Blaspheming the Name of God-Part-2 of the Series A Question of One’s Jewishness

Picking-Up Where We Left Off 

 

What I want to do this week is to pick-up from where we left off from the last installment of this series within a series which was entitled: “You Are Called a Jew” and move on through verses 19 through 24 in this installment. 

And the title for this week’s post is: “Blaspheming the Name of God.” Still part of this “A Question of One’s Jewishness” series.

 A Challenging Title 

Now, I’m sure that the title “Blaspheming the Name of God” will get the attention of a small number of discerning or rather discriminating folks of Faith who are sensitive to the whole concept of blasphemy. 

I also suspect that most folks who come across this title will bypass or overlook it because it’s not tantalizing—provocative or controversial enough for them. Most folks don’t care to know anything about the subject of blaspheming the Name of our Elohim simply because they feel it’s an act or action that is below them. That is, they are not going to find themselves in a blasphemous state. Or worse, they suspect they’ve may have committed blasphemy at some point in their lives and they simply don’t want to come to terms with the ramification of their having committed such a transgression.

 An Important Topic

Regardless, blaspheming (otherwise referred to as shaming, polluting, defiling, profaning) the Name of Yah is an important subject that we must not shy away from. And it is here in our focus passage of Romans 2:19-24 that Shaul lays the blame for the Goyim’s blaspheming of the Name at the feet of his rhetorical religious figure.

 Not So Much About What We Call Him 

I will tell you right now before we get too much further along into our discussion here today, that Blasphemy of the Name of YHVH is NOT the same as Blasphemy of or against the Holy Spirit. Contextually speaking, they are two different felonies altogether, although the commission of either carries with it severe, even dire consequences.

 Two Separate Transgressions

Scripture affirms that despite the deadly consequences that Father has often attached to these transgressions, He will forgive the one, who for whatever reason blasphemes His Name, if they repent and seek His forgiveness (Matthew 12:31-32).

On the other hand, Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (otherwise known as the “Unpardonable Sin”),” according to our Master, if committed, will never be forgiven, regardless the reason one commits it (Matthew12:31-32; Mark 3:28-29; Luke 12:10). 

Now, because I don’t want to get off-track from our focus topic and passage, we won’t tackle this very hard to take in subject of the Unpardonable Sin. We will tackle it in another installment of this program, Abba willing.

 Our Plan of Attack

 So today we will define exactly what it means to blaspheme or pollute the Name of Yehovah; the consequences for committing such a transgression; and what needs to be done to correct all incidents of this critical sin. 

But before we tackle this particular concern about blaspheming the Name, let’s work our way up to our focus verse of 2:24 by examining verses 19 through 23 first.

 Looking Back

I would ask you to recall from our last installment that much of our discussion centered around our examination of the character of Shaul’s rhetorical religious figure.  (And if you’ve not taken the opportunity to read or listen to that post, I humbly invite you to do so.) The rhetorical figure Shaul was describing in his diatribe was the “religious Jew.” And we saw Shaul begin his literary sketch of the “religious Jew,” who took great pride and comfort, not in his covenant relationship with Yehovah, but in his Jewishness: his heritage; his culture; his biology and such.

 Serious Spiritual Deficiencies

And we didn’t need to go too much deeper into the chapter to realize that in Shaul’s mind, his rhetorical, religious figure was in severe spiritual trouble, especially when we contextually factor into his literary sketch of this figure, Shaul’s earlier assertion that a judgment would be levied upon those who reject the Ways of the Almighty (2:12). Those who claimed Torah but did not walk in Torah would be judged within the framework of Torah, while those who knew nothing of Torah would be judged outside the framework of Torah; namely by the testimony of Yah’s creation. 

So with that, let’s continue our examination of Shaul’s religious figure, beginning with verses 19 and 20.

 Paul Confronts Religious Conceitedness 

 

“And [you religious Jew] are confident (Greek of “peitho” which means to be confident or persuaded) that thou thyself art a guide (Greek of “hodegos” which means a leader of the way; a teacher of the ignorant and inexperienced) of the blind (Greek of “tuphlos” which means of the mentally blind), a light of them which are in darkness (Greek for “skotos” which is a metaphor); an instructor of the foolish (Greek of “aphron” which means those without intelligence and who act rashly), a teacher of babes (Greek for “nepios” which means the untaught and unskilled), which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law (that is, because you have in the law the essential features of knowledge and of the truth).”

 

It should not be too difficult to recognize here that this religious figure is conceited. To be conceited is to be excessively proud of oneself to the point of being vain. Otherwise described in scripture as being wise in one’s own eyes (Pro. 3:7).

 The Dangers of Being Conceited

Throughout scripture we are warned of the dangers of being conceited. We are told that conceit has the potential of bringing one to destruction (Prov. 26:12; Isa. 5:21; Rom. 1:22; 12:16; 1 Cor. 8:1-2). The prophet Isaiah declared:

 

“Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes (I.e., conceited)” (Isa. 5:21; NKJV).

 Conceit Leads to Spiritual Darkness

Master taught that conceitedness leads to spiritual darkness in one’s life. Consequently, spiritual darkness creates a great spiritual tripping or falling hazard (Mat. 6:23; 15:14). Therefore, it stands to reason that conceit can cause one to be blind to their sins. And blindness to our sins creates a separation between us and Yah (Joh. 9:40-41). 

Clearly this is a primary concern the apostle had as it related to such religious figures as described in our focus passage. And sadly, our Faith Community is not lacking her share of conceited persons: each of them primed for a great fall if they do not turn from conceited ways.

 Accumulation of Knowledge Puffs One Up

You know, there’s something about the accumulation of knowledge–be it general knowledge or Torah knowledge–that causes, as the apostle describes, one to become puffed up, or in our modern western parlance: full of themselves; feeling as though they’ve arrived (1 Cor. 8:1). 

There is nothing wrong with being knowledgeable, especially knowledgeable of the Ways of Yah. But that knowledge is problematic when it causes us to take our eyes off the originator of that knowledge and put it on ourselves; when that knowledge becomes the thing that we take pride in and rest our eternal destiny on. For the only thing we should take pride in is our Elohim-our relationship with Elohim. That knowledge that we strive to accumulate and then hoard to ourselves is useless if it’s not properly put to the work of the gospel and promoting the Kingdom of Yah.

 The Religious Jew as a Light and Teacher

Shaul brings up the issue of the religious Jew believing that by virtue of his Jewishness that he is the light and teacher to the blind world. And these are indeed interesting topics that I want to discuss. But we will for now save them for a future installment of this program, Abba willing. 

Moving on to 2:21-22

 

“Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? Thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? Thou that abhorrest (the Greek is bdelusso which means to turn oneself away from on account of the stench or metaphorically to detest) idols, does thou commit sacrilege (that is, do you rob temples-speaking of the looting of pagan temple riches)?”

 The Hypocrisy of the Religious One

The central theme or issue of concern here that should be evident to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear is that of “hypocrisy.” Shaul’s rhetorical figure appears to be, in addition to being conceited, a flaming hypocrite. 

Our Master confronted the conceitedness and hypocrisy that was common among the religious Jews of His day:

 

Matthew 7:3-5–“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

 

Matthew 23:3-4–“All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe (that being of Torah), that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.”

 

Shaul earlier in this letter also confronted these conditions when he wrote:

 

“Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself, for thou that judgest doest the same things” (Rom. 2:1).

 Robbing Pagan Temples

Now, Shaul’s reference to “committing sacrilege” is best translated in our modern parlance as “robbing temples.” And the temples in question here are pagan temples, not the Mishkan (or Temple) in Yerushalayim. 

Turns out that despite Torah’s prohibition against Yah’s set-apart people having anything to do with the idolatry and paganistic practices by their neighbors (such as recorded in Deuteronomy 7:25-26), it was not uncommon for certain Jews to steal articles from pagan temples. And these common thieves, if you will, would either adorn their homes with these expensive items, or simply sell them for personal financial gain. This is otherwise known as “Jewish plundering of pagan temples.” And it goes without saying that such acts not only violated Yah’s prohibition against stealing, but also against self-defilement: for one who handles pagan-related objects would by default be made impure or polluted and not eligible for worship.

 The Contrary Nature of the Religious Jew 

So, what we should start to see emerge from our reading of the apostle’s literary description of the religious Jew here is the bottom line or gist to what his diatribe was meant to convey. In effect, Shaul purposed to confront some of his kinsmen’s contrary behavior (but not necessarily against any specific Roman Messianic Jews): their conceitedness; their hypocrisy; their contrariness of heart; their intentional transgressions against Yah’s Torah. For these individuals in particular fail to practice that which they, by calling themselves Jews or Yisra’el or children of Avraham, would be expected to do. And connecting this understanding back to our earlier discussions on this chapter of Romans, such religious personalities, just like the unconverted gentile, were subject to judgment (2:12,16). And because these proudly proclaim they are the keepers and teachers of Torah, they will face judgment within the framework of Torah. In fact, the very thing–Torah–which they customarily use to condemn the gentile will ultimately be the thing that will condemn them. 

Again, this is general rhetoric against Jewish disobedience and sin–better, against all religious disobedience and sin that the apostle is framing here. This is not an indictment against all Jews nor against his Roman Messianic Jewish readers.

Our Focus Passage

And finally, we get to the crux of our focus passage 2:23-24, which reads:

 

“You who make your boast in the Law, do you dishonor (the Greek being “atimazo” which means to treat with insult in word, deed or even thought) God through breaking the Law? For the Name of Yah is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you, as it is written” (cf. Eze. 16:27; 36:22 Isa. 52:5)

 Father’s Reputation Is Everything

Father’s reputation means everything to Him. And when His people decide to act a fool and openly transgress His Torah while proudly proclaiming to be one of His, well they grossly dishonor Him. And that dishonoring of Yah leads, most painfully, into “blasphemy of the Name of Yah among the Gentiles (verse 24).” The Gentiles blaspheme Yah on account of Yah’s wayward people’s evident contrariness. The Jew of Shaul’s day made a spectacle of themselves as a result of their blatant disobedience in the sight of the Gentile nation peoples of the world. And their spectacle led to those very Gentile nations blaspheming Yah’s Name.

