promised to be given to you or gifted to you by someone (assuming with no strings attached), all you needed to do to receive that item was to simply wait and trust that person to eventually get it to you.

If you decided to not wait to receive that item, but instead went to the store and purchased the item yourself, you would have in principle voided the promise of being given that desired item.

Let’s look at the example of Avraham again. Avraham was promised of Yah a son who would be his heir. Years passed after Yah made the promise of a son to Avraham and Avraham got antsy because he and Sarah had gone pass their childbearing years without having that promised heir or son. So what did the couple do? Well, the couple rationalized that in order to bring forth the promise of an heir/son, Sarah, who was barren at the time, would have to put forth a substitute or surrogate to bring Avraham’s heir into the world. And in Sarah offering her handmaid Hagar to Avraham for purposes of forcing the promise of an heir, Avraham shifted his Trust in Yah (I.e., he essentially voided his faith in Yah) to that of the flesh—the carnal. Avraham trusted that Hagar would successfully bear him a son and heir and through her the covenant promise of an heir would be fulfilled.

Hagar, consequently, did bear Avraham a son—Ishmael, unfortunately to much turmoil and family/household strife. But the reality is that Hagar did not bear Avraham the covenant promised heir. Abba instead had to correct Avraham’s error and get him back on track of trusting Him for the promised heir of the covenant.

You see, Yah was about doing the heavy lifting here and He alone bringing about the covenant promises to Avraham and his seed. All Avraham had to do was trust that Yah would bring about that which He’d promised. Avraham’s trust in Yah merited him Yah’s righteousness and Avraham’s trusting covenant relationship with Yah also merited Him friendship status with Yah (Genesis/Beresheit 15:6; cf. James/Ya’achov 2:23).

And it is this trusting faith in Yah—this reliance on Yah doing the heavy lifting for us—that will ultimately bring us into a justified state before Yah and ultimately entry into the Kingdom of Yah. In response to our trusting, faithful relationship with Yah, we are compelled to walk in His Ways because we love our Heavenly Father and we want to please Him. And most importantly, we are obedient because we realize it is the absolute right thing to do.

 

Making Sense of Romans 4:15

For Torah is a worker of wrath: Because where no instruction is, there is no transgression of Torah.

In his commentary, Andrew Gabriel Roth, editor and interpreter of the AENT, rightly interprets this verse from the perspective of where there is no Torah provision against an action, then there is no transgression. Essentially, Shaul was making here a rhetorical statement to his religious Messianic Jewish readers.

Contrary to the anti-Torah rhetoric of denominationalists who use this verse as one of their proof-passages, the apostle appears to be saying rather, that “wherever Torah is not being taught, people will do what is right in their own eyes…” Which is pretty much true. Because the world rejects Yah and His ways. And it is this unconverted human attitude that Shaul asserts makes them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment outside the framework of Torah (Romans 1).

So, with this understanding in mind, we as Yah’s set-apart people should recognize that Torah was never meant to be OUR condemnatory instrument or weapon to beat unbelieving humanity about their heads: Not by Yah, nor by Yah’s set-apart people against others.

The religious Jew of Shaul’s day believed that by virtue of him being a steward of Yah’s oracles—Yah’s Torah—and their Jewishness, that they were justified/made righteous before a holy and righteous Elohim. And therefore they believed themselves superior to their Gentile counterparts in the eyes of Elohim. Thus, they proudly stood in judgment against and condemnation of the Gentile.

In response to this erroneous notion, Shaul, here and in other areas of this same letter, was simply pointing out to his readers that all have sinned—both Jew and Gentile alike—and have fallen short of Yah’s glorious standards of righteous living (Romans 3:23). Therefore, all who have not placed their faith/trust in the Person and Ministries of Yahoshua Messiah will be subject to Yah’s righteous wrath. Those who are so-called people of the Book (I.e., Catholics, Denominationalists, Jews, Messianics, etc.) will be judged within the framework of Torah because of their transgressions against Yah’s Torah, while those outside of any understanding of Torah will be judged outside the framework of Torah (Romans 1:18-2:6). (We discuss what this all means in our series within a series “Being Under the Law.” And if you’ve not had the opportunity to read or listen to any of those posts, we humble encourage you to do so as you are so led.)

So, we who have the mind of Messiah must keep Torah in a proper perspective. First must come faith in the Person and Ministry of Yeshua Messiah. That which flows from a Trusting Faith, as seen in the example and life of Avraham, is obedience to Yah’s instructions in righteousness—Yah’s written Torah.

You see, Yah never intended for Torah to be the instrument by which we are justified before Him. But rather, Torah serves as a decipher or identifier of sin and the penalties that are associated with incidents of sin. It applies only to Yah’s chosen ones as well as those who have knowledge or possession of it. It does not apply to those who have no knowledge of Yah and His Ways/instructions in righteousness.

Therefore, it should be clear to any with eyes to see and ears to hear that Yah’s people are held to a higher standard than people of the world. Why? Because we know better. We know Yah’s ways and His Will. We have no excuse for living outside Yah’s Ways and His Will. Thus, those who possess knowledge of Yah’s Torah who are not in a trusting, obedient covenant relationship with the Almighty through the Person and Ministry of Yeshua, are subject to the wrath of Yah; the penalties of Torah which is death and ultimately eternal separation from Yah.

So, when it comes to us having to deal with others who may not have an understanding of Torah as we do, we have to be patient, loving, and show understanding towards them. They are lacking in understanding. They’ve not entered into the journey that we have been called to. Or maybe they have entered the journey we’ve been called to, but they are not at the same place that we are in our journey. Thus, it falls to us to recognize that and be available to any who may seek our knowledge and understanding.

And so, we cannot judge or condemn folks on their keeping or lack of Torah keeping/living.

Paul’s Righteous Perspective Laid Out

Shaul attempted to put into proper perspective the realities of Torah in relation to the circumcised believing and non-believing Jew, as well as the believing and non-believing uncircumcised Gentile.

The way the apostle saw it, and I absolutely agree with his assessment, was that the believing Gentiles that had begun streaming into the Roman Messianic Assemblies would not have any true knowledge of Torah. Thus, they would not have been subject to the stipulations of Torah since they could not have possibly transgressed that which was not part of their knowledge base and life. Consequently, the Roman Judaizers/Influencers had no ground upon which to judge the so-called Gentile transgressors of Torah nor consider them common or unclean.

This hearkens back to the true meaning of the vision that the Apostle Shimon Keefa (aka Peter) had on that rooftop in Joppa just before Yahoshua sent him to witness and evangelize the Roman Centurion Cornelius. Upon entering Cornelius’ home, Keefa—Peter—tells Cornelius:

“…You know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile, yet Yah has shown me that I should call no person defiled or ritually unclean” (Acts 10:28; NET modified).

The erroneous mindset of the religious Jew towards any and all Gentiles in Shaul’s day was that they were inherently defiled and ritually unclean—violators of Torah. This of course was derived from a manipulation and misinterpretation of the Written Torah by way of their Oral Traditions and teachings. For the Oral Tradition taught that because Gentiles were inherently idolaters, they must be avoided by any and all Torah-observant Jews. (We spoke about this earlier in this post.)

But the truth of the matter is that Father Yah did not see the Gentile as such. He saw them just as He saw the Jew: sinners worthy of righteous wrath and judgment. But Yah also saw the Gentile, as He also saw the Jew: sinners worthy of saving and adopting as His beloved children. And so Abba has never been a respecter or person as the religious Jew of Shaul’s day erroneously believed (Deuteronomy/Devarim 10:17; 2 Chronicles 19:7; Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 3:25; 1 Peter 1:17).

And so, it seems that we find here, in our focus passage, Shaul conveying to his Roman readers, that any and all thoughts of trying to clean-up the Gentiles through proselytizing them—converting them to Judaism—was fool-hearty. They (the converted, faithful, uncircumcised Gentiles) were not condemned by their Torahs, for Torah did not apply to them during their pre-conversion lives. Thus the converted Gentiles were not to be viewed, judged, nor condemned as transgressors or violators of Torah since the Torah was not known to them.

But rather, the faithless Jew stood subject to Torah because he/she were transgressors of the very instrument they condemned the Gentile with. Their lack or refusal to place their trusting faith in Yah through the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua, made them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment.

And this was the perspective and general understanding of our focus passage and verse.

Practical Messianic Halachah Application of our Focus Passage and Verse

From a practical Messianic Halachah standpoint, our focus passage should serve as a reminder for us to keep Torah in its proper perspective in our walk in Mashiyach. To not stand in condemnation against those who may not understand Yah’s Way of life the way we do or who may despise our way of life. But rather, let us love the foreigner and those who are afar off from Yah’s Covenant promises, knowing that Yah is no respecter of person and that He is calling not just the circumcised religious Jew to salvation and a covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe through Yahoshua our Messiah, but also the nation peoples of the world (Ephesians 2:13-17).

