The Torah of the Cities of Refuge–Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 125

by | Mar 23, 2024 | Blog, Podcasts

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

 

Shabbat Shalom.

 

This week’s Torah Reading, contained in Numbers 35:9-36:13, is the 125th portion of our 3-year Torah Portion reading cycle. And for our discussion today, we will focus only on verses 9 through 34 of chapter 35. This is, by the way, the final reading in our 3-year Torah Reading cycle in the Book of Numbers (aka Bemidbar).

 

I’ve entitled this teaching: The Torah of the Cities of Refuge. It will be my thoughts and reflections on Torah Reading 125.

 

Key Terms and Concepts

 

  • Refuge (aka asylum): miq-lat
  • Die or dying: mwt (mem-vav-tav)
  • Kill or killer or murder or murderer; manslaying or manslayer: rot-zah. In our reading, Yehovah distinguishing for us the difference between murder/intentional homicide and what we call here in the West, manslaughter, accidental, or unintentional homicide. Yah’s Torah of the Cities of Refuge clarifies the distinction between these two forms of killings/homicides. Besides distinguishing between intentional and unintentional homicide, Yehovah, through His instructions on the Cities of Refuge, further emphasized the extreme value that He places on life. Yah’s extreme value for life must serve as a mandate for us to value life as He does. We value life in a Godly manner when we keep Yah’s commandment to love our neighbor as ourselves (Lev 19.18) and to steadfastly enact righteous justice in our communities.
  • Redeem; redeemer; avenger such as a blood avenger; to reclaim as one’s own; to right a wrong or restore equilibrium: ga’al
  • Blood; the shedding of blood; bloodguilt: dam
  • Bribe; ransom (given to one who holds sway in a case to avoid impending judgment or punishment against a guilty party): ko’fair (ko’per)
  • Strike; smite; to strike someone dead; to hit or injure another: neekah
  • To flee (such as flee to a refuge city): nun-vav-semach
  • Enmity or hostility: ehvah
  • Witness: ‘ed (ai-ed)

 

The Torah of the Cities of Refuge (arey hammiqlat)

 

Our reading today starts off with the command to choose for ourselves six cities to serve as Cities of Refuge for the commonwealth of Yisra’el:

 

9And יהוה spoke to Mosheh, saying, 10“Speak to the children of Yisra’ěl, and say to them, ‘When you pass over the Yarděn into the land of Kena‛an, 11then you shall choose cities to be cities of refuge for you, that the man-slayer who struck someone mistakenly shall flee there.

12‘And they shall be cities of refuge for you from the revenger, and the man-slayer is not to die until he stands before the congregation for right-ruling. 13‘And of the cities which you give, six are to be cities of refuge. (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Nu 35:9–13.)

 

Our Haftarah Reading, contained within Joshua 20:1-6, names these six designated Cities of Refuge. Those cities were Bezer, Ramoth-Gilead, Golan, Hebron, Shechem, and Kedesh.

 

Besides these named cities, Yehovah gave instructions on the proper use of these refuge cities by those innocents seeking asylum or protection from a blood avenger. A blood avenger, by the way, was the direct male next-of-kin who, responding to the news of the murder or killing of their loved one, pursues their killer or murderer and avenges their death.

 

We established the six Cities of Refuge at the command of Yehovah. Their purpose was to prevent the shedding of innocent blood in the Commonwealth of Yisra’el (Deu 19.1-13). The shedding of innocent blood incurs bloodguilt upon a people and upon their Land. If a sanctioned court proceeding determines that the individual who killed the person in question did so with murderous intent, they would hand over the murderer to the blood avenger for execution. This would purge/expiate the bloodguilt that hung over the community and the Land, restoring God’s grace (Deu 4:41-43).

 

We find from last week’s reading that Yah tied these six cities or attached these six cities to the 48 cities that were given to the Levites (Num  35.1-8 of Torah Reading 124). These cities comprised pasturelands for the Levites’ domestic animals and their personal possessions (35.1-3). The confines of these cities are recorded in 35.4-5.

 

It makes sense that Yah required these six refuge cities be numbered among the cities belonging to the Levites. At this time in our history, the Levites served as our intermediaries or intercessors to Yehovah.

 

So, why did Yah command us to set aside these six Levite cities to serve as places of refuge for innocent killers to flee to?

 

  1. Yah’s steadfast grace and perfect justice and righteousness reveal that He cares about the life of the innocent soul. Yah is not willing that any should perish, be it in this life or the life to come (cf. 2 Pet 3.9).
  2. So as “to not defile the land on which we are living as He, Yehovah, is living in the midst of the land and in our midst” (35.34). This reality goes back to Yah’s demand that we ensure and maintain the absolute physical and spiritual cleanness/purity of our persons and our surroundings while He dwells in our midst (5.1-6.27).

 

The shedding of innocent blood in the Land, by virtue of Yah’s holiness and righteousness, and His demand that we, His people, also be holy, causes the Land to fall into an unclean state. Our God will not dwell amid either physical or spiritual filth. And the only way to return the Land to its formerly clean state — a state that is acceptable to Yah — is for the shed innocent blood to be atoned for by the shedding of the murderer’s blood. This principle not only applies to the blood that is shed by a murder victim, but it also applies to the blood that is shed when an innocent killer’s blood is shed by a blood avenger. Thus, Yah gave us the Torah of the Cities of Refuge to prevent the execution of an innocent soul.

 

Either way, we were commanded to ensure that the commission of such crimes did not sully (i.e. bring about uncleanness to) the Land in which we and Yehovah dwell. To forsake such righteous justice and atonement is to risk Yah abandoning us and the Land, and we, as His people, being exiled from the Land by Yah (Lev 18.28; Eze 36.17-18; Hos 4.2-3).

 

There is little wonder why this and other western nations, where the people once honored the God of Avraham, Yitschaq, and Ya’achov, find themselves cursed as they are today. Innocent blood floods the streets of these nations and cities: From the millions of aborted babies, to the countless homicides and crimes that these nations’ judicial systems allow to go unpunished every single day, this and all other supposed Judeo-Christian nations of the world are cursed with a curse. But Yah will recompense the evil that has brought about the unacceptable filth that covers over the nation cities of this world, including the modern nation state of Yisra’el.

 

Many of the provisions of this parashah that we are reading today have been adopted and practiced by most Western nations of the world (at least at some point in their history). Yet the leaders and people of this and the other nations of the world have forsaken these God-given provisions in the name of and the religion we know today as “wokeness” and “progressiveness.” A new humanistic righteousness has replaced Godly-righteousness, and Yah has had about a belly full of this foolishness. Judgment is coming to this nation and to this world. And only those of us who possess the testimony of Yahoshua HaMashiyach and keep Yah’s instructions in righteousness will be spared and delivered from the wrath to come (Rev 12.17; 14.12).

 

The Torah of the Cities of Refuge applied to both the native born Yisra’elite and the foreigner/stranger/sojourner who worshipped the God of Avraham, Yitschaq, and Ya’achov and who lived within the commonwealth of Yisra’el (35.15). And so it stands as it was when we first received Yah’s covenant proposal: Abba Yah asserted that His Torah — His instructions in righteousness — applied to all Yisra’el and every Yisra’elite whether they be native born or the sojourning stranger in our midst (Exo 12.49).

 

There is a prophetic shadow picture embedded in the Torah of the Cities of Refuge, in particular, the aspect of the law that involved the death of the High Priest effecting the release of the manslayer from the City of Refuge that once provided him protection from a blood avenger’s wrathful execution. Freedom — release from the mandated confines of the refuge city he temporarily lived in — came to the manslayer only upon the death of the Cohen Gadol.

 

We find in 35.27 that the killer or innocent manslayer was not under “house arrest” while residing in one city of refuge. He was, however, confined to the defined limits or borders of that city (Barry, John D. et al., ESV Study Bible; Logos 10 edition). While residing within the borders of the City of Refuge, where the city’s elders had acquitted him of murder, he was protected from the murderous wrath of the blood avenger. If the manslayer wanted to live, he had to remain within the confines of that refuge city until the sitting High Priest (aka the Cohen HaGadol at the time of his trial) died. Upon the death of the Cohen Gadol, the manslayer was free to leave that City of Refuge and return to his home. To defy this provision that offered the manslayer protection meant that he would be subject to the wrath-driven vengeance of the blood avenger, regardless of his innocence.

 

The [atoning] death of our Cohen HaGadol has made us, as believers and followers of Yahoshua HaMashiyach, free. Unlike the innocent manslayer who is granted refuge from the wrath of the blood avenger and ultimately achieves complete freedom and release upon the death of the presiding High Priest, we, as believers and followers of Yahoshua HaMashiyach, are feloniously guilty and deserving of the penalty of death and separation from the Creator of all things. Yet, the wholeness and perfection of our High Priest’s sacrifice frees and releases us from our death sentence, despite our overwhelming guilt.

 

The politically motivated so-called sanctuary cities of this nation are receiving attention, making this topic and reading timely, if you ask me. These cities are finding themselves regretting their claims to be sanctuary cities because of the devastating financial and criminal effects brought to their cities by a large influx of undocumented migrants. The obvious difference between this nation’s sanctuary cities and Yehovah’s mandated Cities of Refuge is that the leaders of this nation’s sanctuary cities are not of Yehovah. They are a rebellious lot. And now, they and their constituents are having to eat crow, so to speak, and face the consequences of their self-serving actions.

 

Yah Requires at Least Three Witnesses to Convict and Ensure Righteous Justice is Rendered

 

One of the greatest principles related to righteous judgment to be gleaned from our reading is that of Yah, requiring the testimony of at least two or more witnesses to convict someone of murder. In fact, Yah stipulated:

 

30‘Whoever strikes a being, the murderer shall be executed by the mouth of witnesses, but one witness does not bear witness against someone to die. (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Nu 35:30.)

 

6 ⌊On the evidence of⌋ two or three witnesses ⌊the person shall be put to death⌋. The person shall not be put to death by the mouth of one witness. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Dt 17:6.)

 

The testimony of a single witness may not be used to convict⌋ with respect to any crime and for any wrongdoing in any offense that a person committed; on the ⌊evidence⌋ of two witnesses or on the ⌊evidence⌋ of three witnesses ⌊a charge shall be sustained⌋. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Dt 19:15.)

 

The righteous principle of establishing that a crime has indeed been committed through the testimony of two or more witnesses extends over to non-criminal matters, such as in resolving strife or disputes in the Body of Messiah:

 

15 “Now if your brother sins against you, go correct him between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. 16 But if he does not listen, take with you in addition one or two others, so that by ⌊the testimony⌋ of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. 17 And if he refuses to listen to them, tell it* to the church. But if he refuses to listen to the church also, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Mt 18:15–17.)

 

Thus, our Master extended the Torah precept of establishing guilt by the testimony of two witnesses to all matters of contention between brethren. (cf. 2 Cor 13.1; Heb 10.28)

 

The Torah of the Cities of Refuge serves as a prophetic shadow picture of the Person and ministries of Yahoshua our Messiah. He is our refuge. Death and Yehovah’s righteous wrath awaits and pursues after those who do not flee to the refuge that Yehovah offers to the world through His Son, Yahoshua HaMashiyach.

 

 Innocent or Guilt Determined by Righteous Judges

The intent of the killer must be determined by the refuge city’s elder-judges (35:16-21). Within these verses, Yehovah provided us examples of actions that constitute intentional homicide or murder.

 

Our judges (i.e. “edah,” which, according to Deu 19.11-12; cf. 16.18; 17.8, must consist of the elders of the city of refuge) determined the innocence or guilt of a killer based on their intent to cause deadly harm. The elders would rely on the testimony of two or more witnesses to arrive at their judgment. If the judges determined the killer did not murder the deceased (i.e. did not intentionally kill the deceased), they would remand the killer to the guardianship of the sanctuary city he first took refuge in. He was to remain there until the death of the presiding Cohen Gadol (aka the High Priest), at which time the manslaying was free to return to their home. If the court deemed the killer guilty of intentional homicide, the murderer was to be handed over to the deceased next of kin (aka the go’el or kinsman redeemer). The go’el was the deceased kinsman responsible (i.e. obligated) to represent the deceased family in avenging the murder of the loved one.

 

There is certainly some Messianic application to be seen here. Our Go’el, Yahoshua Messiah, stands as our redeemer, our deliverer, and the sole being to ransom us from the evil one and the Kingdom of Darkness.