 

Malachi 1:6–“A son naturally honors his father and a slave respects his master. If I am your father, where is My honor? If I am your master, where is My respect? YHVH who rules over all asks you this, you priests who make light of My Name! But you reply, ‘How have we made light of your Name” (NET)?

 

The primary Tanakh passage that I feel best supports our focus passage is Ezekiel 36, beginning with verse 17:

 

“Son of man, when the house of Israel was living on their own land, they defiled it by their behavior and their deeds. In My sight their behavior was like the uncleanness of a woman having her monthly period. So I poured My anger on them because of the blood they shed on the land and because of the idols with which they defiled it. I scattered them among the nations; they were dispersed throughout foreign countries. In accordance with their behavior and their deeds I judged them. But when they arrived in the nations where they went, they profaned My holy Name. It was said of them, ‘These are the people of YHVH, yet they have departed from His land.’ I was concerned for My holy reputation which the House of Israel profaned among the nations where they went” (17-21; NET).

 Blasphemy of the Name is a Transgression of Torah

To blaspheme or profane the Name (that is the Name by which we call our Elohim and everything having to do with the Person-the character-authority-glory-presence of the Creator) of YHVH is a transgression of Torah.

 

Leviticus 19:12–“You shall not swear by My Name falsely, and so profane the Name of your Elohim: I am YHVH” (ESV).

 

Leviticus 24:16–“Whoever blasphemes the Name of YHVH shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death” (ESV).

 A Personal Example

Thinking back to my days as an officer in the U.S. Navy: if one were to commit certain crimes or behave in a certain way and just so happened to get caught, tried and convicted of those crimes or misdeeds, he or she stood to lose his/her commission, benefits and retirement on account of behavior that was “unbecoming of an officer of the U.S. Military.” You see, the military officer corps is supposed to represent or image the finest ideals and values of each branch of service. And when an officer acts in a manner contrary to those values and ideals, they bring dishonor to that branch of service. So, in order to ensure that those established ideals and values are reinforced, the leadership of the branch of service that is in question, will charge the offending officer with the crime of “behavior unbecoming of an officer” of whichever branch of service is involved. And because of that charge, the officer pretty much loses everything he or she worked for up to that point in their career.

 Shaming and Dishonoring the Name

This is, in a sense, what we’re talking about when we’re talking about shaming, polluting, dishonoring and blaspheming the Name of YHVH? That is, Yah’s elect bringing shame and dishonor to the Name of YHVH; sullying the reputation of our Elohim before the nation peoples of the world which has the potential of enticing the unbelieving world to also blaspheme His Name.

 The Church Triumphant is Guilty of Blaspheming the Name

The Church Triumphant has done a fine job polluting the Name of Yah and causing the world at large to blaspheme Yah’s holy and righteous Name. And they’ve done so as a result of their failure to uphold and live in accordance with the tenets, ideals and values of the true Faith once delivered. For they fail to teach their people to obey Yah’s Word and to walk in covenant with the Eternal. They instead encourage their people to walk in accordance with the ways and traditions of their religion and organizations, which ideally suits the desires and preferences of their members. And to add insult to injury, these have a tendency of behaving just like their counterparts in the world. Shaul describes these as “having a form of Godliness, but [they-by their contrary living] deny its power…” (2 Tim. 3:5). 

This, of course, happens while the leaders of these organizations, along with their members, proudly claim the Name of YHVH as their own. Consequently, the secular world sees and recognizes the church’s hypocrisy and contrariness and mocks and blasphemes the Name of YHVH. 

Folks, I get that the vast majority of members of the Church Triumphant are generally not of Yah’s elect-His set-apart, covenant walking people. But the fact of the matter is that these have general possession and  knowledge of Yah’s set-apart Word. And thus, they have no excuse for not walking in accordance with Yah’s Way of Life. 

The Apostle Peter expounded upon the consequences of Yah’s so-called elect dishonoring, shaming and blaspheming His Name in his 2nd Epistle:

 

“And many will follow their debauched lifestyles. Because of these false teachers (and by extension, because of the example of the contrary, hypocritical, errant Jew and Messianic or even Christian), the Way of Truth will be slandered (or better, blasphemed, reviled, or even treated with contempt)” (2 Pet. 2:2).

 Our Ancient Cousins Caused the Gentiles to Blaspheme His Name

In the days of the Hebrew Prophets, Yisra’el’s sins led to the nation’s exile and captivity. Going into exile and captivity, the nation’s reputation preceded them. Their Gentile captors and or conquerors knew they claimed themselves to be YHVH’s chosen people. However, those same captors and conquerors knew the Hebrews to be hypocrites and inconsistent in their profession and living out their faith. This naturally led to these belligerent nations openly mocking and dishonoring YHVH–effectively blaspheming His authority, holiness and sovereignty. 

What Do We Really Mean by Blaspheming the Name of God?

So, what’s the real deal when it comes to one blaspheming, defiling, polluting or profaning the Name of YHVH? I think we can all agree that none of us wants to be guilty of such a transgression.

First and foremost, blaspheming or profaning Yah’s Name, in the context of our focus passage, does not necessarily refer to a mispronunciation or misappropriation of that name or title of which we call Him or refer to Him by: Either in one’s prayers, teachings, worship, exhortations or even general conversation. I will concede, however, that any misappropriation or irreverent references to the Name(s) that we refer to Father by, be it intentional or unintentional, is certainly not a wise thing to do. For Abba has declared He will not be mocked in any way, shape or form (Gal. 6:7).

Putting Blasphemy Into Proper Perspective

It seems that a lot of folks who are partial to the Sacred Names movement or similar denominations within the Hebrew Roots Faith, tend to use passages such as our focus passage to teach and promote the erroneous doctrine(s) that anyone who dares not pronounce the Name of Abba as they declare it to be, are guilty of blaspheming or profaning the Name of Yah. 

We will, however, quickly see that blaspheming, profaning, polluting the Name of Yah goes well beyond the realm of pronunciation or articulation of Abba’s Name.

 Blaspheming the Name Delves into the Improper Worship of YHVH

In Malachi 1:11-2:7, we find that Yisra’el failed to worship YHVH as He’d prescribed in His Torah. Malachi described to his readers that the Hebrews had engaged in “deceptive worship” of Yah. In other words, the Hebrews half-heartedly went through the motions of worship as prescribed in Torah, often cutting corners in their sacrifices to Yah. Furthermore, they were being hypocritical in their Faith walk: declaring to the world that they were righteous children of Yah, when in fact they were willfully transgressing Yah’s Torah at every turn. They were essentially engaging in spiritual adultery.

 YHVH Knows the Truth

 Unfortunately for them, the Eternal saw through their shenanigans. And thus, YHVH informed his cheating wife, Yisra’el, that His favor would be removed from them and ultimately passed on to the Goyim, otherwise referred to by the Hebrews as the heathen nations. Malachi prophesied that the Goyim would someday turn to YHVH as their Elohim (Mal. 1:11; Psm. 113:3; Isa. 45:6).

 Father Charges His People

Therefore, Father charged His people with profaning His Holy and Righteous Name. And one of the ways Father describes how Yisra’el profaned or blasphemed His Name was in her sacrificing animals that did not meet Torah’s exacting standards (Mal. 1:12-14; cf. Eze. 36:21-23).

 When we, who are supposed to be His chosen ones, willfully violate YHVH’s instructions that we vowed to keep, we insult Him and show contempt towards Him. It is a form of blaspheming or profaning His Holy Name.

What’s In a Name?

So, what do we mean by His Holy Name? Well, we talked about this earlier: His Name includes His authority; His sovereignty; His presence; His character; His glory; his wisdom; His holiness and righteousness; His Person or His Being.

 We find in the case of the Prophet Amos that profaning the Name of Yah by His people is not limited to their violating the Torah of sacrifices unto YHVH. Amos described the profanation of Yah’s Name as resulting from the mistreatment of the poor and destitute of the Land and gross sexual misconduct (2:7). 

So, we clearly see from these two examples that those who willfully behave contrary to Yah’s Torah bring shame to Yah’s Name. These effectively blaspheme the Name of YHVH. And Yah does not appreciate that at all.

 Torah-Teachers are Most Responsible

Of note are so-called Torah-teachers who willfully violate Yah’s Torah. These will be judged harshly by the very Torah they demand their students obey. 

The Levitical Priests were responsible for guarding and proclaiming Yah’s Name. In fact, Father viewed their worship of Him, when done according to His instructions, was a clear and brilliant manifestation of His Name being upheld, proclaimed and reverenced in the sight of the nation peoples of the world.

 The Levitical Priests of Malachi’s Day

So, we find that in Malachi’s day, that the priests miserably failed to uphold, proclaim and reverence Abba’s Name as they were specially commissioned to do. Given the contemptible nature of the peoples’ behavior and worship, they were scattered among the nations: booted out of the Land. And as a direct result their blaspheming the Name of Yah, the Holy, spiritual Name of the Creator of the Universe was desecrated and disgraced (I.e., profaned) by the nations that they were banished to.

 Abba Does Not Tolerate Disrespect

And Torah reveals that YHVH does not tolerate such gross disrespect, especially from His chosen ones (Lev. 22). And thus Yisra’el reaped what they’d sown by their contempt and irreverence of their Elohim’s Name. 

We find in each example where Yah’s people have profaned His Name, they demonstrated a disregard for the essential elements of purity, holiness and righteousness. Thus, when Yah’s people begin to disregard these essential elements in their worship of Yah or even in their day-to-day Faith walk, complete transgression of Torah and shaming of His Name is an inevitability.