So then, it falls to us, as Yah’s chosen ones, to first and foremost walk in faith as the apostle so aptly counseled us to “walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised” (Romans 4:12; NET). That walking in the footsteps of the faith that Avraham possessed even before he was circumcised in short is our coming into covenant relationship with Father Yah through a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua. And because of our trusting faith and our close abiding relationship with Yah, we will joyfully keep His instructions in righteousness. And in our obedience of faith we conform to the very image of our Master and we love the foreigner (I.e., those who do not possess Torah or who do not identify with our Way of Life) just as we love one another in our Faith Community (Leviticus 19:34).

 

Biblical Illiteracy Behind the Anti-Hebrew Roots Agenda

Is Biblical Illiteracy behind the Anti-Hebrew Roots Agenda these days. In this post I reflect upon a recent experience I had on Facebook that suggested to me that Biblical Illiteracy may, in part, be behind the animus Christians have towards our Hebrew Roots/Messianic...

read more

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

read more

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

read more

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

read more

Where There is no Law There is no Transgression-Part 2-The Role of Torah in the World

Quick Review of Part 1

 

  1. Our focus passage was Romans 4:11-15 with particular emphasis on verse 15: For Torah brings wrath, because where there is no law there is no transgression [of the law]. Unfortunately, denominationalists erroneously use this and related Pauline passages as their anti-Torah proof passages.

 

  1. We highlighted the denominationalists’ erroneous claims that no one is capable of keeping or walking out Torah blamelessly—what the rabbis have enumerated as 613 Torah Commandments (correction from last installment)–that is, one not being prone to violating Yah’s commandments, especially in contrast to those outside of our faith and the wicked of this world–despite biblical statements to the contrary. All the while no one doubts he or she can be a law-abiding U.S. citizen without transgressing any of the 100’s of 100,000’s of federal, state, and municipal laws on the books of this nation.

 

Of Zechariah and Elisheva—Yochanan the Immerser’s parents–Luke wrote:

 

They were both righteous in the sight of Yah, following all the commandments and ordinances of Yah blamelessly (Luke 1:6).

 

And excuse my oversight in not mentioning this key passage in that installment, but Father Yah Himself asserted that we can indeed keep Torah blamelessly:

 

(11) This commandment I am giving you today is not too difficult for you, nor is it too remote. (12) It is not in heaven, as though one must say, “Who will go up to heaven to get it for us and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?”(13) And it is not across the sea, as though one must say, “Who will cross over to the other side of the sea and get it for us and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” (14) For the thing is very near you—it is in your mouth and in your mind so that you can do it (Deu. 30:11-14; NET). 

 

The Yerushalayim Targum (an ancient commentary of the Hebrew Scriptures) expresses in particular verse 14 as:

 

For the word is very nigh you, in your mouth, that you may meditate upon it, and in your hearts, that you may perform it. See, behold, I have set before you this day the way of life, which is the path of the good, and the way of death, which is the path of the evil.

 

And so, it turns out that it was not a question in the first-century Torah-keepers’ minds that they could walk-out Torah perfectly. Such thinking is denominationalist misdirecting and misinterpretation of the true context of what walking Torah blamelessly or perfectly means. But rather, it was the understanding that one MUST “abide”, “dwell”; walk in Torah as an uncompromising lifestyle. And truth be told, regardless of what lifestyle humans choose to live out, they can never maintain without incidents of failure or error. Humans are by nature prone to mess up. We error in every aspect of our lives: Areas within and outside our faith. And Yah realizes this basic fact.

 

So then, as it relates to our being able to walk-out Torah blamelessly, if one were to stumble in their walking out of Torah, they were to follow the prescribed provisions for atonement. Before Yeshua, the would-be Torah-keeper would follow the prescribed provisions in Torah to atone for their transgressions. Coupled with following those atonement provisions (sanctioned sacrifices), the offender had to present those atonement provisions having a contrite and humble spirit and broken heart, enjoined by a sincere repentance and a desperate seeking of forgiveness by Yah.

 

  1. We cited the likely reason for such widespread acceptance in the belief that no one can keep Torah perfectly as having to do with a misunderstanding or a lack of understanding and distinction between the concepts of “sin” and “transgression of the Law”. Although the two concepts are connected in fundamental ways, there is also a distinction between the two.

 

 

Today, I want us to examine some key concepts that I believe will put us in the best position to properly interpret what Shaul meant by “Where there is no law, there is no transgression.” And those concepts are (1) understanding the apostle’s use of the term law, aka “nomos”; (2) the phrase “works of the law” that Shaul uses once in Romans 9 and 4 times in Galatians; (3) the role of Torah in the lives of Yah’s chosen ones and in the lives of those who have no knowledge of Torah.

 

 

Nomos (I.e., The Law) in the Brit HaDashah—An Issue of Discernment

 

As crazy as it may sound to many of us who are sensitive to the things that are contained in the Oral Tradition—the Talmud and Mishnah and such—that which is attributed to the so-called Jewish sages—the first-century A.D. religious Jew steadfastly viewed the Oral Torah to be equal to, if not greater in some respects, to the Written Torah, popularly referred to as the Law of Moses. For the “Oral Law/Torah/Tradition” specified for the observant Jew, the proper manner in which one kept or walked out the “Written Torah.” Some have described the “Oral Law/Torah” as the essential “fence around” the “Written Torah” or the “Law of Moses.” In many observant Jewish minds (both ancient and modern), the Oral and the Written served as sort of a “unified whole”. They were indiscernible. They were inseparable.

 

So, when one is studying the apostolic writings, it behooves the spiritually discerning Messianic Truth-seeker to carefully discern which Torah (oral, written, or both) the Greek term “nomos” (in the English, “law”) is specifically addressing in that passage. That is, if there is to be any true understanding of author’s true distinction at all. In Shaul’s case, many Messianic Commentators have concluded that wherever the apostle employed the term “nomos”, he more than likely meant both the Oral and Written Torahs, with a handful of exceptions which are made evident by those passages’ overall context.

 

When I first learned that certain Messianic Commentators of scripture believed Shaul’s use of the term “nomos” in just about all cases referred to both the Oral and Written Torahs, I was a bit skeptical. However, after coming to understand just how intertwined the two sets of laws had become in early Rabbinic Judaism, and how influential the Oral Torah had become in virtually every religious and nominal Jew’s life, I have come full circle and agree, in principle, with those commentators’ sentiment.

 

Case in point: We have the story of the Gentile convert Cornelius in Acts 10. If you recall, Cornelius was a Roman Centurion who happened to be what Judaism would refer to as a “God-fearer”. Cornelius was led through a vision from heaven to send for the Apostle Shimon Keefa (aka Peter) who was at that time dwelling in Joppa. As Cornelius’ men approached the home where Keefa was staying, Keefa himself was experiencing an ecstatic vision. And we find out that the vision he had served to enlighten him to the profound fact that Yah is no respecter of person. That Abba is calling and loves both the Jew and the Greek. And thus, he—Keefa/Peter-could no longer hold the biases against Gentiles that most religious Jews of his time held towards Gentiles.

 

As Keefa was entering Cornelius’ home, he says to him:

 

You know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. Yet Yah has shown me that I should call no person defiled or ritually unclean (Acts 10:28; NET modified).

 

Was this which Shimon Keefa stated to Cornelius, from a “Law” perspective, accurate? Well, yes and no. You see, the Written Torah never made such a prohibition. Yah has never been “a respecter of persons” (reference: Romans 10:34; Deuteronomy/Devarim 10:17). However, according to the Oral Tradition, Keefa was absolutely correct. (Reference: Avodah Zara 29b, Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 113; 123:51; 128:1; Mishnah Avodah Zarah 1:1; and others.)

 

Now, although Jewish thinkers and teachers, not wanting to appear bigoted and haters in general to the outside world, have over the centuries gone to great lengths to stress that these and other rabbinic laws were rendered for purposes of “separating Jews from gentiles in order to prevent Jews from adopting idolatrous behavior”: These laws were instead used to foster and incite fear and bigotry among the Jewish citizenry, which in effect led to the erection of an oftentimes inseparable social and religious partition between Jew and non-Jew.

 

And so, we see here in this example that even one of the greatest apostles, well after his receiving of the Ruach HaKodesh (aka the Holy Spirit) on that Great Day of Shavu’ot (aka Pentecost), up to the Cornelius incident, still held tightly to many of the tenets of the Oral Law. And that vision that Keefa experienced was meant to purge out that error that is the Oral Tradition/Law/Torah.