 

Just to make sure we’re all on the same page, convicted murderers were not given sanctuary in any of the six cities of refuge. There was no provision in Torah for a murderer to be spared execution through him paying a ransom to either the blood avenger or the judges (35.31).

 

The Necessity Mission of the Blood Avenger

 

The “blood avenger,” or the “redeemer of blood,” despite the bad press he receives from a casual read of this parashah, serves an important purpose as it relates to restoring the righteous equilibrium, — wellbeing — functioning, of our commonwealth. When the redeemer of blood avenges the murder of their loved one, he “restores the status quo” of his family, community, and the Land” (Hegg, Tim, Commentary on Numbers; pg. 225). He brings about necessary justice to the evil that has been perpetrated upon his family, the community, and the Land through his actions. This same principle of restoring the equilibrium or returning a people and the Land back to its righteous status-quo is founded in the concept of the kinsman-redeemer in the Book of Ruth; is like the soul who redeems their brethren out of debtor’s slavery or debtor’s prison (Lev 25.48); and similar to the buying back of one’s inherited land that was, out of some necessity, sold to another (Lev 25.25). (Hegg, ibid., p. 225).

 

The shedding of innocent blood knocks the deceased’s family, the community, and the Land off kilter. And in order to right the situation and restore the righteous equilibrium that befell the people and the Land, the blood avenger must mete out righteous justice.  

 

Now, that being all said, it should be obvious to us all that we do not live under a theocracy (i.e. a government that is ruled by God and His Torah). We instead live in a hollowed form of a republic and we are subject to the laws of this land whether we like it or not.

 

The Shedding of Innocent Blood Defiles the Land and Separates our Community from Yehovah

 

Lastly, we find in verses 33 and 34 that the shedding of innocent blood defiles the Land and separates our community from Yehovah.

 

33‘And do not profane the land where you are, for blood profanes the land, and the land is not pardoned for the blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it. 34‘And do not defile the land which you inhabit, in the midst of which I dwell, for I, יהוה, am dwelling in the midst of the children of Yisra’ěl.’ ” (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Nu 35:33–34.)

 

37 They even sacrificed their sons and daughters to the demons, 38 and they poured out innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and so the land was defiled with the blood. 39 And they became unclean by their works, and were unfaithful in their deeds. 40 So Yahweh’s anger burned against his people,     and he abhorred his inheritance. 41 Then he gave them into the hand of the nations, and those who hated them ruled over them. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Ps 106:37–41.)

 

Atonement must be made for all transgressions — one way or the other — so that the bloodguilt may be lifted from the people and the Land and the community’s relationship with Yehovah be restored. The shedding of innocent blood defiles the Land and, as we previously discussed, Yehovah will not dwell among us when we and our Land are unclean. And if there is just one thing we take away from this Torah Reading today, it should be that if we desire to have Yehovah perpetually dwell in our midst, we must be clean. Our actions, our bodies, our spirits, and our surroundings must always be in a pure state. We ourselves cannot purify our personal world. We must rely on the efficacious, atoning sacrifice of our Master Yahoshua Messiah to purify our individual world. It is imperative that we repent of any and all sins that we commit and stop sinning. Clean up our individual environment, both physical and spiritual. Utilize the power and strength of Yah’s Set-Apart Spirit to help us overcome those strongholds that so easily beset us and cause defilement in our lives.

 

Yah desperately wants to commune with us. But Yah will not compromise His holiness to commune with us. That’s why He has provided us with the means to make that communion between Him and us even more possible. We just have to take Abba Yah up on His offer to help us clean ourselves. Hold Yah to His offer to help bring equilibrium and righteousness to our lives. The Psalmist wrote: O taste and see that the LORD is good: Blessed is the man that trusteth in him. (The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ps 34:8.)

 

Today, we are beyond measure blessed to have full access to the atonement that Yehovah has put in place for those who are called by His Name. That atonement provision is now made possible through the Person and atoning ministry of our Master Yahoshua Messiah (Mat 20.28; Rom 3.23-26; 5.9; Eph 1.7; Col 1.14; 1 Joh 2.2; 4.10).

Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works or Keeping Torah in Favor of Faith? Part 2 of The New Testament Validates the Necessity of Torah Living for God’s People Series

by | Mar 18, 2022 |

This is “Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works in Favor of Faith?” This will be part 2 of our Paul Officially Validates Torah Living for God’s People series.   Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 4:1-8. But we will pay...

read more

Biblical Rosh Hashanah 2022 Update

by | Mar 3, 2022 |

Starting off, I would be remiss if I did not connect this update with my last post entitled "Why I Keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar and not the Other Popular Messianic Calendars." In that post, I gave five reasons why I keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar....

read more

The High Expectations for God’s People to Fulfill His Will and Purpose — Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 122

by | Mar 2, 2024 | Blog, Podcasts

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

Shabbat Shalom beloved of Yeshua Messiah.

 

This week’s Torah Reading is the 122nd reading of our 3-year Torah Portion reading cycle. Our reading is found in Numbers 32:1-42.

 

I’ve entitled this teaching: The High Expectations for God’s People to Fulfill His Will and Purpose — Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 122.

____________________________________________

A Quick Overview of the Transjordan Region

 

Gilead is east of the Jordan River. Our reading records that Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh would ultimately occupy this region. Many centuries prior to the timeframe of our reading, Scripture records that Ya’achov fled here when he covertly left with his family and belongings from Laban, his father-in-law (Gen 31). It is here that scripture records that Yosef was sold to an Ishmaelite caravan by his brothers (Gen 37).

 

Beyond these patriarchs, more contemporaneously with our present reading, it is here that we seized this land from Sihon as recorded in Numbers 21:2-32. Recall that he was the Amorite king who refused to allow us to short-cut through his territory (i.e. Num 21:21-23; Deu 2:26-37; Jug 11:19-16). Scripture reveals Yah hardened Sihon’s heart such that he would not agree to our request, somewhat like He did to Pharoah in the hardening of his heart. And, of course, it turns out that his hardened heart, again like Pharaoh before him, would not bode well for him as we would destroy him and seize his kingdom (Num 21:24-25). (Don’t mess with Yah’s chosen ones, especially when they are walking according to His Ways, Will, and Purpose.)

From there Yah instructed us to destroy Og of Bashan and seize his kingdom (Num 21:33-35; Neh 9:22; Psa 135.10-12). And as we will discuss here today, these lands would be given to our tribes of Gad, Reuben, and the half-tribe of Manasseh at their request and upon completion of their obligation to assist their other tribal brethren in conquering Canaan proper.

 

Overall, we of this 2nd generation coming out of Egypt were preparing to go in and conquer Canaan and this request by our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren, we will see, came as a surprise to Moshe. It was not part of the originally known plan that we, as Yah’s chosen nation, would go into Canaan proper, conquer it, and take possession of it.

 

Our Gadite, Reubenite Brethren State Their Case for Wanting to Possess Gilead

 

So, our Gadite and Reubenite brethren, along with the half-tribe of Manasseh, approached Moshe with the petition that they would settle in the region of Gilead which included the lands formerly ruled by Sihon (i.e. of the Amorites), Og of Bashan, and Balak of Moab.

 

Our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren stated their case to Moshe with seemingly warm cooperation and peaceful intent. Turns out that these three tribes were, at this time, in possession of vast numbers of livestock (i.e. Hebrew “miqneh”) and the lands they had their hearts set on to the east of the Jordan (aka the Transjordan) seemed to them perfect for raising and maintaining their vast animal stocks (32:1).

 

Moshe’s Concern — Considering the Hebrew Terms “Heni” and “Tenu’ah”

 

Consequently, Moshe was concerned that if the tribes of Gad, Reuben, and Manasseh were given the green light to settle in the lands they expressed interest in possessing that we might have another incident akin to the “Spies Incident” of Numbers 13 on our hands. If you recall beloved, a significant portion of our nation refused to go in and take possession of the Land as Yah instructed us to do. Our nation’s refusal was based on the negative report of the spies that Moshe sent to reconnoiter the Land. Of those 12-spies, only Caleb and Joshua gave us a positive report and strongly encouraged us to obey Yah and go in and take the Land. Most of us refused to listen to Caleb’s and Joshua’s words and we as a nation rebelled against Yehovah and Moshe. This historic incident falls within the Hebrew concepts of “Heni” and “Tenu’ah.”

 

In his initial presumption that the petitioning tribes of Gad, Reuben, and Manasseh were up to some “monkey-business” (i.e. that their intentions for not going in to possess the Land with their other tribal brethren was somehow similar to the intentions we had as a nation in response to the 10 spies’ negative report). So, Moshe being the astute and discerning leader that He was says to these Gadite and Reubenite leaders:

 

“Why would you turn (i.e. “heni” — nullify or retract as well as turning the thoughts and will of another from their intended will) the will of the Yisra’elites?” Baruch A. Levine addresses this Hebrew term “heni” as used here by Moshe within the general context of annulling vows, oaths, and obligations. Mr. Levine also introduces us to the term “tenu’ ah, which is a situation where an individual or a people denies and treats the Will (and Plan) of Yehovah as though it was nothing or something to be scoffed at or dismissed. Clearly, Moshe didn’t want any repeat of any such foolishness as we experienced in response to the spy caper many years prior. (AB-Numbers 21-36 — A New Translation with Introduction and Translation — AYB4A)

 

Thus, Moshe brings up that spy incident and the ensuing punishment we endured for adhering to the negative voice of the 10-spies. Our “tenu’ah” condemned us to wander in the wilderness until the first Exodus generation died out, except for Caleb and Joshua (reference Num 14.29). Levine suggests that with our previous “tenu’ah” in the forefront of Moshe’s memory that maybe that same “tenu’ah” might be behind Reuben’s and Gad’s desire to remain in the lands east of the Jordan; that they viewed Yah’s promises and plans for our nation as “illegitimate.” For “to remain east of the Jordan was, in effect, to remain outside the Promised Land, to refuse to undertake its conquest.” (Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21–36: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, vol. 4A, Anchor Yale Bible (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2008), 487.)

 

Why is this such a big deal? you may ask. When we disregard Yah’s promises and instructions, which are connected to His commands to obey Him and to go and do what will bring about the fulfillment of those covenantal promises, we symbolically communicate to Him and the world that we are not committed to Him. When we do not commit ourselves to Him as His covenant people, we displease and upset Him (vss 10 and 11). Again, this is related to our reneging on our promises and commitments (i.e. our vows, oaths, and obligations as we discussed in Torah Reading 121).

 

So, as a follow-up to our previous reading, the importance of keeping our vows, oaths, and obligations is once more reiterated in this story. To tenu’ah and heni the vows, oaths, and obligations that we make to Yehovah and to others is a transgression of Yah’s Torah (i.e. it is a sin). Dare I say that to nullify our promises is a showstopper as it relates to our making it into the kingdom? I say, beloved, that it is imperative that we repent of any such acts in our lives and seek Yah’s forgiveness. And from there, we need to correct the denials and nullifications (i.e. the tenu’ah’s and heni’s) in our lives to the best of our abilities and not repeat those sins again.

 

 

The Hearts of the Gadites and Reubenites Regarding This Matter

 

On the surface, it seems that the hearts and loyalties of our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren were in the right place, at least as far as the text suggests. I’ll get into some perspectives of Jewish Thinkers who thought otherwise later in our discussion.

 

After some slightly contentious back and forth dialogue with Moshe on the matter, our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren agreed to fight alongside their other tribal brethren until Canaan was under our complete control and possession (32:16-19). These tribes’ willingness to obey Yehovah led Moshe to agree to their terms for taking possession of the lands east of the Jordan, outside Canaan proper (32:20-24).

 

Nevertheless, Moshe warned these tribes that if they failed to keep their word to assist their fellow Israelites in conquering Canaan, they would have to answer to Yehovah as it would be a transgression of Yah’s instructions (32:23). Indeed, these tribes would fulfill their obligation to Yehovah and the entire nation of Yisra’el when they will fight alongside their tribal brethren to conquer and take possession of Canaan as recorded in Joshua 4 and 22.