 Righteousness-Holiness-Purity

Thus, righteousness, holiness and purity must be the basis upon which every Netzari’s relationship with the Almighty rests (Lev. 20:7; Psm. 24:4; Mat. 5:8; 1 Tim. 1:5; 2 Tim. 2.22; 1 Pet. 1:15-16). And this applies not only to our day-to-day behavior, but also to every aspect of our worship of Him. 

When a child of the Most High mistreats or holds the things of YHVH in contempt, he/she profanes Yah’s Name before the unbelieving world. And of course, we’ve see this being played out numerous times in denominational Christianity.

 A Recent Revelation

Just recently, revelation of the alleged years’ long corruption of a very prominent Christian apologist and teacher was made known to the world. And the details of this individual’s alleged corrupt ways, apparently now public record, not only brought shame upon his ministry and the many devoted workers of that ministry, but more so, it brought shame to the sacredness and purity that is supposed to be associated with the Christian Faith. Thus, the world has, through the revelation of this man’s corruption, found another excuse to hold the Name of YHVH in contempt. (It should be mentioned that this individual died prior to the details of his corruption being made public.) 

And thus, the Christian world is having to work through this hellacious stigma on several levels. But in the small number of posts that I’ve seen addressing this situation, the expressed concerns were for the reputation of this man’s organization and the well-being of the family. Indeed, these concerns are understandable. But the real concern that this organization needs to have is its role in blaspheming–its profaning the Name of YHVH to the unconverted of this world.

And what makes these matters worse, of course, is when the unbelieving world feels at even greater liberty to utter blasphemous—disrespectful—shameful words against the Creator of the Universe in response to His peoples’ acts of contempt towards and disrespect of their Elohim.

 Judgment is Coming

Is there no wonder why the Apostle Yochanan (John) wrote of a coming Great Tribulation that will overwhelm the nation-peoples of this world? I cannot help but think that a great deal of the tribulation that will be wrought upon the unredeemed population of this world will be in recompense for their widespread transgressing, profanation or blaspheming of Yah’s Name. 

Yah will not be disrespected nor His Name profaned, especially before the unredeemed:

 

“But I wrought for My Name’s sake, that it should not be polluted before the heathen, among whom they were, in whose sight I made Myself known unto them, in bringing them forth out of the land of Egypt” (Eze. 20:9).

 The Penalty for Blaspheming His Name

Any and all blasphemy of Yah’s Name will ultimately result in the offenders’ shame (ref. Nah. 3:5-6; Isa. 47:3; Jer. 13:27; Mal. 2:3). Yah is emphatic about this. Shaul warns:

 

“Be NOT deceived; Yah is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap” (Gal. 6:7).

 

And those who claim to belong to YHVH and are brazen enough to pollute His Name before the heathen, like Yah did with Yisra’el, those blasphemers will lose any protection and well-being that would come to them by virtue of their set-apart status:

 

Nevertheless, I withdrew mine hand, and wrought for my Name’s sake, that it should not be polluted in the sight of the heathen, in whose sight I brought them forth” (Eze. 20:22).

___________________________________________________________

 How Do We Avoid Blaspheming the Name of Yah?

Now, the opposite of defaming, profaning, blaspheming, shaming or polluting the Holy and Righteousness Name of Yah is to sanctify, glorify or proclaim it. And the way we sanctify, glorify and proclaim Yah’s Name is to do exactly the opposite of what people do to profane His Name. We keep His Ways and obey His instructions; we revere Him and magnify Him in every aspect of our lives. We don’t do, say or think of that which runs contrary to His holiness and righteousness, such that any who come into our circle of influence might use as an opportunity to doubt Yah; to scoff at Yah; to deny His sovereignty; to diminish Him in the eyes of others who may be seeking after Him. 

By our profession of Faith and our agreeing to walk in covenant with the Creator of the Universe, we carry within our being Yah’s holy and righteous Name. Anything we do that transgresses His Ways and our elect status, especially in the sight of the unredeemed of this world, blasphemes/profanes His Name.

 Personal Confession

I’ve personally had to repent and seek Abba’s forgiveness for this transgression a few times in My life. For I have been convicted a few times during my time walking in this Faith of ours that I did not represent Yah nor our Faith before those who I interacted with at some level or another. I’m talking neighbors, friends, family and co-workers. I am not proud of those times when I failed to uplift, glorify, magnify the Name of Yah before others; to imitate our Master Yeshua, but instead showed forth to them a less than flattering testimony. But the good news is that Yah’s Ruach (His Spirit) convicted me, and I have made things right with my Redeemer in this respect. Praise Yah.

 Call to Action

So, let’s make a very conscious effort to honor, sanctify and glorify the Name of YHVH in every area of our lives and not give opportunity to the enemy to blaspheme the Name of our loving, awesome and great Elohim. He alone deserves all the glory, honor and praise we can muster.

 

Praise Him! Shalom-shalom.

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

  My Torah Portion Observation of the Week I was profoundly moved by the section of this week’s Torah portion that recorded what on the surface seemed the very harsh and violent encounter we had with YHVH. It was Parashah 26: Sh’mini, Eight and I wish to briefly...

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

Select Your Passover Lamb

I'm Reminded I’m reminded when looking over our copy of the Hebrew Observational Calendar that today is the day that we would select the unblemished animal of the first-year that would serve as our paschal lamb. Choosing a Lamb Today Certainly, today, the vast...

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me..." (The Apostle Paul to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers) Well, I’m going to take a slight break from our series on the plurality of the Godhead series to tackle one of the Apostle Paul’s many difficult passages that the...

You Are Called a Jew-Part 1 of the Series: A Question of One’s Jewishness

Goal

 

Today we continue our exposition into some of the Apostle Paul’s most challenging and hard to understand writings and teachings, having just concluded in our previous post a discussion on the apostle’s naming the “gospel” as “my gospel.” (I would humbly encourage you, if you’ve not already done so, to listen to or read that post if you are so led. Contextually, it is not directly attached to today’s focus passage. But I will say that the previous 5-posts do build upon one another and do lay a firm foundation for understanding today’s focus passage.)

 

Today our focus passage is found in the Cepher (that is the book) of Romans 2:17-24. However, because this 8-verse passage is so content rich and I don’t want to give you a drink of this spiritual water (so to speak) from a fire-hose, but rather from a water-hose, I’ve chosen to break up this passage into parts and create, yet again, a series within a series which I’ve entitled: “A Question of One’s Jewishness.” So this being Part 1 of this new series within a series, I’ve chosen to only tackle verses 17 and 18 and give it a subtitle of: “Thou Art Called A Jew.”

 

Attention

Our focus passage for this post reads:

Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, and knowest His Will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law…

Quite a pronouncement heh? Indeed, a bit of content we need to unpack here. So let’s get into it.

There seems to be a couple prevalent lines of thought out there as it relates to what the apostle may be trying to convey to his readers here. And one line of thought or interpretation is that Shaul is articulating a general attitude he has developed against his Jewish brethren and against Judaism and Torah and he is using this opportunity to somehow clarify in the minds of his Roman readers where he stood on the issue of Judaism versus the True Faith once delivered and the Gospel. It’s as if he is, in a rather cynical manner, stripping off of Judaism, Jews and Torah any veneer–any luster–any perceived importance these elements may have once had in the minds of his readers, certainly with the ultimate goal of re-orienting his readers’ minds and hearts to focus only on the things related to “his gospel.”

That being said, we cannot ignore the fact that such contextually-unsubstantiated thinking carries with it an obvious degree of anti-Semitism and anti-Torah. And we will certainly find as we progress through this series discussions that this line of interpretation or thought holds no contextual water whatsoever.

The other line of thinking or interpretation to consider here is that Shaul is specifically targeting those dreaded Judaizers who appear to have been lurking about the Roman Kehila or assemblies–those same ones who were “troubling” the Gentile members to convert to Judaism in order for them to be a part of the Body of Messiah or of The Way Movement. And in his targeting of those Judaizers it is believed that the apostle’s goal was to firmly put them in their place (that is to strip them of any authority and influence they held) and empower the Gentile converts of the assemblies to pay those Judaizers no mind and to focus exclusively on the gospel and teachings that he and his evangelistic team sought to bring to them.

Certainly, this line of interpretation holds more contextual water than the first. But we will see as with the first line of interpretation or thinking that there is no evidence that the apostle is necessarily targeting any specific Judaizers of the Roman Assembly here in this passage.

Now, a third line of thinking or interpretation of this passage is based upon a rather rational and pragmatic understanding of the language and literary styles commonly found in scripture and in extra-biblical writings of Shaul’s day. For we find here in this passage, as well as in other Pauline passages, and even in some of the teachings and discussions that our Master Yeshua engaged in, the use of a literary method referred to by some as a “diatribe.”

 

A diatribe is defined in dictionaries as a “forceful and bitter verbal attack, criticism or denunciation of or against someone or something.”

 

Shaul uses a diatribe style of writing here in this passage: A style commonly used by a number of ancient Greco-Roman philosophers and polemicists. This style, according to Bible Commentator Craig S. Keener, was used primarily to “teach and exhort rather than attack” (IVP Bible Background Commentary on the New Testament).

 

Now, the framework of most diatribes involves that of an “imaginary opponent” taking the idealized improper or wrong position on the subject at hand. In the case of our focus passage here, the speaker or framer of the content being discussed–who is in this case the Apostle Shaul–uses the diatribe as a literary tool with the purpose of destroying his imaginary opponent’s position or perspective on the issue and topic that is set before his Roman readers. And he achieves the goal of destroying his imaginary opponent’s position or perspective by systematically “reducing it–the imaginary opposer’s position on the issue–to its absurd logical conclusion” (Keener; pg. 418).

 

The opponent of Shaul’s diatribe here is the “religious Jew” whose primary, manifested faults we will see, is his hypocrisy; his arrogance; his bigotry; his disobedience to Torah; and his blindness to name just a few.