 

Summary: “Nomos”, as used throughout Shaul’s writings, may be referring to the Written Torah; or the Oral Tradition/Law/Torah; or both. It just depends on the context in which it is used in the focus passage. When the context is not clear, as we find in many instances throughout the Book of Romans, it’s generally safe to conclude that the apostle is referring to both the Written and Oral Laws or Torahs.

 

Interpreting Paul’s Popular Phrase: “Works of the Law”

 

In addition to the Greek term “nomos”, Shaul uses the phrase “works of the Law” at leasts five-times in his writings (references: Romans 9:32; Galatians 2:16; 3:2, 5, 10).

 

The underlying concept that sort of partially defines this phrase is one that: If you steadfastly walked out Torah (let’s say the Written Torah) in accordance with whichever Jewish sect’s Oral Laws/Traditions in which you affiliated with (halachah), you would be deemed as righteous by that sect. And being deemed righteous by that sect because you walked in that sect’s ways, you would escape the curses of the covenant (contained in the Written Law) and also Yah’s righteous wrath.

 

Those of course who neglected or disregarded those sect-specific halachic principles in their walk would be subject to Yah’s wrath and the curses of the Covenant.

 

This was made all the more evident in the example of those who made up the Qumran Community, who despised the other Jewish sects (e.g., Pharisees and Sadducees) that worshiped and operated at the Temple in Yerushalayim. According to certain Dead Sea Scroll writings, only those who adhered to the halachah of their [Qumran] community were to be considered righteous before Elohim. They were referred to in some of the Dead Sea Scroll writings as “Sons of Righteousness” (DSS 4QMMT).

 

So, one’s righteousness was often seen as being dependent on the specific set of halachic laws, rules, and traditions that one kept or walked in.

 

Therefore, in great part, it was this “sect-specific righteousness” mindset that Shaul was having to contend with in his writings to both the Roman and Galatian Messianic Assemblies. And so, the phrase “works of the Law” had to do with these “sect-specific” halachic requirements that were being forced upon new non-Jewish converts in order for him/her to be admitted into the Assemblies of Messiah. Again, to the Orthodox Jew of Shaul’s day, these halachic practices served to make one righteous according to the leaders of those sects. This “sect-specific,” halachic-generated righteousness had nothing to do with being in a faithful, obedient, covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe. But rather, their brand of righteousness had everything to do with conforming to sectarian Jewish halachah.

 

For the Judaizer, or as Torah Scholar/Commentator Tim Hegg prefers to call them, “Influencers”, “works of the Law/Torah” featured, in many cases, physical circumcision for the men entering their assembly. To these, a Gentile male was required to become a proselyte in order for him to be (1) admitted to the ekklesia/kehila, and (2) to be reckoned as righteous. You see, to these so-called “influencers”, the Gospel message was about becoming Jewish and trusting in one’s “Jewishness”. And so, when you drill down to it, only a sectarian Jew could ever be viewed as righteous in this world, and escape Yah’s judgment and wrath.

 

This sentiment and understanding among the sectarians/Influencers/Judaizers seem to have been substantially based upon their manipulation of Deuteronomy/Devarim 27:26:

 

Cursed is the one who refuses to keep the words of this law (I.e., as they saw it, their oral law because they believed Moshe passed down the oral tradition to their religious leaders to administer) (NET).

 

Shaul, being the consummate Torah scholar and former Pharisee that he was, anticipated the Judaizers’ stance on this verse of Torah by phrasing the text accordingly:

 

Cursed is everyone who does not remain in everything that is written in the Book of the Law to do them (Romans 4:10).

 

Needless to say, the anti-Torah crowd simply loves this passage. Right? Because the way that Shaul words it, helps feed the notion, on their part, that any who would dare keep Torah are cursed. So, in the error-ridden mind of the anti-Torah activist, they rectify the question of Yah’s people walking in Torah by asking: “Why [would you] keep something [such as the “law”] where you’ll automatically be cursed? Thus, their remedy for this predicament is for one to outright abandon Torah-living, and embrace their “grace perverted” Gospel.

 

Summary: Paul’s use of the phrase “works of the law” is generally referring to an adherence to sect-specific halachic laws, traditions, and practices such as circumcision, for purposes of being saved, so to speak, and admitted into the Body of Messiah. It is never to be understood as derogatory of those who are in an faithful, obedient covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe and who are properly walking out Yah’s Torah.

 

The Role of Torah in the Lives of Yah’s Chosen People

 

It must be understood that Yah’s Torah was never meant as the means by which one enters into a covenant relationship with the Almighty. Nor does Yah’s Torah make one righteous by steadfast keeping of it. But rather, Torah serves in great part as the standard by which Yah’s chosen ones are to live and walk-out as they exist in that covenant relationship with Him.

 

Torah not only identifies or defines what sin is in the eyes of the Creator, but also the required penalties that are associated with violations/transgressions of Yah’s instructions in righteousness (I.e., Yah’s Torah).

 

And this is a point of much confusion for those who are within and outside our Faith Community. For as it served to do with our ancient Hebrew cousins, Yah’s Torah “magnifies” or “illuminates” our desperate need for a savior; our human tendency to not meet Yah’s established standards and marks of righteousness in the eyes of the Holy One of Yisra’el. Thus, Torah-defined-sin is all the more made evident to the transgressor of Yah’s instructions in righteousness. Consequently, it will not have the same illuminating or magnifying effect for one who does not respect Yehovah and His Ways. Why? Well, Abba stated it beautifully through the Prophet Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu:

 

(8) For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith YHVH. (9) For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts (55:8-9; KJV modified).

 

Shaul wrote to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers:

 

(14) But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit (Ruach) of Yah: For they are foolishness unto him. Neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. (15) But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. (16) For who hath known the mind of the Master, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Messiah (1 Corinthians 2:14-16; KJV modified).

 

In other words beloved: Humanity has her own concepts of what constitutes sin, while Yah has His own understanding of what sin is. Consequently, Yah’s concept and perspective of sin is the only one that matters. Man’s perspectives and concepts about sin mean absolutely nothing in the whole scheme of things.

 

What’s more, Yah’s perspectives of what constitutes sin also come with prescribed penalties for said sins.

 

That being said, when Yah’s Torah is not the law of the land, there can really be NO such transgression or violation of Torah. But rather, sin is defined by humanity’s own thoughts and concepts.

 

Certainly, to some lesser or greater extent, unrepentant humanity may define sin and treat sin according to their natural ability to discern between right and wrong.

 

Shaul wrote about this to his Roman Messianic readers:

 

(18) For the wrath of Elohim is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of people (I.e., sin) who suppress the truth by their unrighteousness, (19) because what can be known about Yah is plain to them, because Yah as made it plain to them. (20) For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, because they are understood through what has been made. So people are without excuse. (21) For although they knew Yah, they did not glorify Him as Elohim or give Him thanks, but they became futile in their thoughts and their senseless hearts were darkened (Romans 1; NET).

 

So then, rulings or verdicts that human courts render to address violations of sin as they see it, or violations of their established rules and laws and traditions, in many cases will not properly address the sin as Yah sees it.

 

Thus, as we saw evident with the ancients who left Egypt, their transgressions were made all the more evident after Yah codified and gifted His Torah to them. Case in point: Many of the Exodus Yisra’elites no doubt had been worshiping the “golden calf” their entire lives up to the point when Yah commanded that they have no other gods before Him (Exodus/Shemot 20:3-6, 23). Prior to the giving of this commandment, our ancient cousins’ worship of the gold calf was never an issue and the worship of it was viewed in many ways as a sanctioned way of life for them.

 

Despite Yah being known to those who were attached to the patriarchs, they persisted in their worshiping pagan gods:

 

(1) And Yah said unto Ya’achov, ‘Arise, go up to Bethel, and dwell there. And make there an altar unto Yehovah, that appeared unto thee when thou fleddest from the fact of Esav thy brother.’ (2) Then Ya’achov said unto his household, and to all that were with him, ‘Put away the strange gods that are among you, and be clean, and change your garments. (3) And let us arise, and go up to Bethel; and I will make there an altar unto Yah, who answered me in the day of my distress, and was with me in the way which I went. (4) And they gave unto Ya’achov all the strange gods which were in their hand, and all their earrings which were in their ears; and ya’acho hid them under the oak which was by Shechem (Genesis/Beresheit 35; KJV modified).

 

Did the ancients’ worship of their pagan gods constitute “sin?” In the eyes of Yah, indeed. And certainly, to these who worshiped their pagan gods, they had instilled in them naturally the understanding that Yehovah existed, and they inherently knew the difference between right and wrong. These will in the end be subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment based upon their natural understanding of the difference between right and wrong and their knowledge of Yah as Elohim. But they would not be subject to Yah’s Torah because it had not been codified and rendered to them at this point. And where Yah had not established commandments prohibiting the worship of these pagan gods, rhetorically, as Shaul is stating in our focus verse of Romans 4:15, there can be no transgression. For how can one violate an instruction that did not previously exist? 