 

Thus, Moshe agreed to the Gadites’ and Reubenites’ proposal that they would fight alongside their brethren when they deployed to conquer Canaan (32:17). In the interim, the Gadites, Reubenites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh began to make a life for themselves in Sihon’s and Og’s former lands (32.16). More so, these three tribes vowed to deploy ahead of their brethren who would settle in Canaan under the leadership of Joshua. They vowed to unite in armed force with their brethren in the conquest of Canaan. And once Canaan was fully conquered and their brethren were received their inheritance of land (i.e. “nahalah”) to the satisfaction of Yehovah, then the Reubenites, Gadites, and Manasseh tribes would return to their homes in the lands east of the Jordan (32:18). These would also not lay any claim to any of the lands west of the Jordan (32:19).

 

Jewish Thinkers Weigh in on This Subject

 

I was surprised to learn just how much thought the ancient Jewish Thinkers put into this story. I want to share some of their thoughts with you for purposes of expanding our perspective on how our ancient and modern Jewish brethren see the merits of this story.

 

We find that towards the conclusion of the back and forth that occurred between Moshe and the Gadites and Reubenites, before Moshe agreed to these tribes’ petition and to ensure that the record on the matter was firmly established, that these tribes would face serious consequences if they did not keep their vow or obligation to fight alongside their other tribal brethren in the conquest of Canaan. Moshe warned these tribes:

 

But if you do not do so (i.e. you do not keep you word to fight alongside and help secure the promised Land for your brethren), behold, you have sinned against Yahweh, and know that your sin will find you. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Nu 32:23.)

 

The Talmudist Thinkers labeled this conditional formulation “tena’ i kapul.” “Tena’ i kapul” is a provision that is incorporated in most binding Hebrew contracts and written obligations. Such provisions “spell out both the positive and negative outcomes” of the contract or obligation (Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21–36: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, vol. 4A, Anchor Yale Bible (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2008), 491.) In other words, if you do such-and-such a thing as you promised, then such-and-such a thing will happen. However, if you don’t do such-and-such a thing (i.e. you fail to keep your word), then a certain bad thing will happen.

 

Consider this Mishnaic commentary on “tena’ i kapul” in relation to our reading:

 

  1. Meir says, “Any condition which is not stated as is the condition of the sons of Gad and the sons of Reuben [that is, in both negative and positive formulations], is no condition, “since it says, ‘And Moses said to them, “If the children of Gad and the children of Reuben will pass over” (Num. 32:29). And it is written, “And if they will not pass over armed” (Num. 32:20).’ ” R. Hananiah b. Gamaliel says, “The matter had to be stated in just that way, for if not, it would have been implied that even in the Land of Canaan they would not inherit land.” (Qiddusin 3:4; Jacob Neusner, The Babylonian Talmud: A Translation and Commentary, vol. 12 (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2011), 295.)

 

Thus, in our reading, Moshe stipulates that if our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren keep their obligation to Yehovah and their brethren by arming themselves and fighting alongside their other tribal brethren on the west side of the Jordan until all military operations have been successfully completed, then they would be free to return to those lands that they’d chosen for their home. If these stated conditions were met, then the land they desire to dwell in the Transjordan would be granted unto them as their homeland. (32:20-22) However, if our Gadite, Reubenite, and Manasseh brethren reneged on their obligation to take part in the conquering of Canaan alongside their other tribal brethren, then they would have committed a serious sin and their sin would most certainly find them. (32:23) And thus, the leaders of Gad and Reuben officially agreed to fulfill their responsibilities in the Land, and most importantly, obey Yehovah’s instructions regarding the taking of Canaan. (32:25-27)

 

Verses 33-38 entail the official land grant to Gad, Reuben, and the half-tribe of Manasseh.

 

Now all of this was well and good in my mind until I recently came upon Torah Resources Tim Hegg’s Commentary on our reading (“Studies in the Torah — Numbers; Tacoma, Washington; 2016).

 

Mr. Hegg, who I greatly respect and who’s many written Torah resources I routinely reference in most, if not all, of my Torah studies and postings, introduces to his readers a rather negative perspective on the actions of the Gadites, Reubenites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh here in our reading and he shows in his commentary what some of the ancient Jewish Thinkers thought about their land petition. Turns out that the opinion of some ancient Jewish Thinkers towards the Gadites, Reubenites, and Manasseh was that their hearts were evil. According to these ancient thinkers, these tribes eventually suffered loss because they selfishly sought to separate themselves from their other brethren in response to their greed and sense of self-worth that was not in keeping with the will and purpose of Elohim.

 

Hegg illustrates this shocking perspective by recording the following Midrash commentary:

 

“Three gifts exist in the world: wisdom, valor and wealth. Whoever has merited one, can attain all the world’s delights. When is this so? When these gifts come from heaven by a means in keeping with Torah. (In other words, when one walks in Torah as they should, they will be appropriately blessed and receive their heart’s desires. Continuing.) Otherwise, they are worthless (i.e. getting worldly blessings is worthless if they are not obtained through the provisions that Yehovah spells out in His Torah. Continuing). There are two wealthy men in the world (i.e. two types of unsavory wealthy souls in the world), one of Israel — Korach — and the other of the nations (i.e. the goyim) — Haman (i.e. infamous in the Esther story) — and both were destroyed. Why? Because their gift was not from Hashem, but something they grabbed for themselves. (And here’s the kicker) It is just so with Gad and Reuven. Rich, blessed with much flocks (i.e. our forefathers measured wealth at times according to how much livestock one owned), they loved their wealth and dwelt outside the Land of Israel. Therefore they were the first tribes to be exiled…What caused this if not their isolating themselves from their brethren for material gain” (Mid. Rab. Num 22.7)?

 

Turns out that according to scripture, it was the tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali that were the first tribes to suffer exile at the hands of the Assyrian onslaught (2 Kin 15:29). Some Jewish thinkers give this oversight a pass by taking a position that these tribes’ (i.e. Gad’s and Reuben’s) exile was their living outside the Land of Promise (i.e. a self-imposed exile if you will). (But why quibble over scriptural facts when you are a renowned Jewish sage, right?) But clearly, this thinker held a rather nasty, biased view of our Gadite and Reubenite brethren because these established their homes in the Transjordanian region as opposed to joining their other tribal brethren in Canaan, west of the Jordan.

 

Interestingly, these ancient Jewish thinkers didn’t stop in their criticism of these tribes’ perceived greed-driven actions. Some thinkers criticized them for their lack of faith/belief in Yah. They note that the leaders of these tribes failed to mention Yehovah in their petition to Moshe, this in contrast with Moshe’s mention of Yehovah some five times in his discourse with them over this land-grant issue (Num 32:20-22). The thinkers argue that these leaders were solely focused on their wealth and did not see any true need for Yah or any relationship with their other tribal brethren.

 

And not to be done with their criticism of Gad and Reuben in relationship to their perceived faithlessness and materialism, other thinkers saw these as having an inaccurate understanding of Yah’s Plan for Israel and their conquering of the Land. These, the thinkers contended, believed that Yehovah was going to miraculously eliminate the inhabitants of Canaan and simply hand the land over to their other tribal brethren. Thus, Reuben and Gad saw no need to get involved in that which Yehovah clearly had under control and within His sovereign purview. Hegg, in response to this criticism asserts: “The conquest of the Land would be done through Yehovah’s mighty hand, but it would require warfare: ‘I will deliver the inhabitants of the Land into the hand…’ To enjoy Yah’s covenant promises requires obedient participation” (ibid., p. 201). Amein to that, I say.

 

Hegg gives wide credence to the criticisms of the Jewish Thinkers but stops short of fully committing himself to their perspectives. His major criticism of the Reubenites, Gadites, and Manasseh is centered on their perceived self-centeredness and initial lack of concern for the wellbeing of their Israelite brethren. I understand his well-worded position and I, to a lesser or greater extent, somewhat agree with him. However, I do not go so far as to suggest that these three tribes were sinful in their petition to settle in the Transjordan as opposed to Canaan proper. Seems to me that if Yehovah was truly upset with Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh, He would not have permitted the arrangement to go through as recorded in our reading. If these tribes were about some monkey-business and were willing to sell out their other tribal brethren in order to settle on land that was more conducive to their present livestock situation, Moshe certainly addressed and put a stop to such concerns. I believe what happened in our reading regarding these three tribes and the land they wanted for their homes was within Yah’s permissive will.

 

What I mean by Yah’s permissive will is that, although the actions of an individual or a group of individuals may not fall within Yah’s original plans, He makes allowances for certain actions of these individuals or group of people to take place. Unfortunately, some of those actions may have far-reaching, generational consequences. A prime example of such consequences coming out of those things Yah allows through His permissive will is realized in the practice of polygamy that so many of the ancients committed themselves to. I think with these three tribes, their desire to settle in lands just outside the Land of Promise was not in Yah’s original plan, but these tribes’ actions were not contentious to Yah’s plan and will. At the very least, this is not mentioned in our text. These three tribes agreed to fulfill their obligations, and that seems to have satisfied Moshe, and more importantly, Yehovah in this matter.

 

The take-aways from this week’s reading are many:

 

  • Yah requires us to fulfill the vows, promises, oaths, and obligations that we make to Him and to our fellowman. This is a carryover, of course, from last week’s reading.

 

  • Despite the many promises that Yah has made to us, His chosen ones, we are still required/obligated to act when He says act and do whatever He directs us to do at the time He says move. There are no free lunches in Yah’s great work of redemption, restoration, and salvation. So, we are going to have to obey His Words and listen to His still small voice, and follow His lead as He so provides and directs.

 

  • Despite my disagreements with the ancient Jewish Thinkers as it relates to their criticisms of the Gadites and Reubenites’ perceived sinful behavior, I will concede that they provide us with food for thought. It behooves us, as Yah’s set apart people, to always keep Yah and His will in front of our own desires, plans, and will. In fact, Yah’s will and purpose should always be our purpose; our will; our desire. Furthermore, we should always obey Yah’s Torah of loving Him with our whole being and loving our neighbor as we love ourselves such that we place Yah and the wellbeing of our brothers and sisters ahead of our own interests. Last, our material possessions must be made fully subject to the will, purpose, and plans of Yah. Greed and selfishness have no place in the hearts, minds, and souls of Yah’s people. If left unchecked, greed and selfishness will adversely impact our intimate covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe. In fact, in opposition to greed and selfishness potentially overtaking His disciples at any time in their walk, Master Yeshua directed us to store up our treasures in heaven where neither moth nor rust corrupts and where thieves do not break through nor steal (Mat 6:20). And if our wealth gets in the way of our relationship with our Master Yeshua and in the way of our commission as His emissaries, He instructs us to sell that which we possess and give the proceeds to the poor, and follow Him (Mat 19:21; Mar 10:21; Luk 18:22).

 

 

A Serious Warning Against Continuing Deliberate Sin

 

As citizens of heaven and sons of the coming Malchut Elohim, we know how we are supposed to behave, and those of us who know better are always expected to do better. Yah holds us accountable for always doing the right and just thing. Sin must be given NO place in our lives as our apostolic reading this week so poignantly declares through the teachings of the writer of Hebrews:

 

26 For if* we keep on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment and a fury of fire that is about to consume the adversaries. 28 Anyone who rejected the law of Moses dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 How much worse punishment do you think the person will be considered worthy of who treats with disdain the Son of God and who considers ordinary the blood of the covenant by which he was made holy and who insults the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know the one who said, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay,” and again, “The Lord will judge his people.” 31 It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Heb 10:26–31.)

 

Have a blessed and overcoming week in Yeshua Messiah, beloved. Shabbat Shalom, shavu’atov, take care.

Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works or Keeping Torah in Favor of Faith? Part 2 of The New Testament Validates the Necessity of Torah Living for God’s People Series

by | Mar 18, 2022 |

This is “Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works in Favor of Faith?” This will be part 2 of our Paul Officially Validates Torah Living for God’s People series.   Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 4:1-8. But we will pay...

read more

Biblical Rosh Hashanah 2022 Update

by | Mar 3, 2022 |

Starting off, I would be remiss if I did not connect this update with my last post entitled "Why I Keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar and not the Other Popular Messianic Calendars." In that post, I gave five reasons why I keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar....

read more

What God Expects From Us When We Make Vows — Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 121

by | Feb 23, 2024 | Blog, Podcasts

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

Shabbat Shalom beloved of Yeshua Messiah.

 

This week’s Torah Reading is the 121th portion of the 3-year Torah Portion reading cycle. Num 30:1-31:54 contains this week’s Torah Reading.