 

As common to this passage, and in several other places in the apostles’ writings, the speaker employs what is described by Keener as “brief, pointed rhetorical questions” (ibid).

 

The thing about Shaul’s, and even our Master’s recorded diatribes in the Gospel accounts, is that the “someone,” the focus of their criticisms or denunciations, were rhetorical persons; generally idealistic persons; classes or types of people who demonstrated qualities or traits that were un-Godly and contrary to the qualities and traits that Yah’s set-apart ones should possess and practice. In particular, Shaul’s criticism or denunciation, especially as it relates to our focus passage, was being leveled against rhetorical Jews, better described as “religious Jew,” while in the case of Yeshua, His rhetoric was generally leveled at the Jewish leaders (I.e., the scribes and pharisees) of His day.

 

That being said, as far as we can tell, the apostle’s diatribe here in our focus passage doesn’t seem to be leveled at any specific person or persons; unlike the individual who Shaul pointedly called out over his overt sexual sin in his letter to the assemblies in Corinth (1 Cor. 5:1).

 

So what we discover as we proceed through the apostle’s “rhetorical” diatribe in this passage, which he boldly levels at an impious class of Jews (or I much prefer to describe them as “religious Jews”), is not a diatribe, nor criticism, nor attack against all Jews or against Judaism as some would claim. For we will clearly see as we go along here that the apostle is in no way expressing, nor is he promoting any anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic doctrine, which unfortunately, organized denominational religion has interpreted this and other similar Pauline passages to mean.

 

And I suspect that much to the disagreement of some, we will find later on in our discussions on this chapter, that Shaul actually reveals his love for his Jewish kinsmen as well as he certifies the virtues of the “pious” (covenant-keeping and walking) Jew of his day. You see, it is evident that Shaul loved his Jewish brethren. Evidence of his affinity towards his Jewish kinsmen is recorded later on in this very letter:

 

“I am speaking the truth–as one who belongs to the Messiah, I do not lie, and also bearing witness is my conscience, governed by the Ruach HaKodesh: my grief is so great, the pain in my heart so constant, that I could wish myself actually under God’s curse and separated from the Messiah, if it would help my brothers, my own flesh and blood, the people of Israe’el! They were made God’s children, the Sh’khinah has been with them, the covenants are theirs, likewise the giving of the Torah, the Temple service and the promises; the Patriarchs are theirs; and from them, as far as his physical descent is concerned, came the Messiah, who is over all. Praised be ADONAI for ever! Amen” (Rom. 9:1-5; CJB).

 

Friend: Can you sense here the immense internal struggle that was obviously going on within the apostle over the spiritual plight of his Jewish brethren? You see, when we factor in passages such as this one here, into an overall discussion of our focus passage, it should have the effect of putting the whole question of the Jew, especially the “religious Jew” of Shaul’s day, into a proper perspective, such that we can better understand what it was the apostle was trying to convey to his Roman readers. It obviously erases from any forethought going into our discussion that Shaul was some kind of spiritual “turn-coat” to his Jewish brethren. For the reality of the matter stands that the great apostle to the Gentiles was in no way anti-Jewish nor anti-Torah, but instead, honored them both to the point of being willing to forfeit his favored status with YHVH in exchange for their acceptance of the Messiahship of Yeshua and the Gospel that he and His Master preached and taught.

 

Need

As with most issues and topics that the apostle addresses throughout the body of his writings, Shaul’s diatribe against the rhetorical, religious Jew, carries with it tremendous spiritual application that few are willing to consider and act upon. What do I mean? Well, despite Shaul’s rhetoric being leveled against the “religious Jew” here in this passage, the sentiment–the meat–the overwhelming indictment put forth by Shaul against the “religious Jew”” by default and extension, sheds a revealing light upon any so-called “religious person.”

And what I mean specifically by “religious person” is one who identifies themselves as a member of a particular “religion,” who sits in judgment of those who are not a part of their particular religion; who they themselves do not follow the tenets–the rulings–the precepts–the traditions of their religion the way they’re supposed to. These are those that even seek to draw others into their way of life for the intended purpose of making their newly converted disciple just like them. And their reward consists of their reputation and influence within their chosen religious organization being bolstered. Furthermore, these make up their own rules and practices in and around their denomination’s teachings, rules and traditions, choosing only those elements–tenets–rules–laws to follow that best suits them and that don’t infringe upon their personal lives. They themselves and as an organization are the focus of their religion, not their ideological version of “god.” It’s all about them. Thus, they end up placing their eternal destinies upon their “religiosity” and denominational “affiliation,” not upon their relationship with their version of god.

And this is exactly what the apostle was addressing in his diatribe against the “religious Jew.” And this diatribe in particular serves as a reflection of the “religious…….(Jew; Christian; Messianic; Catholic)”: YOU FILL IN THE BLANK.

 

Satisfaction

 

As with every post in this series, we seek to put contextual, historic, linguistic, cultural and even spiritual perspective and meat on some of the apostle’s most difficult and hard to interpret writings.

But in this discussion today, I want in particular to ignite a flame of personal and even spiritual introspection in all of us. For my hope, trust and prayer here today is that we will be able to identify the areas in our walk with Mashiyach where we are falling short, and maybe reflecting the very traits that Shaul’s rhetorical, religious Jew of his day, was widely known to portray.

And the reason why this exercise is even important to the Truth-seeking, covenant-walking elect of Yah is for purposes of, not just recognizing the shortcomings of our relationship with the Almighty–that being “if the shoe fits, where it” sort of thing. But more importantly, “if the shoe does fit” and that shoe is not proper and or needs fixing, then by all means, get that thing–that issue–that sin–that damaged relationship corrected before it’s too late–before we end up having to face penalties and condemnation because of our refusal to fulfill our part of the covenant with the Eternal that we agreed to adopt and walk in as His elect; as His child; as His set-apart one.

We have been called by our Master to holiness and to walk uprightly–perfectly before our Father. For He proclaimed to His disciples, and by extension us today:

Be ye therefore perfect (in the Greek, “teleios,” meaning complete) even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Mat. 5:48).

In reality, the individual that our Master was describing here is the opposite of the would be religious Jew, Christian, Messianic, what have you. For their day-to-day walk is centered, not upon themselves, nor upon their denominations, but upon the Will and Ways of their Father in Heaven.

 

Visualization

Romans 2:17-18—You Are Called a Jew

 

So let’s get into this and see if we can come to terms with what the apostle had to say to the Roman Assembly of Messianic Believers on the question of their Jewishness; and then by extension, what he had to say as it relates to our individual and communal religiosity; our so-called profession of Faith and such.

 

Let’s first read for understanding our focus passage:

 

2:17-18: “Behold, thou art called (in the Greek “Eponomazo,” which in English means to be named or called or referred to) a Jew (Jewish here is in respect to that individual’s race, birth and or religion; not his spirituality), and makest thy boast (in the Greek “Kauchaomai,” meaning to glory on account of or to glory in a thing) of God and knoweth His will, and approvest (in the Greek “Dokimazo,” meaning to scrutinize as to determine a thing’s authenticity) the things that are more excellent (in the Greek “Diaphero,” which means in this context to distinguish between good and evil; lawful and unlawful), being instructed out of the law…”

 

So we find here in these 2-verses the beginning of the apostle’s diatribe which in a literary sense, represents an early sketch of what will ultimately be a painting, if you will, sort of a portrait of a class of Jew, that we’ve already named as simply the “religious Jew.” And he begins the sketching out of this rhetorical religious Jew by boldly stating or naming the theme of his diatribe:

 

You are named, called, or identified as a Jew.”

 

Interestingly, it’s not the apostle himself identifying this rhetorical class of religious individuals as a Jew. The title or name Jew in this particular sense is given to this rhetorical religious figure by his very own admission. And as we progress, we will see how this rhetorical figure defines what it means to be a Jew from their established perspective. In other words, the apostle in his sketching out of the portrait of the religious Jew states boldly at the outset (which is the whole basis of a diatribe–the boldness of the rhetoric) that you, religious Jew, identify yourself as a Jew.

 

The religious Jew’s view of himself is highly presumptive to say the least. In other words, this rhetorical figure’s self-professed identity of him being a Jew is based upon a mishmash of established and verifiable truths, as well as a lot of made-up stuff. And that’s why it’s so fitting that the apostle chose to use this literary method to paint a portrait of the religious Jew: to bring to the Roman Messianic’s spiritual table, as complete an understanding of what a religious Jew was truly about. And as always in his writings, Shaul simply wanted to put things into their proper perspectives, so as to not dilute the Truth of the gospel nor distract his readers’ focus on their walk in Mashiyach. It’s sort of akin to making sure one pays attention to all of the things of their Faith, while giving even greater attention to the weightier things of their Faith. In this particular sense: One’s Jewishness must be subordinated to one’s covenant relationship with the Eternal.

 

But getting back to our focus passage, Shaul recognized that the religious Jew presumed they were loved and favored of Yah simply by virtue of “their Jewishness.” By “their Jewishness,” I mean specifically the rhetorical Jew’s biology, heritage, culture and religious affiliation and practices. Their Jewishness, as we will clearly see, had absolutely nothing to do with their walking in covenant with the Almighty nor their obedience to the Will of YHVH. For sadly the criteria for one being a Jew had, at least by Shaul’s day, been reduced to superficial qualities and idealistic-even humanistic traits that had nothing to do with the spiritual qualities that Yah stated would identify one as a true Israelite. And of equal sadness, this diminished, idealistic understanding of what it meant to be a Jew had, by Shaul’s day, become the overriding basis of the Jew’s religion–that is, of Judaism. That is, in many respects, the religion defined what it meant to be a Jew. Yah’s instruction of what a true Israelite, or even a Jew, looks like–acts like–lives like was no longer the quintessential defining element in the religious Jew’s identification of himself.