 

But idolatry and pagan worship certainly was something that could be transgressed or violated once Yah gave the commandments prohibiting His chosen ones from engaging in it. So, from that point forward in the life of His chosen people, golden calf worship was to be viewed and treated as a violation of Yah’s way of life and subject to the penalties associated with it. Thus, worship of the golden calf by Yah’s people would naturally incite or invoke Yah’s righteous wrath and judgment upon violators or transgressors of Yah’s instructions prohibiting pagan worship.

 

But as clear as Yah’s instructions were prohibiting His people from engaging in pagan worship, there remained within many of them, the desire and stubborn willingness to disobey this commandment and engage in the prohibited worship. And of course, we know from scripture that the violators of that commandment faced Yah’s deadly wrath.

 

Today, those who profess to be people of the Bible have knowledge of Yah’s Torah, to a greater and lesser extent let’s just say. And thus, each and every one of those rational individuals are subject to Yah’s wrath which will be rendered through the judgment He will mete out through the framework of Torah. Those who for whatever reason do not possess knowledge of Torah, they will be subject to Yah’s wrath which will be rendered through the judgment He will mete out outside the framework of Torah.

 

Shaul addressed this in his letter to the Roman Messianic Assembly:

 

(12) All who have sinned outside the framework of Torah will die outside the framework of Torah; and all who have sinned within the framework of Torah will be judged by Torah. (13) For it is not merely the hearers of Torah whom Yah considers righteous; rather, it is the doers of what Torah says who will be made righteous in God’s sight. (14) For whenever Gentiles, who have no Torah, DO NATURALLY WHAT THE TORAH REQUIRES, then these, even though they don’t have Torah, for themselves are Torah (I.e., these operated in Yah’s moral laws. These simply did not possess the ritual and ceremony of Torah) (Romans 2; CJB).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more

Where there is no law, there is no transgression: Part-1-The Difference Between Sin and Transgression of the Law

A Continuation of Where we Left Off

 

Today, we sort of pick up where we left  off in our previous Paul and Hebrew Roots series. If you recall from our last installments to this series, the so-called Apostle to the Gentiles asserted to his Roman readers that he fully endorsed Torah-living/keeping for Yah’s set-apart people, as well as he fervently encouraged them to recognize that no amount of Torah-keeping is going to save them. That their salvation came by way of their trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

 

 

Our Focus Passage

 

 

Now, it should go without saying that we’ve all heard denominationalists harp about our keeping of Torah. They vehemently postulate that grace has replaced Torah-keeping. And for anyone who is in Christ to keep Torah, they tragically fall from grace.

 

And they use passages such our focus passage today to support their flawed premise:

 

Romans 4:11-15, paying particular attention to verse 15:

 

(11) And he (Avraham) received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised…

 

So, according to the Apostle Shaul (aka Paul), Avraham’s righteousness was reckoned unto Him by Yah before He was circumcised. And so, Avraham’s righteousness was attained by him as a result of his trusting faith in Yah.

 

Continuing:

 

…so that he could become the father of all those who believe but have never been circumcised, that they too could have righteousness credited to them.

 

So, through Avraham’s trust-based obedience of Yah, before he himself was ever circumcised, Yah promised an adoption into the covenant promises/the commonwealth of Yisrael, of those who were not of the circumcision—I.e., the Gentile. And like Avraham, they too would be reckoned righteous by a holy and just Elohim by their Faith. No circumcision. No Torah required in order to be reckoned righteous in the eyes of Elohim.

 

Continuing:

 

(12) And he (Avraham) is also the father of the circumcised, who are not only circumcised, but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised. (13) For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through Torah, but through the righteousness that comes by faith.

 

So then, Avraham’s exceptional faith and His chosen status, led to him being the spiritual father of all that trust in Yah and His Son Yahoshua for their eternal security. Avraham exemplified the ideal person of faith that Yah looks for in a would-be child of his. Avraham’s epic faith was the springboard that led to him being justified by the court of heaven.

 

Master taught that the “meek will inherit the earth.”

 

And it was our Master Yahoshua, who came through Avraham’s biological line, who is the de-facto heir to the world. Although the promise Avraham received was for the land of Canaan and to be the father of many nations (Gen. 12:3), it is Yahoshua who will inherit the world. And we who are of Him are through our covenant relationship with Yah, co-heirs of the world. All this is traced back to the Avrahamic Covenant:

 

“…and in thee shall all the tribes of the earth be blessed” (Gen. 12:3; LXX).

 

Continuing:

 

(14) For if they (both Jew and Gentile alike) become heirs by Torah, faith is empty and the promise is nullified. (15) For Torah brings wrath, because where there is no law there is no transgression either (Romans 4:12-15; NET modified).

 

With Shaul making this shock-wave of an announcement just a few verses earlier that he established/upheld/confirmed/supported Torah-living in the life of Yah’s set-apart ones, how can he make such an abrupt turn-around with a statement like this? Was Shaul really suggesting here that with the Law/Torah having been done away with, the person who comes under grace is no longer in danger of violating or transgressing it? Therefore he or she is free and clear from the penalties and wrath associated with having to keep the Law/Torah perfectly?

 

Or, is the great Apostle to the Gentles saying something else entirely?

 

It is by way of Pauline passages such as our focus passage today that traditionalists/denominationalists contend that people are incapable of keeping Torah. And thus, according to their anti-Torah patron the Apostle Paul, those who choose to live a life of Torah are inevitably subject to the Creator’s wrath.

 

But riddle me this then Batman: If Yah’s people are incapable of keeping His Torah, why then would Yah give Torah to them in the first place? Was Yah simply setting His people up for a great fall? Was He giving His people an impossible task, only to get a point across and in the process humiliate them? To trip up the very people that He said He loved (Hos. 3:1)?

 

Beloved, is this the type of Elohim that we serve? One who plays games with His human creation? One who abuses and uses the very ones that He claims to love? I don’t think so.

 

Of Yisra’el, Abba said:

 

“For I know what I have planned for you,” say YHVH. “I have plans to prosper you, not to harm you. I have plans to give you a future filled with hope” (Jer. 29:11; KJV modified).

 

Now, does this seem like a God who seeks to set His loved ones up for failure? No. It does NOT!

 

The anti-Torah crowd loves this particular passage. For it goes a long way to play on their desperate search for reasons not to obey Yah’s Torah. For if one can simply take this passage and interpret it from the standpoint that it is impossible for anyone to keep Torah, and that one’s righteousness and eternal security is entirely dependent on Yah’s grace, then there stands absolutely no reasons for one to obey the Creator, the example of Avraham tragically not withstanding.

 

The Impossibility of Keeping Torah (According to Some)

 

Is it possible to keep Yah’s Torah, and to walk in it blamelessly? Of course it is.

 

Allow me to ask you this:

 

Can you or I resist murdering; stealing; fornicating; adulterating? Is it possible for us to love Abba Father and love our neighbor as ourselves? Is it possible for us to keep His weekly Sabbath? To abstain from consuming forbidden foods? Is it possible for us to keep/observe Yah’s set-apart days? Granted, these examples are not the entirety of Torah commandments, but just a sampling. But I think we can all agree that we can keep the applicable Torah instructions blamelessly.

 

But then the anti-Torah crowd is likely to come back at us with: “Oh, but James and Paul say that if you break a single Torah commandment, you’re guilty of breaking the entirety of Torah. Right?

 

Well, in a sense they’re right.But not entirely, however. For the observation that was made by Yahoshua’s brother Ya’achov, James the Just, is properly understood from the perspective of when one “intentionally” breaks one of Yah’s commandments at the expense of keeping all of Yah’s commandments,” then yes, he/she is guilty of breaking the whole of Torah (Jas. 2:10). James made this key statement in context of warning his readers against the temptation and lure of being partial towards another (vss. 1-9). So then, when one’s heart is not right and he or she intentionally seeks to break Torah in order to appeal to his/her own sensitivities and preferences, then indeed, they have transgressed the whole of Torah.

 

For the keeping of Torah is a way of life. And when one absolves themselves of keeping only those elements of Yah’s way of life that best appeals to them, then indeed, they have denied and rejected Yah’s entire Torah and Way of Life.

 

We are indeed flawed creatures. And so, we are prone to sin. Sin is the transgression of Torah (1 Joh. 3:4). Now, any transgression of Torah on our part should never occur. But if a transgression were to occur, it should only come about through ignorance and by mistake. And knowing how flawed we are, Yah made provision in His Torah for such sins, which are often referred to as “sins of omission”.