 

I’ve entitled this teaching: What God Expects from us When We Make Vows — Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 121

 

(30:1-16) — The Torah Regarding the Making of Vows and Oaths

 

The Torah regarding the making and keeping of vows, oaths, and obligations is a carryover from the instructions Yah gave us regarding the required sacrifices and offerings we are to render on various set-apart/feast days (i.e. Torah Reading 120):

 

39‘These you prepare to יהוה at your appointed times, besides your vowed offerings and your voluntary offerings (some English translations render as votive offerings), as your ascending offerings and your grain offerings, as your drink offerings and your peace offerings.’ (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Nu 29:39.)

 

 

The Expectations for the Vows – Oaths – Obligations That Men Make

 

We cannot revoke or nullify the vows, oaths, and obligations that we, as men, make unto Yehovah. They are binding, especially upon men. To swear a vow or oath is no small matter, but is done on one’s life, whether male or female (vv. 4, 6). (John D. Barry et al., Faithlife Study Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016), Nu 30:2.)

 

The making of vows and oaths is serious business and is never to be taken lightly by us. In fact, it behooves us as we examine the binding potential of vows and oaths to always be careful to guard that which comes out of our mouths as commitments.

 

 

The Expectations for the Vows – Oaths – Obligations That Women Make

 

However, Yehovah delineated the following exceptions for women.

 

Any female living in her father’s house (the LXX stipulates this applies to a female in her youth) who makes a vow that her father hears about, but he says nothing to her about it, her vow or oath will stand. However, if her father hears about it but disagrees with the vows or oaths she’s made, he may invalidate them, and she will not bear any responsibility for it. “Any vow and any sworn oath or a pledge to inflict on herself, her husband can confirm it or her husband can nullify it. But if her husband is completely silent from day to day, then he confirms all her vows or all her pledges that are on her; he confirms them because he was silent to her on the day he heard them. But if he indeed nullifies them after he hears them (i.e. days after hearing them), then he will bear her guilt” (30:13-15 LEB).

 

The same principle applies today, whereby children cannot enter nor be bound to contractual agreements for obvious reasons. They are young and they are often unaware of the consequences of their life decisions. We have total responsibility for our children until the day they are emancipated or get married. Yah has given them to us to oversee.

 

The same provision applies to a married woman as applies to a young female living in her father’s house. A married woman who has made a vow that her husband disagrees with has the authority to nullify such vows. Why is this so? Yah placed the man ahead of the woman in terms of the family unit. He makes the decisions for the home. It is the order that Yehovah established for the family unit. Any vows or oaths that his wife makes will have a direct effect on the family, and since the husband is responsible for the wellbeing of his family, he must ensure that his wife hasn’t involved herself into something that will adversely affect the shalom of the home.

 

Vows, oaths, and obligations made by a widow or a divorced woman will remain valid as they would for a man.

 

The provision in Torah, whereby husbands and fathers may annul their wives’ and daughters’ vows, oaths, and obligations, respectively, protected the women in a man’s life from the legal ramifications of commitments that they may have made in error or because of naivete. This provision also aims to protect the integrity and security of the family.

 

Why were special, restricting provisions made by Yah regarding women making vows and oaths? Females who were married or underaged living in her parents’ home lived under the authority of their husband and father, respectively. However, any husband or father that nullifies their woman’s vow or oath is subject to the consequences that may come from his nullification.

 

Let us not forget that in ancient times, and to a greater and lesser extent today, the wife in a family cares after her husband and raising the family’s children. Daughters focus on becoming good wives and partners to their future husbands. If a wife or underaged daughter get caught-up in an obligation, she is incapable of fulfilling; she risks bringing financial harm to the family or being enslaved for failure to meet the terms of her obligation.

 

Widows and divorced women followed the same standards as men, as they didn’t have any domestic male authority governing their lives.

 

 

Biblically Defining Vows and Oaths and Obligations

 

Oaths (aka shevu’ah) are formal, binding promises we make to another individual or entity, such as Yehovah. Oaths then are a fulfilling of a sacred duty or responsibility without a condition precipitating the oath. We can find an example of an oath in the Psalms.

 

132 O יהוה, remember Dawiḏ,

All his afflictions;

2How he swore to יהוה,

Vowed to the Mighty One of Ya‛aqoḇ:

3“Not to enter into my dwelling-house,

Not to get into my bed,

4“Not to give sleep to my eyes,

Or slumber to my eyelids,

5“Until I find a place for יהוה,

A dwelling place for the Mighty One of Ya‛aqoḇ.” (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Ps 132.)

 

Vows (aka neder) are expressions of devotion or piety that we make towards Yehovah, such as offerings, pledges of abstinence (e.g. Nazarite Vow), and other forms of spiritual or physical actions (e.g. praying, committing to serve the Body, etc.). We pledge to do something in response to something the other party (namely Yehovah) promises to do for us. Vows that involve financial commitments would be a direct concern for the head of household, since more times than not, he was the bread-winner for the family. Unfortunately, because we may get caught-up in our piety and zeal towards Yah from time-to-time, we may make vows in haste and later on find that we’ve over-committed ourselves or simply forget to fulfill the vow.

 

Often, vows involve our dedicating something or someone to the service of the sanctuary, as in the case Abshalom (ref. 2 Sam 15.7-8), Hannah and Elkanah (ref. 1 Sam 1:19-27), and in the case of those who took on the Nazarite vow (Num 6:2-21).

 

 

Our reading also addresses general contractual and dedicatory commitments or obligations (aka ‘issar/’esar) which is any binding agreement that is executed in writing or by official proclamation.

 

When Yah delivers an edict, for instance, we must carry out and obey that edict, such as fulfilling our obligation to present the firstfruits of our increase on its appointed day (Num 18:12-13) and presenting our tithes unto Yehovah (Lev 27:30-33). When Yah prohibited us from taking the spoils of war and devoting to destruction, the inhabitants of the various nations and cities Yah directed us to war against. Then there are financial, contractual obligations that we enter into that we are required to fulfill.

 

We must mention that certain vows, oaths, and obligations overlap from time to time. That to break any of these commitments is tantamount to profaning Yehovah. Why? It is tantamount to profaning Yehovah because He is a direct witness to the vows, oaths, and obligations we attach ourselves to.

 

Recall that our reading addressed exemptions or reversals to the vows, oaths, and obligation rules, which applied only to those commitments that a father or husband overrules. But were you aware that the Rabbis took it upon themselves to provide an escape from obligations that we commit ourselves to by assuming religious authority to nullify certain vows, oaths, and obligations? When petitioned to do so, these treaded lightly, knowing that they really had no wiggle room to nullify vows, oaths, and commitments. Thus, these took advantage of word-plays to circumvent the validity of certain commitments, which, of course, violated Yah’s prohibition against adding to and subtracting from His Torah commands (Deu 4:2; 12:32; e.g. m. Nedarim 1.1-3).

 

Master Yahoshua pushed back on this profane practice of the Rabbis when He directly addressed this issue of making vows and oaths and obligations in His Sermon on the Mount, which also is our apostolic reading for this week:

 

33“Again, you heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to יהוה.’ Way. 19:12; Bem. 30:2; Deḇ. 23:21

34“But I say to you, do not swear [vainly] at all, neither by the heaven, because it is Elohim’s throne;

35nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; Yesh. 66:1 nor by Yerushalayim, for it is the city of the great Sovereign; Teh. 48:2

36nor swear by your head, because you are not able to make one hair white or black.

37“But let your word ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No’ be ‘No.’ And what goes beyond these is from the wicked one. (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Mt 5:33–37.)

 

Here we see the Master’s corrective instructions are quite simple: Avoid making commitments we know we are incapable or have no intention of keeping. Rather, ensure that our yeses are yes, and our no’s be no.

 

 

(31:1-12) — We War Against the Midianites

 

Yah left instructions with Moshe that we were to seek vengeance against the Midianites just before he dies. Men were to assemble themselves before Yehovah, arrayed for battle, to execute vengeance from Yehovah against Midian. We were to muster 1,000 men from each tribe to go up against Midian, totaling 12,000 soldiers. Phinehas the Priest, upon whom Yah conferred His covenant of peace, led us into battle along with the holy elements of the sanctuary. Shofars were used to communicate our maneuvers against Midian (LXX).

 

(31:13-24) — The Outcome of our War with Midian

 

We killed every Midian male, along with their leaders and princes. Balaam of Peor we also killed. (I guess Balaam either did not make it back to Peor or he had returned to Moab by that time.) No Israelite warrior died in the battle (31:49).

 

We took captive the Midianite women along with their children and took unto ourselves all their domesticated animals and articles of wealth. We burned all their cities and encampments. We brought all that we’d taken from the Midianites and presented them before Moshe and Eleazar the Cohen Gadol just outside our encampment on the desert-plateau of Moab at Araboth.

 

Moshe was outraged that we had taken captive the Midianite women. He reminded us it was these women who were instrumental in our apostacy with Ba’al of Peor. (Reference Num 25:1-9) We learned that Balaam of Beor was the mastermind behind the plan to lead us into apostacy with Ba’al of Peor. That apostacy resulted in the deaths of 24,000 souls.

 

Thus, Moshe instructed us to execute every woman who has ever engaged in a sexual relationship with a man. Those women who had not engaged in a sexual relationship with men, we were to spare them and we could take them as wives.

 

Because we had become ritually defiled in our war against Moab, we were required to remain outside the encampment for 7-days and undergo the purification ritual along with the captives and the confiscated booty. (Reference Num 19:11-22) We must return to a state of ritual purity and anything that we brought into the camp had to be purified according to the Yah’s Torah.

 

(31:25-54) — Divi’ing Up the Spoils of War

 

In obedience to Yehovah’s instructions, we took inventory of all that we took possession of in our war against the Midianites and divided those items between those of us who fought and the rest of our community. From the spoils of war we provided Tribute (Me-kes, meaning a tax on spoil to be rendered unto Yehovah; religious dues or taxes in support of the priestly servants of Yehovah) to Yehovah through our High Priest Eleazar. (Yah must always receive first portion of our increase.) Still, quite a bit of the war-booty remained after we gave Tribute of it to Yah and our warriors received their portions. That which remained included thousands of sheep, heads of cattle, donkeys, and virgin females.

 

Still yet, our warriors rendered unto Yehovah all the valuables they’d collected as booty from the Midianites a memorial and to make atonement for them before Yehovah (31:50). Our hearts, for once, were in the right place. Yah came first in our hearts, minds, and souls. We were ready to go in and receive the Land.

 

Yah instructed us to eradicate the men, male children, and sexually active women of the Midianite confederacy. Let us not forget that it was Balak, through the instigation of Balaam, used the Midianite women to seduce our men into apostacy. These women brought a curse upon us that resulted in 24,000 members of our nation perishing. His retribution against the Midianite confederacy through our warriors was a fulfillment of His promise to Avraham that He would curse those that curse him, and by extension, his seed (Gen 12 and 27). Yah has always been clear that vengeance is His to be had (Isa 63:4; Rom 12:19), and Yah does not forget.

 

You may agree that one of the biggest complaints the uninitiated members of society and the Christian religion have against Yehovah is that He is a mean, vengeful, hateful, always-angry, unforgiving God. Some go as far as saying that they want nothing to do with such a God and that they much prefer to deal with the loving God who they identify as Jesus Christ.

 

 

But these individuals are sorely lacking in their understanding of the wholeness of Yah’s sovereignty, His holiness, and His righteousness. You see, Yehovah doesn’t operate on the same scale and with the same convictions and mindset that many of us do.

 

Of Himself, through the Prophet Isaiah, Yah stated:

 

6Seek יהוה while He is to be found, call on Him while He is near.

7Let the wrong forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts. Let him return to יהוה, who has compassion on him, and to our Elohim, for He pardons much.

8“For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways,” declares יהוה.

9“For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts. (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Is 55:6–9.)

 

We try to hold Yah to our personal standards and sense of righteousness. But we must not overlook the fact that “we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousness are as filthy rags” (Isa 64.6; KJV). For our Elohim is irresistibly holy and righteous beyond compare. Thus, because of his unrestricted sovereignty and holiness and righteousness, He deals with people and nations under these immutable character traits.