 

Consequently, the religious Jew’s “Jewishness” had become the very thing that set them at variance or at odds with the rest of humanity. In fact, their Jewishness had become a thing that was working against their chosen, set-apart status. For their set-apart status identified them to be a people who would know Yah’s will having possession of Torah; thus they were able to discern between the holy and the profane, right and wrong; they were in many respects supposed to be Yah’s favored people above all the nation-peoples of the world.

 

But if we look a little closer here, we recognize that the apostle never credits this religious Jew with actually doing or walking in the very Thing that set them apart from the rest of humanity–which was their obedience and walking in Torah. Instead, the apostle only credits this religious Jew with having knowledge of Torah. In other words, the apostle is trying to show his Roman Messianic readers that many of his Jewish brethren, in a general course of speaking, were failing to live or walk out their Jewishness in a manner that was consistent with their Title of Israel; or in accordance with the Eternal’s identifying definition of Israelite or Jew.

 

As Yisraelites, YHVH was supposed to be inextricably attached to the nation’s entire being and purpose–as His title of El is inextricably attached to the latter half of the nation’s name–that is, Isra-EL. Thus, Yah’s identifying identification of the Israelite or the Jew was that they were to be a light to a blind world; priests to a world seeking to connect with their Creator; demonstrating in everything aspect of their existence, what Yah required of those who would be His children: that is being an example to the rest of the world what walking in covenant with the Creator of the Universe was supposed to look like.

 

Unfortunately, Judah had shed and forfeited much of her Yishrael traits and purpose, choosing instead to be something that YHVH never intended for them to be. Thus, religious Judah set her own path and laws; Judah became the focus, not Yah. Yet religious Judah continued to perpetrate a fraud upon the Gentile world, insisting they were indeed Yah’s chosen ones who were doing the Creator’s Will because only they, by virtue of their possessing Torah and by virtue of their Jewishness, knew Yah’s Will. But their doing of Yah’s Will was based upon a warped and manipulated understanding of Yah’s Will that was heavily influenced by their stiffnecked ways and manner; their greed; their lusts; their arrogance; their self-righteousness and self-centeredness; their bigotry; and one could go on.

 

Consequently, we know that the religious Jew of Shaul’s day, and we’ll see this played out and verified a little later on in this discussion, had deluded themselves into thinking they had arrived simply by virtue of their Jewishness. They believed they were destined for the “olam haba” (that is paradise or the world to come) simply by virtue of their Jewishness, while the rest of humanity–the non-Jew that is–was destined for “gehinnom” (that is the Jewish concept of hell). To the religious Jew of Shaul’s day, if you were Jewish, you were “in” with God. But if you were not a Jew, then you were naturally “out” with God.

 

In many respects, the term, or for that matter the title Jew, is inextricably linked to our Faith walk. And that inextricable linkage to our Faith Walk is not made in the most flattering of light, if you catch my drift. Instead, those linkages are often made with an appreciable degree of disdain.

 

As we are often viewed by the ignorant as being Jewish or having converted to Judaism, more times than not, our Faith practices are viewed in a rather dim light by a great many unknowing Christians and even secularists, despite the fact that we are supposedly living in a tolerance-based “woke-society.” As far as modern day Jews are concerned, we are viewed by a great number of them as usurpers of their religion who have attached ourselves to Judaism for the sole purpose of replacing them as God’s chosen people in the eyes of the world.

 

I vividly recall a number of occasions when the question of my Faith would come up in conversation with individuals unfamiliar with the tenets of our Faith, when I mentioned for instance that I keep and honor the weekly Sabbath as opposed to the venerable day of the sun; or that I don’t keep Christmas or Easter or whatever, but instead keep the Feasts and set-apart days of YHVH as contained in the Torah, the immediate response by these unknowing souls was generally that of: “Oh, you’re Jewish.” Or, “Oh, you’ve converted to Judaism.” And the response is typically flavored with a frown or a tone that betrays the questioner’s disapproval or disappointment of me and my profession of Faith.

 

I recall my family expressing their total disappointment in my coming into this beloved Faith of ours. They expressed in a great many words that I won’t bore you with here in this post, the sentiment that I had chosen to take up Judaism, which in their minds is in total opposition to my Baptist upbringing. And I would venture to suspect that a great amount of the negativity that many, such as those of my family, have towards us as it relates to our Faith, is derived from the false understanding of texts such as our focus text, much of their understanding being based upon their life-long anti-Semitism and aversion to Torah.

 

Now, I won’t mince words here on this subject. A great amount of the negativity that exists in the world towards the Jew and Judaism can biblically be traced back to impious and religious Israel herself. And we kind of get a sense of this from our focus passage here. For the religious Jew did not do his nation, nor his faith any favors by setting themselves apart from, and ideologically above, the nation-peoples of the world, while blatantly violating the tenets of their own professed Faith and the Torah. Their personal and corporate sin–their transgression of Torah, we will see later on in our discussion, led to their being separated from YHVH. In addition, their incessant professions that they were exclusively Yah’s people, who knew the Will of Yah by virtue of their possession of Torah and their Jewishness, all while acting and behaving contrary to Yah’s definition of what it means to be an Israelite or Jew. This hypocrisy naturally led to the nation-peoples of the world seeing Israel and the Jew in a negative light, which ultimately led to the nations profaning and blaspheming the Name of Yah.

 

We’ll get into this particular issue of the Gentiles profaning and blaspheming the Name of YHVH in an upcoming discussion of this passage.

 

Now, none of what Shaul writes here in his diatribe against the religious Jew is to say that there weren’t Jews who didn’t walk in Torah as any one who belongs to Yah should. We learn that Zecharyah haCohen and his wife Elisheva (the parents of Yochanan the Immerser) were “both righteous and walked blamelessly in all the commandments and ordinances of YHVH” (Luk. 1:5-6; Rood).

 

Luke in his narrative here was in no way saying that Zecharyah and Elisheva were perfect and never sinned. What this is saying is that this couple was fastidious and focused in their keeping and in their walking out of Torah throughout their lives, such that no one could ever accuse them of overtly and intentionally violating Torah and its precepts and ordinances. Obviously, if they violated any portion of Torah, they would make the sanctioned and appropriate offering unto YHVH and resume their walk in Torah. And it has to be mentioned here, as it relates to Zecharyah and Elisheva, the exacting requirements of Torah were amplified for Levitical priests, who in addition to walking and keeping Torah without fault, were required to maintain a state of ritual purity at all times (so as to not inhibit their priestly responsibilities) and be a walking and talking example and source of Torah instruction for the average Israelite on the streets of Judea.

So there is a widely held and grossly erroneous misconception and teaching among many within and without our Faith community that blameless Torah keeping was and remains an impossibility. Such thinking implies that Yah’s commandments are too “grievous and impossible to obey” (Rood; CG, pg. 38).  But the reality of the matter is that one whose heart is pure and whose mind is steadfast upon Yah, and who desires to walk in covenant with Him can walk and keep Torah blamelessly. Does this mean that one will never falter or sin? No. It just means that one who is walking blamelessly in Torah has made a commitment not to walk or exist outside the framework of Torah in their lives. Their entire life is thus centered around and upon their relationship with the Eternal and the applicable Torah instructions.

 

You know, I find it ironic that no one finds it impossible to believe that there are those in this  nation who can be law abiding citizens who never cheat on their taxes, break traffic or criminal laws and who are just good neighbors and citizens, despite there being thousands upon thousands of local, municipal, state and federal laws on the books of this nation. In fact, in more cases than not, we know for a fact that such people do exist. But when the question of one being able to live Torah blamelessly comes up–keeping, let’s say all the applicable 613 commandments of Torah–the default reaction by many is that no one can live Torah without fault. But we can see here that such thinking is not true. The proper thinking on this matter must be framed in Truth and reality: One can live a life of Torah well and blamelessly, which most of the world has chosen not to do. Will such individuals who’ve committed to living and walking Torah blamelessly ever slip up and sin on occasion? Absolutely. But those slip ups are not the norm in such individuals’ lives. It is in fact the exception. And the achievement of that commitment is made all the more possible by the simple fact that our Heavenly Father has gifted us His precious Holy Spirit that empowers us to walk out Torah despite our living in a corrupt and darkened world. His Torah being inscribed onto the fleshly tablets of our hearts (Rom. 2:15; 2 Cor. 3:2; Jer. 31:33; Heb. 10:16), over time, through the sanctification process, compel us to abhor sin in all its manifestations and influences here on this earth, effectively making us dead to the tug–the lure of sin (Rom. 6), yet alive unto Yah through the atoning work of our Master Yahoshua Messiah (Rom. 6:11). Such individuals are compelled to keep Torah blamelessly because they want to please their Heavenly Father and because it is by spiritual and physical default the right thing to do.

What did Master say regarding the required degree of righteousness we must achieve if we are to enter the Kingdom of Yah? He said that our righteousness MUST exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees (Mat. 5:20). And the average soul who reads this will invariable default to interpreting one’s righteousness exceeding that of the Scribes and Pharisees as solely that of an imputed righteousness–righteousness that is bestowed upon us because of the atoning sacrifice and work of Yeshua Messiah. And indeed, the righteousness that is imputed unto us by our gracious Elohim factors heavily into the overall righteousness equation which is required of all who would be Yah’s elect. However, the righteousness that exceeds that of the Scribes and Pharisees also includes our intentional walking in covenant relationship with the Almighty which involves the Spirit and Truth keeping and walking in Torah and also teaching others to do so as well (Mat. 5:19). Yes, Yah indeed grants us His imputed righteousness upon our coming into covenant agreement with Him through the ministry of Yeshua Messiah. But we are required to then begin the process of dying to self (that is, giving ourselves entirely over to Yah) and allowing Yah’s imputed righteousness through the agency of the Ruach HaKodesh to do its thing in us. Which means we have to make the conscious decision to believe YHVH (that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek after Him), repent, stop sinning, draw nigh unto Him, learn of Him and His Ways, and be obedient to His instructions and commandments. Yah’s not going to do these things for us. Contrary to the religious grace-perversion lovers of this world, YHVH requires His elect to have skin in the game–to be participatory in the covenant agreement. A bilateral covenant agreement, which is the type of covenant that we who walk in the True Faith once delivered enter into, requires that each party fulfill their assigned portion of the bargain: In Yah’s case, He does the hard work of saving, redeeming and restoring us to right relationship with Him; while we on the other end are required to be faithful, to love Him and to be obedient to His instructions and commandments. Yah becomes the defacto boss in our lives while we become His faithful servants; His set-apart children.