 

But intentional transgressions of Torah, aka “sins of commssion”, are a completely different ball of wax. These require Yah’s complete restructuring of the offender’s heart, mind, and soul, in order for that offender to walk uprightly before Him. Such sins of omission are born of a rebellious heart. And although repentance and forgiveness are required to get pass such transgressions in the mind and heart of our loving Father, the offender must have work done inside of them—that is a circumcision of the heart—in order for them to leave at and burn-up such sin and evil at Yah brazen altar. In other words, it’s not enough to repent and seek forgiveness of wanton, sins of commission. One must endeavor to not repeat those sins ever again.

 

This is where the real issue of keeping the whole of Torah comes in: This habitual, even intentional transgression of Torah that we don’t want to think or even talk about. It makes us uncomfortable to admit that we’ve intentionally broken or violated Yah’s Torah.

 

So, many folks who, for whatever reason, refuse to come to terms with their rebelliousness choose to side with the majority that holds that it is impossible to keep Yah’s Torah and that violations and transgressions of Torah really don’t matter, because we are inherently incapable of keeping Torah. And thus, we are saved from having to keep Torah by God’s outrageous grace.

 

An Irreconcilable Disparity

 

 

I find the disparity that exists between Yah’s law and the laws of this nation very interesting. By rabbinic count, there are only 611 commandments that make-up the Creator’s Torah. But according to a 2015 article entitled: “How Many Federal Laws are There Again?”, there are some 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000 to 300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally in this country. And this is just federal laws. There are essentially 100’s of 1,000s of state and municipal laws that the citizens of this country are required to abide by if they want to maintain the freedoms afforded to them by the constitution of this nation. Yet you’ll never hear a single person say that it is impossible to keep the laws of this country or this land. How does such a situation exist? That denominationalists and such declare without equivocation that NO one is capable of keeping Torah, yet they themselves have no problem keeping the laws of this nation. Doesn’t make sense, does it? And the bigger irony of this dichotomy is that a great many of these municipal, state, and federal laws are in whole or in part based loosely on Torah principles and commandments. (Not all of federal, state, and municipal laws of course, but some.)

 

Yochanan gave us a remedy for willful and intentional transgressions of Yah’s Torah:

 

(9) If we confess our sins, He (Yah) is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. (10) If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us (1 John 1:9-10).

 

David wrote of this very thing:

 

Then I confessed my sin (sin being the transgression of Torah); I no longer covered up my wrongdoing. I said, “I will confess my rebellious acts to YHVH.” And then You forgave my sins. (Selah) (Psa. 32:5).

 

Beloved, David’s solemn admission was written before Yahoshua’s earthly ministry. Seeking forgiveness for transgressions of Torah (apart from the required animal sacrifices) was indeed a known element of one’s obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah back in the day.

 

Then there’s Solomon who wrote of this:

 

The one who covers his transgressions will not prosper, but whoever confesses them and forsakes them will find mercy (Pro. 28:13).

 

Beloved, there is forgiveness for our transgressions of Torah. That is, if we confess, ask Yah to forgive us, and then forsake our sinful ways. Back in David’s and Solomon’s day, they had to comply with the proper animal sacrifices to temporarily atone for their transgressions. But in addition to those required sacrifices and offerings, the offender was still compelled to repent of their transgression, seek Yah’s forgiveness, and endeavor never to repeat that transgression again.

 

 

But then, Yehovah provided us the perfect sacrifice that would permanently atone for our transgressions. But Yahoshua’s perfect sacrifice is only as effectively as the extent of one’s heart is truly circumcised. When we transgress Yah’s Torah, are we truly convicted and repentant of our transgressions? Will we work to overcome and not repeat those transgressions in the future? Or are we simply looking for a moment’s forgiveness so that we may continue about our sinful ways. I’ve been there. I know that I’ve asked Yah’s forgiveness, knowing full well that I would likely repeat those transgressions in the future. And that attitude is a serious problem beloved. For Yah’s grace does not cover such continued, rebellious, willful lawlessness. And that’s where a complete change of heart and surrender of our lives to Yahoshua comes into play. Otherwise, we engage in an endless, circular game with Father Yah: Sin. Seek Yah’s forgiveness. Repeat the same sin. Seek Yah’s forgiveness for that same sin again. And so on. And Father Yah is not into playing games I’m afraid.

 

Praise Yah that I’ve overcome, for the most part, most if not all vestiges of rebellion that I had toward Him and His Ways and His Torah. But my overcoming of my rebellious ways came only after I finally died to self and asked Yah to scrape and remove that rebelliousness out of me. That desire and propensity to intentionally transgress Yah’s Torah.

 

I gave a teaching to a Sabbath-keeping group in Baltimore Maryland back in 2019 that I entitled, “Stuck in the Outer Court.” And in that teaching, I discussed the process by which one would bring their atoning sacrifices to the Tabernacle or Tent of Meeting, to address a transgression of Torah. The goal of that process was to be in right standing with the Almighty who whose presence was in the Holy Place. The atoning sacrifices took place in the outer court.

 

And I brought to the listeners’ attention that that process would be often be repeated in an endless cycle of transgressing Yah’s Torah, seeking atonement and or repentance, only to be repeated by the offender. And in so doing, the offender found him/herself stuck in the outer court of the Tabernacle.

 

Thus, I asked the group whether or not we are stuck in the outer court, never ever making it to Yah’s true presence because we refuse to break the cycle of transgressing, atonement/repenting, transgressing, atonement/repenting.

 

In that sense beloved, that unbreakable cycle, indeed for some, is proof that it is impossible to keep Torah blamelessly.

 

 

Here’s the Problem Related to Keeping Torah Perfectly

 

So then, it seems to me that the real issue as it relates to being able to walk in Torah blamelessly or perfectly has nothing really to do with one being physically, emotionally, and spiritually capable of doing so, as we’ve shown to be the case otherwise.

 

The problem with people accepting the lie that it is impossible to walk out Torah blamelessly has to do with an accurate—a true—understanding of (1) the role and purpose of Torah in the life of Yah’s people. (2) A true understanding of the biblical concepts of sin and transgression. And (3) where Torah fits in as it relates to the entire world.

 

For the remainder of this discussion, we will seek to gain an understanding of the biblical—the Hebraic—concepts of sin and transgression/violations of Torah. For indeed, there is a notable difference between the two, although the two concepts do indeed intersect and often become indistinguishable.

 

Then in Parts 2 and 3 we will further define the role and purpose of Torah in the life of Yah’s people, as well as seek to understand where Torah fits in as it relates to the entire world.

 

And so, armed with the knowledge of these concepts and elements, we will be very well situated to understand what the Apostle Shaul (Paul) meant when he wrote: “Where there is no Law, there is no transgression” (Romans 4:15).

 

 

Distinguishing Sin from Transgression of Torah—There is a Difference

 

For us who are of the Hebraic—Messianic Faith Community—it has been drilled into our heads that sin is lawlessness or is the transgression of the law (1 Joh. 3:4; KJV).

 

So, we’ve been conditioned to conflate the two concepts of “sin” and “transgression of the law.” Which in and of itself makes perfect sense. But it only makes sense if we place very human on the planet, be they Yah’s people or people of the world, under Torah for purposes of judgment and lifestyle expectation.

 

But is every soul on the planet under Torah? Is every soul going to be judged through Torah by Yah? And the answer to these questions is a resounding no. We covered this extensively in our series entitled “What Did Paul Mean by Being Under the Law?

 

In that discussion we concluded that those who possess knowledge of Torah will be judged of Yah within the framework of Torah, while those who have no knowledge of Torah will be judged outside the framework of Torah.

 

And this concept is the very basis of our coming to a proper understanding of our Romans 4:15 focus passage: “Where there is no law there is no transgression.”

 

What Exactly is Sin Then?

 

Our English term “sin” in Hebrew is “chatta’th”. It is essentially acts that are rebellious against Yah and His Will and Plan. It is a deviation from that which the Creator mapped or marked out for His human creation to abide by. Sin then is a moral failure toward both Yah and men.

 

From a Hebraic standpoint, the ideological concept of sin hearkens back to the act of one “shooting an arrow or other object to a target” (Reference Jeff A. Benner; Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible; pg. 121). So then, the distance that the shooter’s arrow, let’s say, misses the target is measured by a cord, which serves to inform the shooter of just how far they were from their intended target or mark.

 

This physical, natural activity of determining how far one’s arrow strayed from its intended mark is intended to help us understand that Yah measures one’s wrong actions against the correct and proper actions that He from the beginning of time established for His human creation.