 

Indeed, there are certain sins and transgression of the creative order (such as the defilement of all flesh that took place when the Watchers descended to earth and disrupted Yah’s creative order) that prompt Yah to act in ways that may offend our delicate western sensibilities. But our sensibilities and our opinions don’t amount to a hill of beans when it comes to Yah exercising His sovereign will and purpose.

 

 

The purification that our warriors underwent before being permitted back into the encampment was demonstrative of Yah’s character. Our God is a God of life and holiness. He does not take pleasure in the deaths of any human soul. However, to propagate His pro-life agenda, He occasionally spills blood in accordance with His divine will and purpose. And in order for Him to dwell in our midst, we must be in a state of ritual purity. Death, the precipitate of sin, is impure. Any contact that we have with human remains requires that we be purified in order to dwell in His midst and be of service to Him.

 

 

If you have not established and are not walking in a true and substantive covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe through Yeshua Messiah, I invite you to do so today, for today is the day of salvation. Simply turn to Yah, repent of the sins of life, and ask Him to forgive you of those sins. Then seek Abba Yah for opportunities for you to be water-immersed (aka baptized) and receive Yah’s indwelling, Set-apart Spirit. Become a disciple of Yeshua and begin walking in His and His Father’s ways. Seek out opportunities for fellowship with likeminded believers and engage yourself in growing and learning how to walk this narrow path that leads to the Kingdom and to salvation.

 

Please, don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need guidance in the True Faith once delivered. (perceptionwp@gmail.com) But don’t let another day go by without acting on you convictions. The time for coming to faith in this dispensation is coming to a close and you need to be on the right side of life that only Yeshua can provide.

 

It is my heartfelt hope, trust, and prayer that you have a blessed day of rest in Yeshua Messiah.

 

Faithfully,

 

Rod

 

Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works or Keeping Torah in Favor of Faith? Part 2 of The New Testament Validates the Necessity of Torah Living for God’s People Series

by | Mar 18, 2022 |

This is “Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works in Favor of Faith?” This will be part 2 of our Paul Officially Validates Torah Living for God’s People series.   Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 4:1-8. But we will pay...

read more

Biblical Rosh Hashanah 2022 Update

by | Mar 3, 2022 |

Starting off, I would be remiss if I did not connect this update with my last post entitled "Why I Keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar and not the Other Popular Messianic Calendars." In that post, I gave five reasons why I keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar....

read more

Learning to Fear God and Receive His Peace — Israel’s Inextricable Link to Our Salvation Part 4

by | Feb 9, 2024 | Blog, Podcasts

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

After Paul’s conversion to the Way Faith, the Nazarene assemblies that were strewn throughout the Judean region, including the Galilee and Samaria, enjoyed a season of relative peace and unity. (Act 9:31) Those coming into the Way Movement, a movement that many scholars believe the orthodox Jewish communities in the region treated as simply another Jewish sect (like the Pharisees, Sadducees, the Essenes), were being instructed in (1) the fear of Yehovah (i.e. learning to fear Yehovah through witnessing the movement of the Holy Spirit and by walking in Yeshua-centric Torah) and (2) the comfort of the Holy Spirit (aka the Ruach Kodesh). The King James Version describes members of the Nazarene or Way Movement operating within the broader Jewish Community as “walking” in the fear of Yehovah and in the “comfort” of the Holy Spirit. The Faith at that time was experiencing tremendous growth. It was truly a wonderful time to be a part of such a great move of the Holy Spirit, under the leadership of the Apostles. (Eph 2:20) In so many ways, the Kingdom of God (aka the Malchut Elohim) had once again intervened in the affairs of man and had established itself amid a set-apart people who were truly living the life abundant. (Joh 10:10)

 

Andrew Gabriel Roth’s commentary on this verse (i.e. Acts 9:31) points out an interesting contrast in what the Netsarim (aka the Jerusalem Messianics) were experiencing during this quiet but spiritually dynamic period in our Faith’s history: When the redeemed of Messiah fear Abba Yah they receive comfort. (Aramaic English New Testament) As Roth sees it, these extreme opposite emotional states are really one of cause and effect: fear God and receive God’s peace.

 

This historic situation established a Netsari/Messianic character trait that every subsequent generation of Yeshua disciples must adopt if they are going to be successful in their quest for the Kingdom of God/the Malchut Elohim. That essential character trait is having a true fear of Yehovah Elohim.

 

God Fearers

 

Those that truly “fear YHVH” such that they are obedient only to His voice and His ways — such that these take to heart the fundamental maxim that the whole duty of man is to fear Yah and keep His commandments (Ecc 12:13) — possess the Father’s Set-Apart Spirit (aka the Ruach Kodesh/Holy Spirit). The Spirit that operates in them creates in them an “I want to obey heart” (to borrow a phrase frequently used by Torah Teacher Gary Steven Simons of Triumph in Truth Ministries). And this is what the first-century Jerusalem brethren described in Acts 9 were doing: They were fearing Yehovah and living a Yeshua-centric Torah lifestyle. Because of this unique, Kingdom-driven way of life, these believers received God’s peace (aka the Shalom of Yehovah).

 

The Shalom of Yehovah

 

We frequently use the Hebrew term shalom when greeting and bidding goodbyes to one another. When our assembly leaders recite and confer Yehovah’s blessing upon God’s people with the Aaronic Blessing, there is an expectation by Yah’s people that Abba Yah will always have His face turned towards them and bestow His shalom upon them. (Num 6:26) I go into some detail about the Aaronic Blessing in my teaching entitled “The Deep Abiding Mysteries of the Aaronic Blessing.” (I will place the link to that discussion in this teaching’s transcript for your convenience.) But the shalom that flows from an obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah is not just about one having freedom from disturbances, but more so, it’s about one being whole in every aspect of their being.

 

Shaul (aka the Apostle Paul) describes this form of peace as a mystery (i.e. it surpasses human understanding). Yehovah’s shalom guards the Child of Yah’s heart and mind. (Phi 4:7) So, what is Yah’s shalom guarding the Child of Yah’s heart and mind from? It’s guarding their heart and mind against the wiles, slings, and arrows of the enemy (i.e. the enemy’s tactics, deception, and ploys). And don’t you know, beloved, that the enemy’s attacks are not always against our bodies, relationships, and material possessions? The enemy’s attacks are more times than not against our hearts and minds. (Eph 6:10-12, 15) And so, as the apostle wrote to his Philippian readers, it behooves them to receive Abba Yah’s shalom. It was, and remains even today, the only defensive weapon against the enemy’s attacks against their hearts and minds.

 

And if there is anything that we, as a people of the Malchut Elohim, need during these perilous times, both collectively and individually, is the Shalom of Yehovah.

 

Roth describes those first-century members of the Way Movement in Jerusalem as having found “peace and contentment of being.” (AENT; p. 331) And this biblical principle of Yehovah-fearers/God fearers possessing a peace that surpasses all understanding is just as applicable today as it was back then.

 

Sadly beloved, there is a drought of true God-fearers in this world, especially today. I’ll get into some reasons this is so later on in this teaching. But one of the main reasons the world today experiences a drought of true God-fearers is because of biblical illiteracy and the conditioning of believers to not fear the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

 

Biblically Defining What it Means to Fear God

 

What does it mean to fear YHVH?

 

The traditional (let’s say Christian) teaching holds that to fear God is to revere or reverence Him; to adore Him; to be loyal and faithful to Him; to trust Him; and to obey the tenets of whatever church one is a member of. Some would call this being religious or being a person of faith.

 

Most teachers reject the idea that to fear God is to possess concern or dread towards God, or to be terrified of Yah. But to a lesser or greater extent, this is what true biblical fear of God looks like.

 

When we talk about fearing Elohim, we’re not talking so much about being terrified or frightened of Yah such that we run away and hide from Him because we fear for our lives. Indeed, Yehovah does not want that type of relationship for His chosen ones.

 

Abba Yah did not intend for us to pull away in terror of Him at the display of His irresistible power on the day that He revealed Himself to us on Mount Sinai and spoke to us His ten-commandments. But as Moshe explained, it was Abba Yah’s intent “that His fear may be in you, so that you do not sin. (Messianic Jewish Family Bible Society, Holy Scriptures: Tree of Life Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2015), Ex 20:20.) Yah wanted there to be implanted into our psyche such a mind of, what I will call here, fearful respect of Him that we would not transgress His Torah.

 

What Abba wants from His chosen ones is obedience, trust, love, and a substantive intimate relationship such that they are quite aware of Who He is and the great things that He can and will do for us if we remain true to Him, and what will happen to us when we cross and transgress Him and His ways.

 

Yes, Abba Yah wants His chosen ones to revere, be loyal, impressed by, faithful towards Him, and the like. But He wants us to truly fear Him because there is great benefit to be had by us when we have trepidation, apprehension, an uneasiness, and disquietude toward Him.

 

The Psalmist wrote that “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: A good understanding have all they that do His commandments: His praise endureth forever” (111:10; KJV; cf. Pro 1:7; 9:10).

 

We desperately need a measure of Godly wisdom in order to make it into the Kingdom. Our Master Yeshua came to impart His Father’s wisdom to us in a way that only He, as the Son of Yehovah, could deliver. That’s why it is imperative that we develop an intense hunger and thirst for Him and His Father’s righteousness such that we grow in Godly wisdom.

 

I believe when we turn a blind eye to what it truly means to fear Elohim, such as having trepidation, apprehension, an uneasiness, or disquietude toward Him, and we substitute the biblical meaning of “the fear of God” with milk-toast terms such as awe, reverence, loyalty, and the like, we leave open the door to making God into whatever image or likeness that we want Him to be.

 

Consider the practices of some of our Denominationalist brethren who place the entirety of their eternal security upon their warped understanding of “grace.” Their perverted grace doctrine has conditioned many of them to not fear Yehovah, as scripture teaches. To these, grace covers every fault they had in the past, that they have in the present, and that they will have in the future. Therefore, they erroneously rationalize that there’s no need to truly fear the Holy Creator of the Universe. And because there’s no need to truly fear the Holy Creator of the Universe, there is no need to obey His instructions in righteousness nor walk in our Master Yeshua’s footsteps. All one need do is to possess a cognitive understanding (i.e. believe) that Jesus died for his/her sins and ask Him to take up residence in their heart. To these, Yah has no expectation whatsoever of them. They’ve arrived and nothing Yehovah or Yeshua may say contrary to their erroneous beliefs will change the fact that they are guaranteed eternal life and a place in the Kingdom.

 

 Again, for the nominal Christian, there is no need to fear Yehovah. Sadly, this rejection of Biblically fearing Yehovah, I believe, has led to the gulf that exists between our Faith Community and Denominational Christianity. When we came into this beloved faith of ours and the scales of spiritual blindness fell from our eyes and the deafness of truly hearing Yah’s voice in our lives was unstopped in our ears, we gained an immediate fear of Yehovah. If you were like me, upon learning that we’d inherited lies, we feared the consequences of what our years of ignorant disobedience and rebelliousness would bring us if we didn’t straighten up and fly right. Our hearts were broken at the thought that we’d let our beloved Creator down because of our previous life of disobedience and rebelliousness. And it was that fear of Elohim that was finally ignited within us that led to us truly taking up our execution stake and following Yahoshua HaMashiyach for the rest of our lives (Mat 16:24; Mar 8:34; 10:21; Luk 9:23). We received, through Yah’s indwelling, Set-Apart Spirit, an “I want to obey” heart, mind, and soul. And we became fearfully sin-conscious, constantly searching for — asking Yehovah to reveal to us — those sinful elements in our lives that “doth so easily beset us” (Heb 12:1). Our greatest fear is that we will disappoint Yehovah and damage our loving, covenant relationship with Him because of some unreconciled sin. We always want to make things right with our God. So yes, we develop an perpetual, genuine fear of Yehovah.

 

True Biblical fear of Elohim affords those that would be His to come into His presence unimpeded (i.e. unimpeded by unreconciled sin) and commune with Him. The one who truly fears Yehovah knows that Abba Yah can see right through them as He is a discerner of the heart, the thoughts and intents of the human soul (Heb 4:12). Thus, he/she is careful when they come into Yah’s presence that they not be found by Him to be in an unclean state (i.e. an impure heart, mind, and body). We cringe at the thought that we may have crossed Him, disappointed Him, or worse, offended Him and transgressed His Torah. We take nothing for granted when it comes to our covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe. So we go the extra-mile by seeking His forgiveness for unreconciled sin and petitioning that we once again be permitted to enter His divine presence. We petition Him to reveal to us those things in our being that displease Him and we ask His help to overcome those obstacles to our relationship with Him.