 

So in our focus passage here today, we find Shaul not speaking about pious Jews like Zecharyah and Elisheva, but the religious Jew of his day who selectively walked out Torah (that is, picked and chose the Torah commandments that suited him), while at the same time, sat in arrogant judgment of the world around him, not from a true spiritual basis, but from the basis of his biology-his culture-his heritage.

 

Continuing on, Shaul writes:

 

[And you in being called a Jew] rest in the Law and boast about God…

 

In writing that the religious Jew was reliant upon (or rested in) the Law was likely a reference to Torah. However, we cannot completely rule out that he could have also been referring, in addition to the 5-Books of Moshe, to the whole of Tanakh as well as to certain portions of the Oral Law. (The Jew of Shaul’s day, as with many in modern Judaism today, saw all these elements as part and parcel of the Law.)

 

Contextually, when we view this verse from the perspective of the whole passage, we find that Shaul by the end of the passage circles back and extols the virtues or value of one’s Jewishness such as the Jew being entrusted of Yah to safeguard the Torah and associated worship and understanding of YHVH and His Ways.

 

In Shaul writing that the Jew “boasted in Yah,” it is conceivable and even likely that the apostle had in mind Jeremiah 9:24-25 where it is written:

 

“‘If people want to boast, they should boast about this: They should boast that they understand and know Me. They should boast that they know and understand that I, YHVH, act out of faithfulness, fairness, and justice in the earth and that I desire people to do these things, says YHVH.’ YHVH says, ‘Watch out! The time is soon coming when I will punish all those who are circumcised only in the flesh'” (NET).

 

Then there’s Micah 3:11 which reads:

 

The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: Yet will they lean upon YHVH and say ‘Is not YHVH among us? None evil can come upon us” (KJV).

 

In Shaul’s diatribe against the religious Jew, he calls out their cultural, biological and heritage-based reliance upon or association with Torah. In and of itself, the problem was not a general reliance upon Torah by the Jew that Shaul was arguing here. The problem instead was their reliance upon their culture, biology and heritage. There was no thought of covenant relationship nor steadfast obedience to Torah that anchored the religious Jew’s reliance to Torah.

The apostle’s disapproval of the religious Jew is revealed or betrayed by his use of the term “kauchaomai”–kow-khah’-om-ahee or “boast” in the KJV or “gloriest” in the ASV. For his particular use of this term is highly suggestive of a sense of entitlement that the religious Jew believed he possessed by virtue of his Jewishness. In other words, the religious Jew of the apostle’s diatribe here believed he had, in the words of Messianic Commentator and Teacher Tim Hegg, “private rights to God” by virtue that their God being the ‘God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’ and therefore not the God of the nations” (Romans Commentary; Torah Resource; pg. 50).

 

The Greek term “epanapauomai” {ep-an-ah-pow’-om-ahee} that is translated in English to be “rely” in the ESV and “restest” in the KJV refers to one being in a state or condition of repose or finding one’s well-being or inner security, rest, comfort or support in a thing (BDAG).

 

It must be completely understood here that contrary to established fundamentalist and orthodoxy conventional wisdom, that Shaul is in no way rejecting the role Torah plays in the life of a Jew or any person of Faith. It will become evident to us as we progress along the verses of our focus passage that Shaul’s negativity was not aimed at nor against Torah, but against the religious Jew’s reliance, boasting and possession of Torah which they’ve deluded themselves into believing, gives them complete favor with the Eternal; guarantees them admittance into the Kingdom and salvation from judgment.

 

Clearly Shaul would be familiar with the Almighty’s view of such a skewed understanding of Torah and one’s Jewishness when He, through the Prophet Jeremiah, wrote:

 

Let not a wise man boast of his wisdom, and let not the mighty man boast of his might; let not a rich man boast of his riches; but let him who boasts boast of this: That he understands and knows Me, that I am YHVH who exercises lovingkindness, justice and righteousness on earth; for I delight in these things…” (9:23-24).

 

Continuing on to verse 18, Shaul writes of the religious Jew:

 

…and knowest His [Yah’s] Will…

 

Here we find the apostle adds more to the details of his literary portrait of the religious Jew, rhetorically noting that the religious Jew emphatically held to an erroneous premise that he knew Yah’s Will, such that he could inherently discern the difference between the holy and the profane–good and evil–pure and defiled. This understanding comes to them only through their receiving of the Torah, the writings, the prophets and I would add their oral traditions. Another way of wording this is, they have all these gifts and or advantages over the other nation-peoples of the earth simply because the average Jew receives Torah instructions at various times of their lives.

 

Obviously, these benefits and gifts were sources of great pride to the Jew who could hearken back to Deuteronomy 4:8 where Moshe declared of the Hebrew:

 

And what nation is there so great that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this Torah, which I set before you this day?

 

Nehemiah 9:14: “Thou camest down also upon Mount Sinai, and spakest with them from heaven, and gavest them right judgments, and true laws, good statutes and commandments.”

 

Most impactive to me is the Psalm passage that addresses this source of Hebrew, and by default, Jewish pride in Torah:

 

He sheweth His word to Jacob, His statutes and His judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for His judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye YHVH” (Psa. 147:19-20).

 

It should be without the slightest question in any true set-apart, covenant-keeping, Truth-seeking disciple of Messiah’s mind that all of this is wonderful and absolutely an essential benefit of possessing Torah (I.e., the oracles of Yah). However, the Jew that Shaul describes here in his diatribe is not keeping the very thing that he takes pride in and rests or relies upon. And the apostle will expound upon the dangers associated with this dichotomy in succeeding verses. For it’s one thing–it’s a baseline-level way of looking at this thing which is to be proud of the fact that Yah gifted one’s people, and by default, gifted one His Torah. But it’s an entirely whole other level of understanding when that pride one has in his people having been gifted Torah now acts positively on that pride. In other words, that person then takes that Torah gift and walks it out; obeys it. Instead of the individual having pride in the cultural heritage of his peoples’ possession of Torah, his pride rests upon the Elohim who gave that Torah to them; more precisely, his pride rests upon his relationship with YHVH and that pride manifests in the keeping of that Torah. The religious Jew of Shaul’s diatribe, unfortunately, was really boasting upon his Jewishness and NOT upon the substantive relationship that he should have with the Creator of the Universe.

 

So Shaul inserts into his rhetoric of the religious Jew that the “religious Jew” feels  confident, by virtue of their Jewishness, that they did in fact know the Will of the Eternal (sort of an inherent knowing of the Will of Yah by virtue of his Jewishness: “Hey, I’m a Jew, of course I know the Will of Adonai.”

 

Gamaliel III is quoted as having either said or wrote, regarding the Jew knowing the Will of Yah:

 

Do His Will as if it were your will, so that He may do your will as if it was His will. Nullify your will before His Will, so that He may nullify the will of others before your will” (Perkei Avot 2.4).

 

Now, I agree with Messianic Commentator and Teacher Tim Hegg in his assessment that this saying attributed to Gamaliel is a good one. However, Shaul’s rhetoric against the religious Jew of his day was that this particular Jew simply assumed that he was privy to the divine Will of the Most High, again by virtue of his Jewishness. The problem in their flawed presumptive reasoning, of course, is that there was no presumed submission to the divine will of the Most High. The religious Jew’s assumption that they knew the Will of the Most High proved to be indicative of his “arrogance and pride” (ibid).

 

And finally:

 

…And approvest the things that are excellent, being instructed out of the Law.

 

 

The apostle’s use of the phrase “kai dokimazo ta diaphero,” or as the authorized versions read: “and approve the things that are essential” is better understood as: “and tell (or know) right from wrong” (NJB and NLT). And the logical reasoning for the Jew, be they pious or religious, knowing right from wrong is because they’d received Torah instruction throughout their lives (vs. 18). It was indeed a given that the average Jew of Shaul’s day, by virtue of their Jewish upbringing in most cases, was in most cases capable of distinguishing the difference between right and wrong; the pure from the impure; the holy from the profane. And of course, this ability to discern good from evil and so forth did not come about as a result of their Jewishness, but because they were exposed to Torah from their youth. Thus they were conditioned and trained in a great sense to recognize that which pleased Yah from that which did not please Yah. And this was indeed an important, real benefit of being a Jew.

 

The problem as Hegg describes it is that “religion” entered into the Torah equation through the Rabbinic system. Thus, the so-called sages began to interpret Torah from the perspective of their own individual preferences, inclinations, and perspectives that were not necessarily based upon Yah’s Holy Spirit revelation. This altering of understanding, from that of Yah’s perspective, to that of the sages’ or rabbis’ perspective was the basis for much of the apostle’s diatribe against the religious Jew as described here. The original, Yah derived meaning of much of Torah, as a result of Rabbinic tradition and law, “overshadowed the meaning of the text” or of Torah altogether (Hegg; pg. 50).

 

Action

And with that, we will bring this installment of TMTO to a close and pick up our discussion of Shaul’s diatribe against the religious Jew, Romans 2:19-20 in our next installment.