 

So, when one sins, he or she has engaged in an activity or action that is beyond or outside of the proper, correct behavior that Yah expects from any rational human being. Thus, the one who sins misses Yah’s established mark.

 

Bear in mind, we’re not necessarily talking about the established, sanctioned behavior that Torah marks out for those who are Yah’s. But rather, we’re talking about doing something—engaging in behavior that we inherently—intrinsically know is wrong (Romans 1).

 

That being said, we know that all humans sin and fall short of Yah’s naturally established standards (Rom. 3:23). And because each of us has sinned, we find ourselves subject to Yah’s judgment and wrath (Rom. 1:18). And as a result of Yah’s grace, the vast majority of us have not experienced Yah’s judging wrath as yet. That judging wrath sadly looms ahead of every human being. Thus, there is a debt hanging over every individual’s soul. And that debt must be paid in full to satisfy the offense that is every human’s rebellion.

 

But Praise Yah from Whom all blessings flow. Yeshua made one qualified, atoning sacrifice for the sins of this world (Joh. 1:29). And the sacrifice that He (our Master Yahoshua) made on behalf of all humanity satisfies the sin debt that is owed by every human being who will place their trust/faith in Him and enter into an obedient, covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe.

 

Transgressions

 

Now, when it comes to the concept of “transgression”, specifically of Yah’s Torah, we find that Father sees it as sinful. However, the term is used generally to describe the commission of an established, codified offense such as Torah. Someone crosses an established line. And that established line, in our context, is Torah. One commits a transgression when they break a Torah instruction or commandment: whether by omission or commission. So, when we consider the question of transgression of the Law, we must have at the forefront of our conversation and thoughts an understanding that the transgressor is subject to Torah. If the individual in question is not subject to Torah (I.e., they do not possess knowledge of Torah), they cannot possibly transgress or violate the commandment or law in question. Yes, in principle they can violate Torah commandments. But in reality, they are not subject to the penalties associated with violation of Torah commandments. Which essentially means that only those who have knowledge of Torah can transgress or violate Torah. The rest of the world, instead, misses Yah’s prescribed mark for all humans. And Shaul goes into stark detail to outline specifically what we’re talking about here in Romans 1:18-32. (We discussed this in an earlier post.) These essentially rebel against Yah’s natural laws, of which they will be held accountable.

 

And this is essentially what Shaul is saying to His Roman Messianic readers. Torah is not a universal entity as far as it concerns the world. Torah invokes guilt on those who possess Torah, not those who are outside of Torah. Those who possess knowledge of and who transgress Torah will be held responsible for their violations or transgression of Torah (I.e., they will be judged within the framework of Torah), while those who do NOT possess Torah and who sin—who do not meet Yah’s natural moral standards and who rebel against His righteous and holy Plan and Will, they shall be subject to His wrath (I.e., they will be judged outside the framework of Torah).

 

This is the point that Shaul is trying to convey to His Roman Messianic readers here. He also touches upon this principle in other areas of his letter to the Romans:

 

“For all who have sinned apart (or outside the framework of Torah) will also perish outside the framework of Torah, and all who have sinned within the framework of Torah will be judged by Torah” (2:12; CJB).

 

 

(12) So then, just as sin entered the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all people because all sinned—(13) for before the law was given, sin was in the world, but there is no accounting for sin when there is no law (5:12-13; NET).

 

Beloved, we will continue this critical conversation/discussion in Part 2 of this series within a series: Where There is no Law There is no Transgression.

 

 

 

Biblical Illiteracy Behind the Anti-Hebrew Roots Agenda

Is Biblical Illiteracy behind the Anti-Hebrew Roots Agenda these days. In this post I reflect upon a recent experience I had on Facebook that suggested to me that Biblical Illiteracy may, in part, be behind the animus Christians have towards our Hebrew Roots/Messianic...

read more

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

read more

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

read more

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

read more

The Exceeding Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness That Takes us from Passover to Tabernacles-Part 2–Maintaining our Righteous Garments

Goal

I will be picking up from where I left-off from Part-1 of our last discussion entitled “The Exceeding Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness That Takes us from Passover/Pesach to Tabernacles/Sukkot.” Or rather, from Babylon/the world to the Kingdom.

 

And if by chance you didn’t catch last week’s discussion, I would humbly encourage you to check it out. That discussion forms the basis for our discussion here today.

 

In that discussion we identified a critical kingdom-qualifying concern that affects every would-be disciple of Yahoshua Messiah. And that critical kingdom-qualifying concern is found in Matthew 5:17-20, which reads:

 

(17) “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. (18) For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. (19) Therefore, whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. (Why don’t denominationalists pay attention to this key passage?) Continuing: (20) For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and pharisees, you will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven (ESV).

 

 We see laid out here before us in this passage, clear as day, the astounding declaration that for any disciple of Yeshua Messiah to make it into the Kingdom of Yah, his or her righteousness must exceed/surpass that of the Scribes and Pharisees.

 

The other thing to mention here is that as a framework for our last discussion, I likened Passover/Pesach to the starting point of the spiritual journey that we as Yah’s elect must embark on, with a goal of making it to Sukkot (or the Feast of Tabernacles), which is emblematic of the Kingdom of Yah. And that we enter Pesach/Unleavened Bread with our eyes, hearts, minds, and souls fixed on and excitedly anticipating the coming Feast of Tabernacles/Sukkot or the Kingdom of Yah.

 

So, we talked about the dire need for us to possess a righteousness that transcends the righteousness of the religious elite (e.g., the Scribes and Pharisees) if we are to make it into the Kingdom.

 

Today, beloved, I want to quickly touch upon what that exceeding/surpassing righteousness looks like in our Creator’s eyes. Practically speaking, how we get our grubby little fingers on that exceeding kingdom qualifying righteousness that takes us from Pesach to Sukkot?

 

Attention

Whatever system we put our trust/faith in to take us from Passover to Tabernacles, be it a religious one, a secular one, or even an idealistic one, requires that we follow a set of standards and conform to the way of life that the leaders of those systems have put into place. For the denominationalists, it’s all about reciting the sinner’s prayer and waiting for the rapture of the church. For the Catholic, it’s all about conforming to the Catholic way of life: Being a good Catholic. For the Jew, it’s all about one’s Jewishness and adhering to the teachings and way of life put forth by the rabbinic sages. And for the idealist, it’s whatever foolishness one conjures up in his or her mind that gets them to the Kingdom, such as simply being a “good person”; whatever that truly means.

 

The Jewish religious system had an established set of standards that the everyday Betty and John Smiths of the world had to adhere to if they had any inkling of making it into the Kingdom. Those standards, if followed precisely, made one righteous in the eyes of the religious leaders of Yeshua’s day.

Righteousness, as we briefly discussed in our last post, is essential for one to make it into the Kingdom. BUT, that Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness does not come to us as a result of our following the rules, traditions, and laws/doctrines of any religion; or that of any religious organization, including the Church Triumphant; nor is it of one’s own set of righteous principles and standards. But rather, that exceeding kingdom qualifying righteousness that takes us from Passover to Tabernacles comes exclusively to the disciple of Yahoshua Messiah in response to his or her obedience to the Torah of the Creator of the Universe and the teachings and example of the Father’s Right-Arm, Yeshua Messiah.

The problem, however, is that those righteous standards that we are required to walk-out/live-out/operate-in if we are to make it into the Kingdom, when properly followed by the would-be child of the Most High, those righteous standards are harder to meet than even the established standards of the Scribes and Pharisees.

Those exceeding standards, which translates into the Father’s exclusive prescribed way of life for those who He has chosen, was described by our Master as likened unto “a narrow gate and a very difficult pathway that only a remnant–a precious few–ever find (Matthew 7:13-14).

 

Need

So, our mission—if we choose to take it—is to somehow find and walk out that rocky, difficult path and enter that narrow gate that becomes our exceeding kingdom qualifying righteousness.

But, to locate and walk-out that rough-rocky road and enter that narrow gate, we must first have the desire to do so. We must desperately want the Kingdom and be willing to do what it takes to get there. Right? How often have we taken on things-adventures-endeavors in our lives that we truly didn’t want to take on in the first place? And we eventually find ourselves, because our hearts weren’t in that adventure in the first place, slacking; dragging our feet; neglecting to do that which we originally agreed to do. So, we ultimately end up dropping out of that adventure altogether. We effectively failed to count the costs associated with that endeavor.

So, this journey that leads to Sukkot/Tabernacles then must begin, in essence, with the desire to make it to Tabernacles. And the exorbitant costs that are associated with that journey must be factored into one’s desire and intention to walk out that journey towards the Kingdom. Many have taken on this difficult journey over the years, only to have dropped out during the journey because they did not count the immense costs that are associated with Messianic discipleship. As I’ve said many times on this platform beloved, like everything in life, there are no true “free lunches.”