 

 

Yah’s greatness causes those that come into His presence to not just respect and revere Him, but to tremble at His presence (Exo 14:30-31; Deu 7:21; Psa 99:3).

 

We fear certain things that if not handled properly by us, may result in our harm: Fire, electricity, water/flood, structural integrity of our homes, the integrity of our relationships, the government, nature, and so forth. The fear of such things typically don’t cause us to avoid them outright because we know there is great benefit to be had if we are obedient to their proper use; that is, if we possess a healthy fear of them.

 

If we were children who were raised by moral and loving parents, we learned to fear them. Yes, we may have revered them, but we also feared them. We feared the consequences of what might happen to us if we crossed them or transgressed their house rules.

 

Those of us who are married and we love our spouses are careful to not cause upset to our relationship (e.g. do something that our spouse won’t approve of or will be injured by such as our cheating on them and so forth). We fear the consequences of what may happen if we wrong our spouses and transgress Yah’s Torah.

 

These same principles apply to our relationship with Yehovah. It’s one thing to reverence, respect, and adore Yehovah which we are compelled to do anyway. But we enter an entirely different level of relationship with Yah when we truly fear Him as He demands of us to do.

 

We are called to be “God-fearers,” not in the classic, orthodox Jewish sense that the title once served as a bone to Gentiles who simply wanted to serve and worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob but were led to take a pass on becoming a religious Jew. But a God-fearer from God’s perspective. Where we wake-up every morning and with firm resolve “work out our own salvation with fear and trembling” (Phi 2:12; 2 Cor 2:3). Where we serve Yehovah with fear and rejoice with trembling because we know Who He truly is: that He is sovereign and all powerful (Psa 2:11). We start to learn that we are not to fear people that can only kill our physical bodies, but we fear the Creator of the Universe that can completely destroy all traces of our being in the Lake of Fire (Mat 10:28; Heb 13:6). We tremble and fear Yehovah because we know the mighty and awesome work He has done in our lives and in the lives of His set apart people throughout the ages. As disciples of Yeshua Messiah, we recognize that our whole duty is to fear Yehovah and keep His commandments, and His commandments are our Master’s commandments (Deu 8:6; Ecc 12:13; Joh 14:15). We know that when we fear our Elohim, He will deliver us from our enemies (2 Kin 17:39). In fact, our fear of Yehovah becomes our confidence (Job 4:6).

 

We humans transgress our Creator’s ways and instructions when we lose (although most of us never had it in the first place) any and all fear of Yehovah. And how do we lose fear of Yehovah? We lose our fear of Yehovah when we stop believing Him and we instead start believing people over Yah. Genuine faith and belief in Yehovah and in His Son Yeshua induce genuine fear of Yehovah. When we believe Yehovah is Who He says He is and that He will do what He says He will do, then we are compelled to fear Him. It’s just that simple.

 

_____________________________________________

Cornelius — The God-Fearer

 

Luke records Cornelius being the first “named” Gentile converted to the Netsarim (aka Nazarene) Faith. He is described as being a Caesarean native and a captain of a Roman army regiment. Spiritually, he was righteous, and he feared God, along with his entire household (Act 10:2). Cornelius “beseeched” or earnestly prayed to Yehovah throughout each day of his life. (Some have suggested that he was actually reciting Jewish liturgies as part of his daily routine.) Furthermore, Cornelius rendered many alms before the people (that is, he was a cheerful giver (2 Cor 9:7) to the local synagogue he attended and to the poor of his community). Indeed, given this character sketch, it is likely that Cornelius not only feared Yehovah in his person, but was a qualified “God-fearer” according to orthodox Jewish custom.

 

Many of us focus on the religious classification that the title “God-fearer” places on this man and his household, which I will not attempt to marginalize here. I do think that him being a God-fearer in the eyes of orthodox Judaism, that is a Gentile who takes up Judaism as a way of life but who chooses not to convert to Judaism (aka become proselytized which leads to physical circumcision and total conformity to the Jewish religion) for whatever reason, is a relevant factor in the storyline. But let us not be fooled into understanding the realities of the title God-fearer that Rabbinic Jews conferred upon certain classes of Gentiles. It was a porous barrier that permitted certain well-to-do Gentiles to take part in restricted worship of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob while maintaining “the middle wall of partition” between Jew and Gentile. The Apostle Paul (aka Shaul) recognized that Yehovah never intended for Gentiles to be excluded from worshiping and walking out a life of Torah. Yehovah used the Person and ministry of Yeshua, Israel’s Messiah, to break down the middle wall of partition that separated the Jew from the Gentile believer, bringing them together as one man. (Eph 2:14)

 

 

Denominationalists have feloniously failed to understand the meaning of the vision that led Peter (aka Kefa) to Cornelius’ home and to Cornelius and his family coming into a covenant relationship with Yehovah through Yeshua Messiah. The true meaning of the vision of the sheet knitted at its four corners holding several unclean animals descending to the apostle with a voice instructing Kefa to “rise, kill, and eat” has been feloniously misinterpreted by denominationalists for centuries, despite Kefa himself declaring the vision’s true meaning to any who has eyes to see and ears to hear. The denominationalists, as most of you know, have used Kefa’s vision of the sheet holding unclean animals to promote their anti-Torah agenda, this time focusing on Yehovah’s dietary Torah. (Lev 11:1-47; Deu 14:3-21) The truth of the matter is that Kefa’s vision was not about the free consumption of meat by God’s people, be those creatures clean or unclean. The Holy Spirit revealed to Kefa the true meaning of the vision:

 

(25) And it came to be that when Kefa entered, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and bowed before him. (26) But Kefa raised him up, saying, “Stand up, I myself am also a man.” (27) And talking with him, he went in and found many who had come together. (28) And he said to them, “You know that a Yehudi (aka a Jewish) man is not allowed to associate with, or go to one of another race. But Elohim has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean. (29) That is why I came without hesitation when I was sent for…(34) Truly I see that Elohim shows no partiality, (35) but in every nation, he who FEARS HIM AND WORKS RIGHTEOUSNESS IS ACCEPTED BY HIM.” (Act 10; The Scriptures ISR).

 

And of course, as the story goes, Kefa delivers unto Cornelius and his household the unadulterated Gospel message. Amid Kefa’s sermon, “the Set-apart Spirit fell upon all those hearing the world. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Kefa, because the gift of the Set-apart Spirit had been poured out on the nations also for they were hearing them speaking with tongues and extolling Elohim” (Act 10:45-46; The Scriptures ISR).

 

This historic event was followed up by Cornelius and his household being water-immersed by Kefa and his evangelistic team. (Act 10:48)

 

Let us not fall for Denominationalists’ false narrative that Cornelius and all non-Jews that followed him into the Nazarene Faith began living a lawless/Torahless life upon their conversion. Let us not overlook the reality that before Cornelius and his household officially transitioned to the Nazarene Faith, they feared God, which means they walked in Yehovah’s ways to the best of their knowledge and ability. They kept Torah to the best of their knowledge and ability. And although the Gospel record of Luke is silent on Cornelius’ life after his conversion, history bears out non-Jewish converts to the Way worshiped the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and walked in His ways right alongside their Messianic Jewish brethren in their local synagogue and in fellow-believers’ homes. (Act 2:42, 46)

 

This is a primer for our upcoming discussion on the Jerusalem Council’s Edict and its bearing on our salvation and inextricable link to Israel.

 

It is my hope, trust, and prayer, beloved, that we all learn to fear Yehovah in such a way that we walk blameless before our Elohim and receive His shalom over our lives.

Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works or Keeping Torah in Favor of Faith? Part 2 of The New Testament Validates the Necessity of Torah Living for God’s People Series

by | Mar 18, 2022 |

This is “Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works in Favor of Faith?” This will be part 2 of our Paul Officially Validates Torah Living for God’s People series.   Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 4:1-8. But we will pay...

read more

Biblical Rosh Hashanah 2022 Update

by | Mar 3, 2022 |

Starting off, I would be remiss if I did not connect this update with my last post entitled "Why I Keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar and not the Other Popular Messianic Calendars." In that post, I gave five reasons why I keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar....

read more

The Call For God’s People to be Jealous with His Jealousy — Thoughts and Reflections on Torah Reading 118

by | Feb 2, 2024 | Blog, Podcasts

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

 

And greetings elect of the Most High. Welcome back to the Messianic Torah Observer. I’m Rod Thomas, coming to you on Preparation Day, the 21st day of the 11th month of Yah’s biblical calendar year. That translates into 2/2/2024 on the pagan Roman Calendar.

 

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedules to fellowship with me as we prepare to enter Yah’s Sabbath. And as always, beloved, it is my hope, trust, and prayer that this installment of TMTO finds you, your families, and your fellowships well and blessed.

 

This is “The Call For God’s People to be Jealous with His Jealousy.” This will be my thoughts and reflections on the 118th Reading in our 3-year Torah Reading cycle.”

_________________________________________

 

As has been my custom for the past year or so, I posted my thoughts and reflections on Torah Reading 117 in written format on themessianictorahobserver.org. 

 

As it turns out, this week’s Reading is a direct carryover from last week’s Reading. That reading included the story of Phinehas, son of Eleazar the High Priest at that time, executing a couple he witnessed engaged in the heinous and abominable act of Ba’al of Peor worship. (We’ll get a little into what Ba’al of Peor worship involved in just a moment.)

 

Yehovah, our Elohim, reacted favorably to Phinehas’ righteous act, describing Phinehas as being “jealous with His jealousy.” (We will talk about what that means.)

 

As a reward, Yehovah conferred upon Phinehas and his seed His “Covenant of Peace,” which we will also discuss a little later in this post.

 

 

Before we can discuss Yehovah’s reaction to and actions toward Phinehas, I want to return to last week’s Reading (i.e. 117) and look at Phinehas’ actions from a couple of perspectives. This will help establish some context for our discussion this week as well as possibly answer some questions that may crop in your mind as it relates to the story’s details.

 

I will read the last four verses of last week’s reading, which should set the table for our discussion today.

 

 

6 And behold, one of the people of Israel came and brought a Midianite woman to his family (i.e. Zimri, the Ba’al of Peor worshiping Israelite), in the sight of Moses and in the sight of the whole congregation of the people of Israel, while they were weeping in the entrance of the tent of meeting. 7 When Phinehas the son of Eleazar, son of Aaron the priest, saw it, he rose and left the congregation and took a spear in his hand 8 and went after the man of Israel into the chamber and pierced both of them, the man of Israel and the woman through her belly (their names being later given in our text today as Zimri and Kosbi). Thus, the plague on the people of Israel was stopped. 9 Nevertheless, those who died by the plague were twenty-four thousand. (The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Nu 25:6–9.)

 

What is the background to this tragic event?

 

As mentioned in Reading 117, while we were encamped in Shittim, along the border of Moab, we had devolved as a people into unimaginable apostacy. Specifically, we had given ourselves over to Ba’al of Peor worship.

 

This form of Ba’al worship was especially heinous and offensive. Without getting too graphic, it incorporated open sex acts as a feature of worship. Recall in 25:1 that besides our rendering sacrifices and bowing down to Ba’al, we began to “whore with the daughters of Moab.” (ESV)

 

So, our apostacy wasn’t only about us committing fornication and adultery with the woman of Moab; it was more about us engaging in adultery and fornication as part of our worship of Ba’al of Peor. Moshe described us as having “yoked” ourselves to Ba’al of Peor.

 

Now, the Septuagint offers a slightly different optic and logistic to this story that differs slightly from the way the ESV and other Masoretic-based texts render this story. These two differences add a little more texture to the story that I believe we need to consider before going further into our study.

 

6 And behold, a man of the sons of Israel (i.e. a native-born Israeli) went and brought his brother (aka “adelphos” or a son of the same mother) to a Midianite woman in front of Moses and before the entire congregation of the sons of Israel, and they were weeping at the entrance of the tent of testimony. 7 And seeing this, Phinehas son of Eleazar, son of Aaron, the priest, rose up out of the midst of the congregation and took a barbed lance in his hand. 8 He went in after the Israelite man into the furnace (i.e. “kaminos” or kiln for smelting, baking, burning earthenware and bricks) and pierced both of them, both the Israelite man and the woman, through her womb. Then the plague was ceased from the sons of Israel. 9 Now those who died in the plague were twenty-four thousand. (Rick Brannan, Ken M. Penner et al., The Lexham English Septuagint, Second Edition. (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020), Nu 25:6–9.)