It is again my hope that you not simply focus on the Jewish aspect of Shaul’s diatribe here, but more so, consider the passage that we’ve examined here today from the perspective of our own “…ness;” our Messianic-ness or our Christian-ness; whatever. Are the things–the traits–that Shaul puts forth in his rhetorical portrait of a religious Jew at all applicable to us as set-apart covenant-keeping, Yeshua-focused Torah-keeping children of the Most High?

Are we by chance Messianics in name only, such as suggested of religious Jew here in this discussion–Jews by name or by biology-heritage-culture–only? Where is the level of relationship with the Most High that is factored into our claim to the Name that we hold on to so dearly?

Do we put our eternal destiny into our Torah-keeping or into something more in line with Yah’s purpose for His human creation–like placing or basing our eternal destiny on our relationship with the Most High through Yeshua Messiah and upon our Faith in that overall relationship?

Do we know Yah’s Will for His human creation and for our individual lives. Are we read-up and studied-up on Yah’s Torah such that we know what “Thus saith YHVH our Elohim?” Do we hunger and thirst after righteousness and upon being fed and filled with His Word, go forth and walk out that which we’ve received in faith and in Spirit and Truth? Or do we simply rest upon a false hope of religion that tells us that we are guaranteed salvation–eternal life–simply by saying the sinner’s prayer, getting dunked in a make-shift baptismal pool, and throwing a few duckets into the offering plate from time to time?

Are we by chance a reflection of Shaul’s religious Jew, or are we sold out, died in the wool, hardcore, obedient Messianics who love our Elohim with our whole being as well as our brethren of Faith and who refuse to take our Faith profession for granted.

So I simply leave you with a spiritual assignment in anticipation of our next installment to this series within a series: Conduct a serious self-assessment of who you identify yourself as and whether or not you rest your eternal destination upon the elements of religion and denomination, or upon a true, obedient and substantive covenant relationship with the Almighty.

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

  My Torah Portion Observation of the Week I was profoundly moved by the section of this week’s Torah portion that recorded what on the surface seemed the very harsh and violent encounter we had with YHVH. It was Parashah 26: Sh’mini, Eight and I wish to briefly...

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

Select Your Passover Lamb

I'm Reminded I’m reminded when looking over our copy of the Hebrew Observational Calendar that today is the day that we would select the unblemished animal of the first-year that would serve as our paschal lamb. Choosing a Lamb Today Certainly, today, the vast...

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me..." (The Apostle Paul to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers) Well, I’m going to take a slight break from our series on the plurality of the Godhead series to tackle one of the Apostle Paul’s many difficult passages that the...

The Gospel According to the Apostle Paul

Our New Challenging Pauline Passage–Romans 2:16–A Seemingly Bold and Curt Statement From the Apostle. 

 

Our focus passage, or more precisely, our focus verse today is Romans 2:16. And we find when we read this verse a rather bold and seemingly curt statement from Paul. Knowing what we know about him, this what I call a seemingly bold and curt statement coming from the great apostle to the Gentiles, is not at all surprising nor mysterious. The phrase of interest in this verse is “…according to MY gospel.”

Indeed the man is renown for making what appears to our 21st century Western sensibilities to be arrogant and curt statements from time-to-time in his writings. Unfortunately, it tends to be somewhat difficult, at best, to ascertain whether or not Shaul was being arrogant, facetious, rude, angry, uncaring; exercising some form of tough-love; hard or harsh; or simply trying to get his point across on the issue at hand in a way that would grab his readers’ attention and prompt positive action on their part. And so trying to determine the why’s and what’s and wherefore’s of the apostle and his writings is the burden that we as students of the bible are forced to contend with on a frequent basis.

Consequently, this is, in great part, the reason for this Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

And don’t worry, we’ll certainly proffer a likely reason for the apostle’s use of the phrase “according to MY gospel” as we contextually unpack this passage.

How Must We Take Shaul’s Statement “According to MY Gospel?”

Now, depending upon one’s personal disposition or understanding of Shaul the man and Apostle, his naming the “Gospel” as “my gospel” can be taken any one of a number of ways: 

  1. The gospel that Shaul proclaimed and taught was specific to him and his commission as an apostle by Master Yahoshua. Thus the apostle took ownership of the good news that he was given by Yeshua HaMashiyach to preach and teach.  
  1. Shaul’s gospel was different from the gospel that was proclaimed and taught by Yeshua, Yochanan (John) the Immerser and Yeshua’s inner-core of disciples turned apostles. 
  1. The “Gospel” message was a monolith or a constant among all those who proclaimed it. However, that monolithic, constant “Gospel,” if you will, competed with or against other messages or gospels. And so the apostle was trying to articulate, in no uncertain terms, a separation of the Gospel that he and His Master taught from all the other gospels being peddled or surreptitiously infused into many of the Messianic Assemblies of the Greco-Roman world of Shaul’s day.  
  1. Shaul was a complex soul whose personality often came across in his writings as someone who may have been arrogant and ambitious. Or maybe, this claiming of the gospel as “my gospel” on the part of the Apostle was simply his blunt way of asserting himself as his readers’ sanctioned overseer.

 We Can’t Always Tell What the Apostle Meant

We cannot be fully certain as to what the apostle meant by calling the gospel “my gospel.”  

As 21st century readers of the apostle’s letters, we are always at a significant disadvantage. We can, with somewhat ease, ascertain in most cases that Shaul was addressing or reacting to specific influential issues and events transpiring within and around the assemblies he oversaw. However, we 21st century western readers are often not privy to the specifics of those events and issues. Shaul knew his readers; his readers knew him; and both he and his readers knew of the particulars of those issues and events of which he was writing. Therefore, it would not be at all necessary, nor expected, that the apostle would waste valuable parchment space rehashing the particulars of those influential events and issues of which he was responding to in written form.

 Missing Information

So there’s a lot of relevant information that is left out of the apostle’s letters that would otherwise be most useful to our overall understanding of his writings and teachings.  

So this lack of important information that often stands in our way of having a clear understanding of what Shaul is writing about, especially in many of his hard to comprehend passages, is actually a good thing. It’s a good thing because it forces us to dig deeper into the apostle’s writings and even the whole of the bible in order that we may uncover some of those essential pearls of wisdom the apostle has become renown for.

 Why Are the Hard to Understand Pauline Passages Important For Us to Study? 

Why is it important or beneficial that we flesh out the meaning of such an obscure passage of the bible, especially after my making the statement that we may never be able to, with certainty, determine what the apostle meant  by such hard to understand phrase as the one we’re looking at today.

Next to Torah, the Gospel is the most important revelation of the Almighty to His human creation. For I contend that the Gospel was and is the framework by which the Torah was delivered to us in it’s fulfilled state through the example and teachings of our Master Yahoshua Messiah.

Yeshua’s Drop the Mic Statement

Of His ministry and of the Torah, Master gave the following “drop the mic” statement that the vast majority of self-professing orthodox, fundamental and evangelical Christians have tragically misrepresented and misunderstood for centuries:

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Last time I looked out the window, heaven and earth seem to still be in existence: neither has passed away to date. Continuing: Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (If Torah is something that believers in Yeshua Messiah are not supposed to keep, and folks are out there teaching and preaching this as a mainstay of their religion/church/what have you, are they not insinuating that Yeshua is a liar? Continuing:)  For I say unto you, that except your righteousnesses shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Mat. 5:17-20). 

Yeshua’s Commission to Proclaim the Gospel

Our Master had a number of commissions that His Father placed upon Him during His brief earthly ministry. And one of the least taught or talked about of those commissions was the Gospel: that is, the good news about His Father’s coming Kingdom here on earth. 

This gospel that Yeshua proclaimed and taught—this good news about the Kingdom of Heaven that was about to drop upon the doorstep of humanity—was in great part a fulfillment and a clarification of Torah. Among so many things, the Gospel revealed the nature and Person of our Father YHVH. It explained the workings of Yah’s government, especially as it pertained to Yah’s human creation. And it revealed Yah’s righteous judgments and condemnation that will come upon Yah’s disobedient human creation (I.e., Torah’s curses) and Yah’s glorious rewards and benefits to be lavished upon Yah’s called-out one: His elect (I.e., Torah’s blessings). 

So let’s now unpack our focus passage and allow scripture to interpret for us what Shaul meant by the phrase “my gospel?”

 The Focus Passage of Romans 2:16 in Context

 

But glory, honour, and peace to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile. For there is no respect of persons with God. For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law…in the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel (Romans 2:10-12, 16; KJV).

 

Contextual Analysis of Romans 2:16–Parenthetical Insertions 

Romans 2:13-15 is a parenthetical insertion into the body of Shaul’s letter to the Roman Assemblies.

 Parenthetical additions to the Greek texts of scripture were added to assist readers in their understanding of the previous verse(s) of that passage by long forgotten scribes and or translators. 

The problem I find with such parenthetical insertions is that they carry with them the potential of advancing the personal dogma of the translators. I personally see these parenthetical insertions as mini-commentaries that unnamed translators and or scribes added to bring a degree of clarity to the previous verse or verses. The form in which these clarifying comments or statements take are pretty much subjective. Interestingly, apart from just a very small number of English translations that are primarily headed by the KJV, the vast majority of English translations on the market have completely dropped the parentheses, making the statements and comments that were once enclosed in the parentheses appear as original portions of the passage. In other words, these inserted statements or comments have over the centuries, for the most part, are today viewed as inspired scripture by virtue of the various English translators and editors purposely leaving out the parentheses. 

There’s a ton of stuff going on in this content-rich chapter and the parenthetical statements of verses 13-15 only serve to muddy the waters of understanding. 

 Teasing Out the Elements of Romans 2:16 

So one of the things I often do when examining such challenging passages is to tease out the major elements of those passages. And we essentially find 2-primary elements to our focus passage: 

(A) A judgment that has already come or will come at some time in the future of the secrets of all people ; and 

(B) That judgment (whether it is a present judgment or a future judgment) is part and parcel of the gospel that Shaul names or identifies as “my gospel.” 