Beloved, this journey that we have been called to, is not about blindly keeping Father’s Feasts, the food laws, and not working on the Sabbath. Those are the basic, elementary elements of righteousness that we are compelled to possess and walk-in. And quite frankly, those are the easier aspects of the journey towards Sukkot/Tabernacles.

But rather, Abba demands more from us. He in fact, demands everything from us. He demands that we turn our entire lives over to Him and walk uprightly before Him in all our ways. That we obey His Torah in Spirit and in Truth with love, justice, and mercy as our spiritual guides. That we imitate our Master Yeshua in every conceivable way. That we lean not to our own understanding in the ways we conduct ourselves along this difficult journey. But rather, that we trust Abba Father to guide our walk, talk, and thoughts throughout our days, such that we glorify and image Him in the earth. Such that we exist in an exclusive covenant relationship with Him, and no other elohim.

So, one of the first things that we must do to achieve that exceeding Kingdom-Qualifying righteousness is to desperately want it and to count the cost of true Messianic discipleship.

 

Satisfaction

Case in point.

What many of us know today in scripture as the so-called “Sermon on the Mount”, from which I drew Yeshua’s pronouncement that one’s righteousness must exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees if he/she wants to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, constitutes the essential “Keys to the Kingdom.” If we want to understand what Kingdom-Qualifying Righteousness looks like, that’s where we go. The Sermon on the Mount. Three chapters of instructions in righteousness (chapters 5-7) that Yahoshua devoted to unlocking the mysteries of how His would-be disciples qualify for the Kingdom.

 

Visualization

Denominationalism has taught us that the Great Sermon on the Mount was attended by hundreds, if not thousands of people who wanted to receive those keys to the Kingdom. But what if I were to tell you that that’s not exactly accurate.

The truth of the matter is that the Sermon on the Mount was attended by just a handful of Yeshua’s disciples.

We find in Matthew 5:1 the following:

 

“And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him:”

 

You see, only those who Yeshua chose and who hungered and thirsted after righteousness chose to ascend the mountain to sit at Master’s feet received those essential Keys to the Kingdom.

 

What about the multitude you ask? Those seeking healing, signs, and even a meal. In other words, those who were focused on their personal lives for that day without any anticipatory eye towards Tabernacles (aka the Kingdom). Well Luke records that Yeshua came down from the Mount after teaching His disciples these Keys to the Kingdom, and He healed those of the crowd that were sick and THEN He gives to those souls what some have described as “The Sermon on the Plain” (Luke 6:17-49). Comparatively, that Sermon was just a snippet of the “Sermon on the Mount” that His called-out ones received.

 

So, one of the first steps towards receiving that Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness is to want it.

 

The second step is to die to self and exclusively walk in our Father’s ways.

 

Of this, our Master stated:

 

Matthew 7:21: Not everyone that saith unto Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, but he that doeth the will of My Father which is in heaven.

 

What is the Will of the Father? Quite simply this:

 

Fear God and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. (Ecc 12:13 KJV)

 

Denominationalists contend that we don’t have to keep or live or walk out Torah–Father’s instructions in righteousness–because the whole of Torah–of the Law, according to these, was done away with the sacrifice of our Master Yeshua. To these, the Law/the Torah was nailed to the cross along with Jesus (Col. 2:14).

 

These unfortunately, completely miss the connection that exists between Exceeding Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness and obedience to the Creator’s way of life. For in that same conversation–the Sermon on the Mount–Yeshua told His disciples:

 

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Mat 5:17-19 KJV)

 

In other words, beloved, Yeshua is saying to us here in this passage that as His disciples, we don’t get a free pass into the Kingdom. We must meticulously walk in His Father’s ways. Not the ways of religion. Not the ways that best suit us. But rather in Yah’s set-apart ways. And woe unto any who have the audacity to refuse to walk in His Father’s ways and who encourage others not to obey the Creator’s instructions in righteousness. These will be essentially “persona non-grata” in the Kingdom–unaccepted and unwelcomed in the Kingdom.

Action

Switching gears, somewhat:

For a Levitical Priest to enter the dwelling place of Yah-the Holy Place of the Tabernacle or Temple–he had to be ritually pure. He had to be blameless. Otherwise, he would not be permitted to enter the Holy Place. And if he were to violate the ritual purity requirements for operating in the Holy Place, he stood the inevitable chance of being struck down by Yah’s presence.

If we liken the Kingdom of Yah to the Holy Place of the Tabernacle and Temple from back in the day, to that of the coming Kingdom of Yah–the place where Yah will dwell with His Chosen ones, we must be in a state of righteousness that is beyond reproach. We must be clean if we expect to make it into the Kingdom—make it to Sukkot.

When we come into Faith, having repented, and having committed our whole lives to an obedient covenant relationship with the Eternal, we are gifted a brand new, pressed, spotless set of righteous garments. Those garments are gifted to us–they are imputed to us. And without those righteous garments, we cannot enter the Kingdom of Yah.

However, the denominationalists contend that once you receive those gifted garments of righteousness, you don’t have to do anything more with or to them. You’re good to go. You don’t even have to wash and maintain them.

And so, a good many of those folks are going to show up at the gates of the Kingdom on that day, wearing those neglected, tired, dirty, unkempt, once righteous garments, and they’re going to be turned away by our Master, who will tell them that He never knew them; that they are to depart from His presence because they were workers of “lawlessness” (Matthew 7:22-23). These did not maintain their garments of righteousness by obeying Yah’s instructions in righteousness.

And so, the last thing that we must do to achieve that Kingdom Qualifying Righteousness is to maintain those pristine garments of righteousness that Yah has gifted us–that Yah has imputed unto us through the Person and Ministries of Yeshua our Messiah.

 

We find in Revelation 3:14-22 our Master Yeshua’s critical assessment of the Church of Laodecia. And Yeshua assessed that the Church of Laodecia was severely lacking spiritually.

 

  • These had become marginal–tepid–milk-toast believers who Yeshua described as being neither hot nor cold.
  • These had deluded themselves into thinking they’d arrived. So, they did nothing to maintain their imputed–their gifted righteous garments.

 

Yeshua was so frustrated with Laodecia that He threated to “spit them out of His mouth” if they didn’t get their spiritual acts together.

 

So, He encourages them to be zealous in their walk in Messiah. Remain in covenant relationship with the Father by obediently walking steadfastly in His ways. And if they messed up along the way, they were to repent, return (Teshuvah) and stay ever so close to Him.

So beloved, how do we maintain our righteous garments and not be spit out by Yeshua on that day?

 

  • Don’t be a slacker. Don’t try to shirk Yah’s instructions in righteousness. Don’t try to circumvent His Ways in a futile effort to appeal to our own flawed sense of righteousness personal preferences. The angel told John the Revelator that the endurance of the saints of Elohim are those that keep the Creator’s commandments and maintain a trusting faith in Yeshua Messiah (Revelation 14:12).
  • Pay attention to the details of Father’s instructions. Don’t overlook things. Don’t water His instructions down.

 

Beloved, we may sometimes get the overwhelming feeling that everything we’ve discussed here in this teaching today is ridiculously hard and virtually impossible to do and maintain. That getting from Pesach to Sukkot is an impossible task. That making it into the Kingdom can’t be done and that it’s just too hard to do, especially living in this world.

 

But let us keep this beautiful exchange that Yeshua had with His disciples in mind whenever we feel overwhelmed in our journey towards Tabernacles:

 

 25 When his disciples heard it (i.e., Yeshua’s rejection of the Rich Young Ruler to become one of His disciples), they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? 26 But Yeshua  beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with Yah all things are possible. 27 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? (In other words, “Look Master, we’ve given up everything in our personal lives to follow you. What’s in it for us to even attempt to make it into the Kingdom, which you’ve described as being essentially out of reach for even rich folks?) 28 And Yeshua said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration (i.e., the Messianic Age) when the Son of Man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And everyone that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. (This being the costs associated with true Messianic discipleship that I mentioned previously.) (Mat 19:25-29 KJV; modified)

 

Beloved, Tabernacles/Sukkot is within our reach. Let us then press onward to the Kingdom. Let us always hunger and thirst after that exceeding righteousness that qualifies us for the Kingdom. And let us never forget that Father’s Spirit (i.e., Abba’s Ruach HaKodesh) is fully accessible to each of us. He will help us along our arduous journey from Pesach to Sukkot. From the Babylon/the world to the Kingdom.