 

So, the Septuagint records that an (unnamed) Israeli man brought his brother to a Midianite woman in clear view of Moshe and the entire congregation of Yisrael. Remember, as this incident is playing out, because of our apostacy, Yah’s wrath manifested throughout our encampment as a deadly plague (25:8). As a result, Moshe and the congregation of Yisra’el (presumably those who had not yoked themselves to Ba’al of Peor worship) had assembled at the entrance of the Tent of Testimony to weep and petition Yehovah for mercy. (25:6) The text described Yah as being “incensed with wrath” against us.

 

The JPS rendering, a Masoretic-based text, describes the situation where “one of the Israelites came and brought a Midianite woman over to his companions, in the sight of Moses and of the whole Israelite community who were weeping at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.” (Michael Carasik, ed., Numbers: NJPS English Translation, trans. Michael Carasik, First edition., The Commentators’ Bible (Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 2011), Nu 25:6.)

 

This nuance to the storyline suggests that there was at least one member of our congregation (possibly more, we don’t know) that was actively promoting Ba’al of Peor sex-worship to us. This individual ends up pairing Zimri with this Midianite prostitute whose name we later learn is Kosbi. In other words, this unnamed man was acting in the capacity of a “pimp” and he was engaging in such heinous and disgusting activity amid a raging, deadly plague and in plain view of Moshe and the righteous remnant of Yisra’el. This shows that there are no limits to the wicked intent of the human heart, such that, even amid Yah’s wrath, man will pursue evil. (Can you imagine what the Great Tribulation is going to be like?) Yehovah describes the human heart as being “desperately wicked.” (Jer 17:9)

 

The second nuance I need to point out to you is that the Septuagint rendering records that outraged and impassioned Phinehas (Son of Eleazar the High Priest at this time) followed the couple “into the furnace” and ran them both through with a “barbed lance” (i.e. a spear or javelin).

 

Interestingly, the JPS records Phinehas followed the couple “into the chamber and stabbed both of them, the Israelite and the woman, through the belly.” (Michael Carasik, ed., Numbers: NJPS English Translation, trans. Michael Carasik, First edition., The Commentators’ Bible (Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 2011), Nu 25:8.)

 

I don’t know about you, but the various teachings I’ve listened to in this story have always led me to believe that Phinehas executed this couple inside Zimri’s personal tent or dwelling. However, these two texts make me question this thinking. We know the assembled congregation at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting saw this couple go into a “chamber” (JPS which J. H. Hertz in his Torah-Haftarah defines as “the inner division of the large vaulted tents that were used as the apartment of the women,” pg. 679) and or a place that housed a “furnace” (LXX); possibly a tent that members of our congregation erected for the expressed purpose of Ba’al of Peor worship that may have also housed an altar of some sort by which worshipers would render sacrifices unto Ba’al of Peor in conjunction with their abominable sex acts. Regardless, this is the place that Phinehas does them both in and it doesn’t appear to be Zimri’s personal dwelling.

 

In his “Studies in the Torah — Numbers,” Tim Hegg puts forth the theory Zimri (or a fellow Israeli) accompanies Cozbi (the Midianite sex-cult prostitute) into the Tent of Meeting to engage in their abominable act of Ba’al of Peor worship. (p. 176) Mr. Hegg supports this theory by citing that this event took place “in the sight of Moses and all Israel, who were weeping at the doorway of the Tent of Meeting” … and “that Phinehas went into the tent when he struck them through.” He further writes they (i.e. the couple) were engaging in this fertility ritual within the Holy Place and the sin of Ba’al Peor had entered into the very Sanctuary of HaShem.” (pg. 176)

 

Hegg further supports his theory by mentioning a little background information on Torah’s stance on capital punishment. He supports his theory by citing that our congregation cannot administer capital punishment without first having the alleged criminal face a court of judges who would render a capital punishment verdict based upon the testimony of two or three witnesses. Once the court renders a guilty verdict, it falls to the witnesses to cast the first stones in that individual’s public execution. (Deu 17:6-11)

We see, however, in the case of Zimri and Kosbi, that Phinehas did not adhere to this judicial process. Instead, Phinehas summarily executes the couple without deference to the Law.

 

So, we must answer the question of why Yah openly favored Phinehas for carrying out this summary execution outside of these Torah provisions. Did Yah make an exception for Phinehas because he acted with Yah’s jealousy or zeal or passion? And in my mind’s eye, this is where the theory that the couple engaged in their abominable act within the confines of the Sanctuary makes some sense.

 

For all intents and purposes, the Tabernacle was sort of its own country within the congregation of Israel. Consequently, there is a separate set of rules governing Tabernacle operations. The Levites alone were responsible for overseeing all aspects of Tabernacle operations, including enforcing the maintenance of its utter sanctity.

 

53 But the Levites shall pitch round about the tabernacle of testimony, that there be no wrath upon the congregation of the children of Israel: and the Levites shall keep the charge of the tabernacle of testimony. (The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Nu 1:53.)

 

This being the case, and if the offense did in fact take place within the confines of the Tabernacle proper, then Phinehas fulfilled his duty as a Levitical Priest. He would have upheld the sanctity of the Tabernacle as Yah tasked the Levites with doing.

 

I, however, have a hard time believing that the couple engaged in their abominable act within the Tabernacle proper. Given all that we’ve discussed up to this point, I will concede that the traditional story of the couple engaging in Ba’al of Peor sex worship took place in Zimri’s tent is not accurate. It seems to me that the couple did what they did, and Phinehas did what he did, in a tent that members of our congregation set-up for Ba’al of Peor worship that was proximal (aka close) to the Sanctuary; maybe within the confines of the Sanctuary courtyard even. I can’t image that Moshe and the attending Levites would have permitted anyone other than a qualified Aaronic Priest to enter the Tent of Meeting in the first place. But if we had erected a tent for Ba’al worship somewhere near the Sanctuary grounds, Phinehas would have been legally justified in dispatching the couple the way he did.

 

But that’s just my thoughts and reflections on this matter. What do you think? How do you read and understand these passages? What spiritual applications can you draw from this part of our story that will enhance your walk in Messiah?

____________________________________________________

 

Now that we have this background established before us, we can delve into this week’s Reading, which is contained in Numbers 25:10-26:51.

 

For our time together here today, we will only discuss Numbers 25:10-15, which reads:

 

 

10And יהוה spoke to Mosheh, saying,

11“Pineḥas, son of El‛azar, son of Aharon the priest, has turned back My wrath from the children of Yisra’ěl, because he was ardent with My ardour in their midst (i.e. Phinehas was jealous/passionate/zealous with My jealousy/passion/zeal), so that I did not consume the children of Yisra’ěl in My ardour. 12“Therefore say, ‘See, I am giving him My covenant of peace, 13and it shall be to him and to his seed after him a covenant of an everlasting priesthood, because he was ardent for his Elohim, and made atonement for the children of Yisra’ěl.’ ” 14And the name of the man of Yisra’ěl who was struck, who was struck with the Miḏyanite woman, was Zimri, son of Salu, a leader of a father’s house among the Shim‛onites. 15And the name of the Miḏyanite woman who was struck was Kozbi the daughter of Tsur. He was head of the people of a father’s house in Miḏyan. (The Scriptures, 3rd edition. (Northriding: Institute for Scripture Research, 2009), Nu 25:10–15.)

 

 

Yah tells Moshe that Phinehas’ righteous actions turned His righteous anger/wrath away from us. Yah described Phinehas’ actions as that of being “jealous with His jealousy.” Phinehas’ jealousy prevented our destruction.

 

Who was Phinehas? He was the son of the current High Priest, Eleazar. (1 Chr 6:4-15) So, he was an Aaronic Priest serving under His high priestly father, Eleazar.

 

 

 

Let’s talk about what Yehovah meant by describing Phinehas as being “jealous with His jealousy.”

Phinehas remained in solidarity with Yehovah amid great apostasy. R. Dennis Cole describes this as “the likemindedness of Phinehas with that of Yahweh.” (R. Dennis Cole, Numbers, vol. 3B, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2000), 443.)

The Hebrew term for “jealous/jealousy” as used in our text is “qana’”. “Qana” means to express “qin’ah” (i.e. zeal or passion) against something or against the offensive actions of another. Here in our reading, “Phinehas expressed God’s own zeal; he acted on his behalf.” (Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21–36: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, vol. 4A, Anchor Yale Bible (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2008), 289.) It can also be described as “to become deeply impassioned” or “to become furiously jealous.” (R. Dennis Cole, Numbers, vol. 3B, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2000), 443.) The word, from this idiomatic sense, would carry the same emotion as that of a husband who believes or knows that his wife has been cheating on him (i.e. Num 5:11-31). Such a one is sorely jealous towards his wife. Thus, in like manner, Yehovah demands faithfulness from His bride (e.g. Exo 20:4-5). Any such transgression by Yah’s set apart people to the contrary (i.e. whoring after false gods as in the case of Ba’al of Peor) is subject to Yehovah’s holy and righteous wrath, which we’ve seen manifested in the form of plagues and summary executions of members of our community throughout our story line in recent weeks.

 

Qanna/jealous/passion/zeal for the things of Yehovah as expressed in our reading is not unique to our reading passage. Eliyahu (aka Elijah) declares to Yehovah when asked why he was hiding out in a cave: “I have been very zealous (aka “qana’”) for Yahweh the God of hosts (note, the LXX records Eliyahu as answering Yah: “Being zealous (aka qana’), I am zealous (aka qin’ah’) for Yehovah because…”), for the ⌊Israelites⌋ have forsaken your covenant. They have demolished your altars, and they have killed your prophets with the sword. I alone am left over, and they seek to take my life. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), 1 Ki 19:10.)

 

Then over in Zechariah, Yehovah declares His zealousness (aka jealousy/qana’) over Yerushalayim and Zion: “Thus says Yahweh of hosts: ‘⌊I am exceedingly jealous (aka “qana’” for Zion⌋; I am jealous (aka “qin’ah”) for it with great wrath.’ (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Zec 8:2.) Here, Yah declares out of His zeal/jealousy/passion – His “qana’” for Jerusalem and Zion, that He will destroy (aka “killah“) those who have destroyed her.

 

Because of Phinehas’ zealous act, Yah established with him and his seed a new covenant. This new covenant Yah referred to as His Covenant of Peace (i.e. “beriti shalom”). The covenant of peace was to be an everlasting priesthood built upon Phinehas’ zealousness for His Elohim and the atonement he made on our behalf that day. Yah reckoned Phinehas as righteous because of this one righteous act (Psa 106:28-31) – his “qana’”.

 

Mattathias of the Maccabees fame, upon his deathbed, called his sons to the same level of zealousness for Torah and the Covenant that Phinehas possessed:

 

50 Now therefore, my sons, be ye zealous for the law, and give your lives for the covenant of your fathers. (The Apocrypha: King James Version (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995), 1 Mac 2:50.) 54 Phinehas our father in being zealous and fervent obtained the covenant of an everlasting priesthood. (The Apocrypha: King James Version (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995), 1 Mac 2:54.)

 

It was this zealousness that propelled the Maccabees to defeating the great Macedonian military.

 

“The Rule of the Blessings” liturgical scroll from Qumran calls for a renewal of the Covenant of Peace to be placed over the Essene Community (1QSb 3:26).

 

By virtue of his Aaronic lineage, Phinehas was already assured the priestly privileges. His righteous act and the ensuing eternal covenant of peace confirmed his divinely appointed priestly destiny.

 

Phinehas’ priesthood would later be referred to as the Zadokite Priesthood. (Eze 44:15-16) Phinehas’ priestly dynasty was chosen by Yehovah to serve Him in His House of Prayer forever:

 

15 But the Levitical priests, the descendants of Zadok, who cared for the responsibility of my sanctuary ⌊when the Israelites went astray⌋ from me, they will approach me to serve me, and they will stand ⌊before me⌋ to offer to me fat and blood,” ⌊declares⌋ the Lord Yahweh. 16 “They shall come to my sanctuary, and they shall approach my table to serve me, and they will observe my requirement. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 44:15–16.)

 

Beyond this talk of being zealous or passionate for those things that Yehovah is zealous or passionate about, the covenant of peace that emerged from Phinehas’ act is really about an everlasting priesthood (i.e. Berit kehunnat ‘olam”). This everlasting priesthood was to be headed and inspired by the zealous spirit of Phinehas.

 

It should be noted that Yah placed no stipulations upon Phinehas nor his seed in order for this covenant to remain in force. Some would label this as a unilateral or non-conditional covenant, although in reality, Yah did not cut a truly conditional covenant with us. All of Yah’s covenant promises are irrevocable and permanent, despite what we do to infringe upon or transgress the tenets of those covenants.

 

The permanence of this covenant was reiterated by Yehovah when we went into Babylonian Captivity:

 

10 For the mountains may depart, and the hills may sway, but my faithfulness shall not depart from you, and my covenant of peace shall not sway,” says Yahweh, who has compassion on you… (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Is 54:10.)

 

That same covenant of peace will continue into the Millennial Kingdom:

 

24 And I, Yahweh, I will be for them ⌊as God⌋, and my servant David will be a leader in the midst of them. I, Yahweh, I have spoken. 25 And I will make them a covenant of peace, and I will put an end to wild animals from the land, and they will dwell in the desert ⌊safely⌋, and they will sleep in the forest. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 34:24–25.)

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

The direct descendants of Phinehas who are privileged of Yehovah to render priestly services unto Him in the Millennial Kingdom were the sons of Zadok. Zadok means “righteous”. Zadok is derived from the Hebrew noun “the Lord is righteous.”

 

Who was Zadok? He was a Levitical Priest who was loyal to King David. (2 Sam 8:17; 1 Chr 6:3-8) Zadok continued to serve as a Cohen (aka priest) into Solomon’s reign. During David’s reign as king, Ithamar’s descendants served as High Priests. The scriptures show Zadok anointed Solomon and took on the role of High Priest (1 Kin 1:39-45). However, Ithamar’s corrupted descendants, coupled with Zadok’s abiding loyalty to kings David and Solomon, led to the high priesthood being passed on to Zadok’s descendants. This change in the high priesthood was not a knee-jerk reaction to the corruption that had crept into the priestly ranks. In response to the corruption of Eli’s priestly line, Yah declared He would raise up for Himself a reliable priest (1 Sam 2:35). Thus, the Zadokite high priestly dynasty emerged. We often refer to these righteous descendants of Zadok as Zadokim or the Zadokites.

 

Despite several texts certifying Zadok descended from Aaron and Eleazar, other texts seem to suggest otherwise. Some scholars allege that Zadok was not of Aaron’s and Eleazar’s lineage and that he descended from an unknown line that certain scribes have gone to great lengths to erase. I personally doubt Zadok descended from any priestly line other than Eleazar’s and Phinehas’. We see in our reading this week that Yehovah promised Phinehas an everlasting priesthood of peace. Zadok and his priestly dynasty matches to a tee the zeal (i.e. “qana’”) for the priestly office as originated by Phinehas. Furthermore, Yehovah, through His Prophet Ezekiel certified Zadok descended from Aaron and Eleazar. (Eze 4:46)

 

The steadfast loyalty of Zadok’s sons to the exacting ways of Yehovah and their priestly responsibilities caught Yehovah’s attention. Through His prophet Ezekiel, Yah appointed the sons of Zadok to be His select priestly line to serve Him in His Son’s millennial kingdom.

 

And the chamber ⌊with its face to the north⌋ is for the priests who are taking care of the responsibility of the altar. They are the descendants of Zadok, the ones who approach from among the descendants of Levi to Yahweh to serve him. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 40:46.)

 

And you must give to the Levitical priests who are from the offspring of Zadok, the ones coming near me,” ⌊declares⌋ the Lord Yahweh, “to serve me, a bull, ⌊a calf⌋ as a sin offering. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 43:19.)

 

15 But the Levitical priests, the descendants of Zadok, who cared for the responsibility of my sanctuary ⌊when the Israelites went astray⌋ from me, they will approach me to serve me, and they will stand ⌊before me⌋ to offer to me fat and blood,” ⌊declares⌋ the Lord Yahweh. 16 “They shall come to my sanctuary, and they shall approach my table to serve me, and they will observe my requirement. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 44:15–16.)

 

11 To the priests, the ones being consecrated from the descendants of Zadok, who took care of my service and who ⌊did not go astray⌋ ⌊when the Israelites went astray⌋, ⌊just as⌋ the Levites went astray. 12 And it will be for them a special gift from the contribution of the land ⌊as a most holy object⌋ next to the territory of the Levites. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Eze 48:11–12.)

 

What we see playing out here is evidence that Yah will surely keep His covenant promise to Phinehas of an eternal covenant of peace.

 

Loyal and zealous Zadok didn’t just serve as a priest during David’s rule. He also served as a fierce warrior in David’s army. Yehovah had taken Saul’s rule over Israel away from him and gave it over to David. (1 Chr 12) We find in 1 Chronicles and Josephus (Ant. VII. ii. 2) record of Zadok serving David as a military commander in battles against Israel’s enemies (i.e. against the Jebusites and Philistines).

 

The priests, Joshua son of Jehozadak and Ezra, that accompanied us in our return to the Land from Babylonian captivity were Zadok descendants (Ezr 7:1-7). Even during the time of our captivity, these sons of Zadok remained true to their priestly calling. As a result, Yah’s hand was upon Ezra (7:6). The zeal of the Zadokite priests remained through the time of the Maccabees, after which political intrigue all but forced them underground and out of service. Some believe, as I, that the priestly descendants of Zadok abandoned the second Temple in Jerusalem and took up residence in Qumran. The Essenes of Qumran, as evident in some of their sacred texts (aka the Dead Sea Scrolls), extolled the legitimacy and virtue of the Zadokite priesthood. Some scholars speculate that the Qumran Essenes included members of the Zadokite priesthood. I find this theory to be plausible, given the zeal we know the Essenes held for Yehovah and His Ways. These believed that the Jerusalem Temple establishment was irreparably corrupt. Thus, these Zadokim uprooted themselves from the politics and corruption of the Jerusalem temple establishment and resettled in Qumran where they safeguarded the oracles of Yehovah (aka the Dead Sea Scrolls). 

 

Interestingly, some have linked the first century Jewish sect of the Sadducees with the Zadokite priestly line. Certain scholars have declared that the title Sadducee is derived from Zadok. (Reference: Mark Allan Powel, Harper Collins Bible Dictionary) Michael Rood in his Gospel Chronology is a firm advocate of this thinking. We know from the Gospel record that the first century priestly line (i.e. the Sadducees) was indeed irreparably corrupt. To think that the Sadducees were of the same timber as the righteous sons of Zadok is suspect to me. I tend to side with the righteous Zadok line, finding her last recorded location in Qumran to be more in line with the zealous character of Phinehas to be the most plausible theory of the two.

 

__________________________________________________________

 

Baruch A. Levine, in his commentary on the Book of Numbers, made the bold move of renaming the Covenant of Peace to that of a Covenant of Fellowship:

 

“Behold, I am granting him my covenant, fellowship.” That is to say, my covenant will consist of fellowship. (Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21–36: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, vol. 4A, Anchor Yale Bible (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2008), 289.)

 

When I first came across Levine’s statement, I rejected it outright, but then I reflected upon it. It later became clear to me that indeed one of Yehovah’s deepest desires and goals is to establish a relationship and be in loving and peaceful fellowship with His chosen ones. Yet, when we are in a rebellious state of being, as we were during our time of apostacy in Shittim, there can be no such fellowship with Him.

 

When we choose Yehovah and His ways over that of the world and its ways, we have the privilege of partaking of this covenant of peace, aka, this covenant of fellowship. Yehovah is zealous (aka “qana’”) about His standards and about His people remaining true to Him and His ways. He described Himself to us as being a jealous (aka “qana’”) God; a consuming fire (Exo 34:14; Deu 4:24). He commanded and informed us that:

 

9 Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them (i.e. false gods): for I the LORD thy God am a jealous (aka “qana’”) God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me…(The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Dt 5:9–6:15.)

 

We cannot truly walk in covenant with Yehovah unless we are zealous/passionate/jealous – “qana’” about the things that He is zealous/passionate/jealous about. There must be a singleness of heart and mind between us and our Elohim for there to be true fellowship. The prophet asked a key question of us as Yah prepared to punish us for our iniquities:

 

Can two walk together, except they be agreed? (The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Am 3:3.) And of course, the answer to this critical question is no. We cannot be in fellowship with the Creator of the Universe when we are at odds with Him and His ways. That’s why He brought a devastating plague upon us in response to our disgusting apostacy with Ba’al of Peor. We had broken fellowship with Him because we sought after and worshiped Ba’al. It wasn’t until Phinehas displayed such burning zeal (aka “qana’”) for Yehovah and His ways and stood against our apostacy that Yehovah stayed the plague and restored fellowship or “shalom” between us and Him.

 

Master Yahoshua possessed such passion/zeal/jealousy/”qana’” for Yehovah and His House (aka the Temple) that He cleanse the Temple Mount of the merchants and money changers (Joh 2:14-17). Such “qana’” was prophesied to be an established character trait of the Messiah:

 

8 I have become a stranger to my brothers and a foreigner to my mother’s sons,

9 because the zeal for your house (i.e. your Temple) has consumed me, and the reproaches of those reproaching you have fallen on me. (W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Ps 69:8–9.)

 

If our consuming aim is to make it into the Kingdom, we must imitate our Master Yeshua in every way possible. This includes being “qana’” or zealous for the things of Yehovah. Our “qana’” for the things of Yehovah must consume us, as it did Yahoshua and Phinehas. And if we find ourselves with such burning passion/jealousy/zeal/”qana’” for the things and ways of Yehovah, He will honor us by cutting and maintaining a covenant of peace or fellowship with us.

 

How do we get to the place in our walk with Messiah that we possess such a consuming, burning passion for the things and ways of Yehovah? Well, we must seek — pursue Yehovah’s righteousness and His kingdom. And the easiest way of accomplishing this is to believe Master Yeshua and commit to walking only in His ways. And the only way we can accomplish this is to devour Yah’s Word, pray without ceasing, obey His instructions in righteousness, and listen to His voice, because Yah’s Ways are our Master’s Ways.

 

In so doing, we begin to develop a deep and abiding relationship with Master Yahoshua and His Father. Over time, we will become jealous/”qana’” with Yehovah’s jealousy/”qin’ah” because we are being transformed into the image of Master Yeshua. (Rom 8:29; Col 3:10) Consequently, Yeshua is the splitting image of His Father. (Heb 10:1)

 

Now, more than at any other time in history, Yehovah’s elect must be “qana’” with Yehovah’s “qana’” (Num 25:11). The world has devolved to such a state that that which is good is considered by the world as evil and that which is evil the world now sees as good. (Isa 5:20) Yah declares His fierce anger upon those who embrace such foolishness. It thus falls to us, Yah’s chosen ones, to jealously walk in His righteous ways and teach the world to do so as well. Yah is counting on us to image Him in this fallen, corrupt world. He’s given us all we need to accomplish this: He’s given us His Holy Spirit and His Word. And if we are willing to hold the line, using the resources He’s placed at our disposal, we can’t help but be victorious and forever in peaceful/fellowship covenant with our Creator.

 

The apostle wrote to the Messianic Roman Assembly:

 

35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? 36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. 37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. 38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, 39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ro 8:35–39.)

 

Have a blessed Sabbath and an overcoming week in Yeshua Messiah, beloved of Yehovah.

 

Take care.

 

Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works or Keeping Torah in Favor of Faith? Part 2 of The New Testament Validates the Necessity of Torah Living for God’s People Series

by | Mar 18, 2022 |

This is “Does Paul Discourage God’s People from doing Good Works in Favor of Faith?” This will be part 2 of our Paul Officially Validates Torah Living for God’s People series.   Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 4:1-8. But we will pay...

read more

Biblical Rosh Hashanah 2022 Update

by | Mar 3, 2022 |

Starting off, I would be remiss if I did not connect this update with my last post entitled "Why I Keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar and not the Other Popular Messianic Calendars." In that post, I gave five reasons why I keep the Torah (Observational) Calendar....

read more