 

 

Overturning Roe v. Wade and the Modern Messianic-Thoughts and Reflections

A Leak That is Shaking up Nation

On M-nday, 5/2/2022, The Epoch Times reported that a supposedly leaked U.S. Supreme Court document suggests that the Judicial Branch of this country may finally overturn controversial Roe V. Wade. News of this leak rocked the legislative Branch of the U.S. government, with the conservative side of the aisle praising SCOTUS for doing the right thing, while the liberal/progressive side of the aisle entered into a season of handwringing and gnashing of teeth at the forthcoming potential ruling.

Defining Roe v. Wade

In case you weren’t aware, Roe v. Wade, according to Wikipedia, was a landmark 1973 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which “the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.”

The effect this judicial decision had on this nation cannot be understated. Although numbers vary, depending on the source, it is generally accepted that since the passage of Roe v. Wade, some 60 million children have been murdered through the vehicle of legalized abortions (An estimated 62 million abortions have occurred since Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 | Fox News). Consequently, abortions since the passage of this court decision have become a part of Americana. For it has become widely accepted and touted by those in support of abortion rights, that any and all women have a right to choose what happens to their bodies. The adage: my body, my choice has essentially undermined any and all talk about the efficacy and moral rectitude related to the issue of abortion in this nation. A nation, mind you, that many have proclaimed over the years, was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles.

The Pervasiveness of the Pro-Abortion Mindset and Acceptance

Which of course leads to the fundamental point that most every sect of denominationalism and of catholicism tend towards being anti-abortion. In fact, since Roe v. Wade became the law of the land in relation to so-called abortion rights, conservative-leaning Christians and Orthodox Catholics have stood firm against the killing of any children: Both the born and the unborn. This anti-abortion position has probably been the one issue that has united denominationalists the most in this country.

And rightfully so. For although Scripture itself does not outright prohibit the act of abortion (since abortions were not practiced among Yah’s people), it does provide the truth-seeker the Creator’s view of the sanctity of the unborn life:

Exodus/Shemot 20:13—”Thou shalt not kill” (KJV).

Job 31:15—”Did not He that made me in the womb make him? And did not one fashion us in the womb” (KJV)?

Psalm 22:10—”I was cast upon thee from the womb: Thou art my God from my mother’s belly” (KJV).

Psalm 127:3-5—”Lo, children are an heritage of Yehovah: And the fruit of the womb is His reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them. They shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate” (KJV, modified).

Psalm 139:13-16—”For thou hast possessed my reigns: Thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: Marvelous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well. My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them” (KJV).

Jeremiah/Yermiyah 1:5—”Before I (Yah speaking) formed thee in the belloy I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations” (KJV).

How many of the 60-plus souls murdered as a result of Roe v. Wade would have been Jeremiahs to this lost generation?

Indeed, there is a price that must be paid for the 60 or so innocent lives that were snuffed out in this nation, not solely because of Roe v. Wade, but more so, by the evil hearts of those who cared only for themselves and who despised Yehovah and His Ways. These, scripture foretells, are subject to Yah’s holy and righteous wrath:

“For the wrath of Elohim is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; because that which may be known of Elohim is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them” (Rom. 1:18-19; KJV).

Any rational person knows that killing an innocent, unborn child is wrong and that that wrong must in the end be answered for.

Yah Has a Special Place in His Heart for the Unborn

It should be evident that Yah has a very special place in His heart from the unborn and for children in general. And the fact that the general consensus of this nation’s citizens are in favor of abortion only tells us just how far a people’s hearts are from Yehovah. How depraved humanity has become? For there was a time in this country when even the thought of aborting a baby was viewed as unconscionable and evil by even the most secular of society.

So, this whole thinking on the part of this nation’s conservatives and evangelicals and Catholics in this country, being in jubilant celebration over what could be the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the U.S. Supreme Court is simply spiritual window covering. In order for any abolition of Roe v. Wade to have any true teeth to it; to make any true leeway on the path towards an overall Biblical view on the sanctity of life, must begin and end with the heart of the people. For truth be told, the heart cannot be legislated.

The Disparity in Views About Abortion Among the Religious in Society

In general, Denominationalism and Catholicism stand firmly against Abortion in this country, with few exceptions. However, according to an article in myjewishlearning.com entitled “Abortion and Judaism”, a majority of religious Jews actually support abortion. These believe that abortions “should be legal in all/most cases.” The article, in fact, draws from a 2015 Pew Research Forum survey that asserted that “83% of American Jews, more than any other religious group, say abortion should be legal in all/most cases.”

It appears that rabbinic Jewish law does not grant the unborn person status until he or she is born. Talmudic sources such as Yevamot 69b view the unborn child of less than 40-days gestation as “mere water.”

Despite general modern-day, Jewish sensibilities that favor abortion, and rabbinite Talmudic opinions that have the effect of de-humanizing the unborn, “feticide” (aka abortion) is effectively prohibited by so-called Jewish law. Now, I know this sounds contradictory, given what we’ve just discussed in terms of modern-day Jewish-pro-abortion sensibilities. But it remains clear even to the pro-abortion leaning Jewish religious leaders that abortion runs contrary to what is called Jewish law. For abortion would in effect be the “shedding of [man’s] blood,” which Yah expressly prohibited (Genesis/Beresheit 9:6). Actually, some rabbinic sources translate this passage to read more specifically: “the blood of man within man”, suggesting that the Creator was prohibiting abortion more than general shedding of blood through violent means.

So to be honest, there is some disagreement as to the efficacy of abortion among general, modern-day Jews, with the majority leaning in favor of abortion for any woman who chooses to undergo one. However, there is this general understanding in rabbinic literature that abortion is not permissible, except in the case when the mother’s life is endangered by the pregnancy. In such cases, these Jewish sources (e.g., the Mishnah) go so far as to suggest that an abortion is absolutely mandatory.

But then, these same sources also suggest that once the child has begun to emerge from his/her mother, abortion for any reason is then strictly prohibited.

I would be remiss in not mentioning that abortions are absolutely legal in the State of Israel. According to the “myjewishlearning” article, “there are no laws limiting when an abortion can be performed…”

The heart of man is desperately wicked (Jeremiah 17:9).

If the people’s hearts are not changed, will an overturning of Roe v. Wade make any difference in this country as it relates to the killing of babies and Molech worship, which abortion essentially is (Lev. 18:21; 20:2-5)?

It might be reasonably argued that the goal, regardless the political and social consequences that are certain to come as a result of an overturning of Roe v. Wade, is the cessation of abortions in this country. However, we know that where there’s a will, there is always a way. And certainly, if the people in general want abortion on demand, they will find a way to get it. Already the pro-abortion side of this nation’s legislative branch is hard at work looking for work-arounds to a potential overturning of Roe v. Wade.

The Problem Goes Beyond Abortion

As terrible as abortion is, and it is absolutely horrendous and evil, Father also calls His human creation to pay attention to the those in our society that are less fortunate then us; who need our help. To pay attention and adhere to the weightier matters of Torah such as “justice, mercy and faith” (Mat. 23:23). It’s so easy to get caught up in the abortion dialogue in this nation, yet overlook the other evils that are overwhelming American society:

Murder
Fornication
Adultery
Homosexuality
Thefts and Robbery
Violence against others, especially against those who cannot protect themselves
Indifference and even abuse against our seniors
Neglect in teaching our children in the righteous ways they must live
Etc.

The Courts Cannot Legislate the Condition of the Human Heart

Before any overturn of something like a Roe v. Wade becomes a reality in this country, and before we start popping the corks on congratulatory and celebratory spiritual champagne drinking, let us recognize that this is only the beginning of the hard work that lays before the Body of Messiah. The critical work of the Great Commission must be doubled down upon by Yahoshua’s disciples (Mat. 28:19-20). We must work while it is still day, because the dark days ahead will preclude and prohibit such activity (Joh. 9:4).

With our proclaiming of the Great Commission, comes our teaching of Yah’s Way of Life to those who answer the call to Messianic Discipleship. The Church Triumphant has failed miserably in this endeavor. For Yah expects His servants to not be in a state of strife with society, but be gentle unto one and all, apt to teach as the apostle writes, and patient even with those who contend with them (2 Tim. 2:24-25). Yah’s perspective on things and issues such as abortion, LGBTQ, the treatment of the less fortunate among us, must be widely taught and then modeled by us to the world. Otherwise, successes such as an overturning of Roe v. Wade will have little to no meaning. Because if the hearts of those affected by such things are not turned towards Yah, they will find newer and more innovative ways to further their evil beliefs and lifestyles. It is simply the nature of humanity to do such things.

Closing Thought

Therefore, I will end this by asserting that there cannot be a true overturning of Roe v. Wade by any legislative body in this nation, unless there is an overturning of the hearts and minds and souls of the people of this nation from themselves and the god of this world, to that of Yehovah Elohim, through His Son Yahoshua Messiah.

Faithfully