The Judgment Mentioned in 2:16 is Tied Contextually to the Previous 15-Verses 

Let’s first examine the “judgment” aspect of this verse. 

This judgment that Shaul writes about that is set to come upon humanity seems to be synonymous with the Day of Judgment that is described in Isaiah 13:5, 9; Joel 1:15; 2:1, 11, 31

Shaul makes mention of a “judging of the secret thoughts of people” (vs. 16). 

Now, I’ve made note throughout this series that Yah is a judge of hearts. In the Hebraic paradigm, the thoughts and or intentions of humans are directly linked to their hearts: that is, they are essentially synonymous. 

You see, when we bypass verses 13 through 15, and connect verse 12 to 16, we find the apostle does in fact make a cogent and complete statement on the issue of this impending judgment. If we add verses 13-15 (I.e., the parenthetical statements) to 12 and 16, the apostle’s line of thinking regarding this impending judgment is greatly diminished and muddied. 

The JFB (Jamieson-Faucett-Brown Commentary confirms my contention here by noting that “In the day” is the unfinished statement of Romans 2:12, the thought of which is resumed and then brought to a close. 

And what we ultimately have here in this verse is the apostle asserting that the gospel he preached and taught contains or addresses this judgment of the secret thoughts of all humanity.

God’s Coming Judgment was Part and Parcel of Paul’s Gospel

The issue of “judgment” is not the focus of our post here today. And the only reason we’re even discussing it is because the apostle made the emphatic statement that this impending judgment of the hearts of people is tied to his gospel. 

So we know at the outset of our examination of Shaul’s gospel that a big part or element of it is judgment.

 The Competing Gospels of Paul’s Day

Now, the thing we must not overlook here is that the gospel that was given to Shaul by the glorified Yeshua, competed with a number of pseudo-gospels that were being preached and taught (openly and in secret) by various and sundry entities: 

  1. The burgeoning and nascent Gnostics and Jewish mysticism (early forerunners of Kabballah). (Recall that Shaul had run-ins with these folks and their false teachings during his time in Ephesus.) The Gnostics and Jewish mystics were renown for twisting the content of scripture and syncretizing it with Greek and Roman mythology. 
  1. The orthodox Messianic Jews (popularly referred to in Christian circles as Judaizers) putting forth a gospel that required all who came in to the true Faith conform to Judaistic legalism and traditions (e.g., circumcision).

 Shaul’s Gospel in a number of respects is often referred to as the Gospel of Christ (otherwise referred to as the “Gospel about Christ (2 Cor. 10:14) [Christou as the objective genetive makes “with the gospel about Christ” a more accurate rendering]. According to Shaul, this Gospel about Christ (I.e., Messiah) was not known nor understood by the lost of this world because hasatan has blinded the minds of the unbelieving souls of this world (2 Cor. 4:1-5).  Nevertheless, as word of Yeshua and His teachings and sacrifice spread throughout the Roman Empire, his notoriety became infused into a number of competing belief systems that mixed a little bit of facts about our Master and His ministry, with a great deal more Greek and Roman-based philosophy and mythology. We see evidence of this today in the so-called Nag Hammadi scriptures or Gnostic Gospels that are believed to have formed the basis of Gnostic Christianity.

 The Competing Gnostic Gospel

Now, we previously addressed some of the false teachings and works of the gnostics in our series within a series that dealt with Shaul’s treatment and view of women in ministry. In that series, if you recall, we spent quite a bit of time discussing the influences the Gnostics and their gospels had on the Ephesian assemblies . And we learned that Shaul referred to those purveyors of such false teachings within the Ephesian assemblies as “those that trouble you and pervert the gospel of Christ” (Gal. 1:7); as well as “those that disturb you and seek to distort the gospel of Messiah” (Gal. 1:7).

 The Competing Legalistic Gospel

 The other prominent teaching that competed with Shaul’s gospel, which I’ve classified as “a gospel,” is that which was formed or created around Jewish legalism—the oral traditions and laws. This false gospel in many respects kept some of the truths about Yeshua and his earthly ministry intact, but added to it the requirement that any who sought entry into the Way Movement or the True Faith once delivered, were required to convert to Judaism and keep many of its oral traditions and laws. And the thought behind this false gospel goes right back to the erroneous belief that one’s Jewishness bought them salvation and entry into the Kingdom of God.

 Paul Versus the Perveyors of Competing Gospels

 In Shaul’s mind and in accordance with the gospel that he taught and preached, those who would enter the assemblies he oversaw and teach these contrary gospels to his readers, the apostle instructed that they be condemned—in the KJV, “accursed.” Recall also that we briefly touched upon the concept of curses—that biblically-based curses hold power that is aligned with YHVH’s direct intervention and judgment (Gal. 1:8; ). And it is within this context of competing gospels that Shaul reiterates that his gospel came to him via revelation from Yeshua HaMashiyach (Gal. 1:11-12) and that he had not received his gospel from any man. In other words, these erroneous, competing gospels were manmade gospels. And those that would attempt to bring these manmade teachings into the assemblies of Messiah would be condemned. The only Yah-sanctioned teaching or gospel was that which he had brought them. 

We’ll touch upon this a little more in just a moment. 

Comparing and Contrasting Yeshua’s Gospel with Paul’s Gospel 

Shaul uses the phrase “according to my gospel” in several other places in his writings that include Romans 16:25; 2 Timothy 2:8; cf. 2 Corinthians 4:3; 1 Thessalonians 1:5; 2 Thessalonians 2:14

Was Paul’s Gospel different from the Gospel that Yeshua, John the Immerser and the other 11 Apostles proclaimed and taught? 

The Gospel that Paul claimed as his own was essentially the same gospel that his Master Yeshua taught, but from a slightly different angle. (And I’ll talk more on this in my summary.) 

Shaul’s gospel was one that proclaimed salvation had come to humanity—all of humanity in fact. Not just to the Jew, although because of the covenant that YHVH had established with Avraham and his seed. The gospel would be offered to the Jew first—but salvation was available to all who would seek to have a true and substantive relationship with the Creator of the Universe and be grafted in to the commonwealth—the promises—given to Yisrael by the Eternal. 

Messianic Commentator Tim Hegg of torahresource.com points out that Shaul’s gospel features a singular salvation for both Jew and Gentile alike. There is no two-ways to Elohim as some have erroneously postulated over the centuries. Thus, Shaul’s gospel introduced a unified salvation as well as a unified judgment that will befall both classes of people. The standard by which this judgment will be based is Torah. And this was alluded to by the apostle earlier on in this same 2nd chapter when he wrote: 

“For all who have sinned without the Torah will also perish without the Torah; and all who have sinned under the Torah will be judged by the Torah” (2:12).

 Specifics of Paul’s Gospel Message

Scripturally speaking, what does Shaul’s Gospel consist of or what does it look like? Well, Shaul believed that he had been entrusted with this sacred thing—this gospel (1 Timothy 1:11) that he boldly named as “my gospel.” And clearly the apostle believed wholeheartedly that this gospel was not something created or made up by any human, but was something that was passed down to him by His Master Yeshua Messiah and he, Shaul, was specifically commissioned to deliver it to the nation-peoples of the 1st-century Greco-Roman world (Galatians 1:11-12; Acts 20:24; Romans 1:1). And Shaul was emphatic in the belief that Yeshua Himself passed down to him this gospel that formed the foundation of his evangelistic ministry. This central truth of the origin of his gospel coming from the glorified Yeshua Himself legitimized, not only his teachings and writings, but also his authority as a bonafide, Yeshua-commissioned apostle of the first order. 

Digging deeper, we find that Shaul’s gospel was one of God’s grace being made available to the whole of Yah’s human creation through the work of Yeshua Messiah, not just to those of Jewish descent (Acts 20:24b; Romans 1:9)

We also learn from Shaul that his gospel reveals a central truth that the Creator of the Universe has appointed His risen and glorified Son, Yeshua Messiah, to be the righteous judge of the quick and the dead (Acts 10:42; 17:31). And every work and every secret thing, be it good or evil, will be revealed and judged accordingly by Him (Ecclessiastes 12:14; 2 Timothy 2:8). 

Shaul’s gospel asserts that Yeshua was raised from the dead. And His resurrection foreshadowed the resurrection that every true Child of Yah who falls asleep (that is, who enters into physical death) prior to Yeshua’s return, will experience (2 Timothy 2:8). Thus the resurrection of the dead in Messiah factors greatly into Shaul’s gospel. 

Despite Shaul being raised an orthodox Jew and having received extensive training as a Rabbi, we find that Jewish Legalism found no home in his gospel as it served only to diminish the intrinsic power of the gospel message, divide the body and detract from the grace that the Creator has lavished upon His human creation (Acts. 15). 

Most importantly, we find that Shaul’s gospel carried with it the power to save any who would believe in the atoning work and ministry of Yeshua Messiah (Romans 1:16; I Cor. 15:2). Thus, a highlight of Shaul’s gospel was the foundational truth that Yeshua Messiah died for sins the humanity. He was buried and resurrected by His Father 3-days later (1 Cor. 15:3-4). In like manner, the dead in Messiah will be resurrected when Yeshua returns (1 Cor. 15:13-23). 

Shaul’s gospel spanned the history of his people. For his gospel was founded upon Torah which he lamented, not all his people obeyed (Romans 10:16). The burden of teaching and preaching the gospel that Shaul received by virtue of his apostleship brought with it a spiritual fatherhood over his readers (1 Corinthians 4:15). Consequently, the administration of the gospel was Shaul’s full-time occupation. He believed, in accordance with Torah, it was more than fitting for a worker of the gospel to receive financial and or material support from the flock they served; reminiscent of the Levitical Priests of old who were not given an inheritance by YHVH, but received their sustenance and support from the tithes, offerings and gifts of the people (Num. 18:20-24; Deuteronomy 25:4; 1 Timothy 5:18; 1 Corinthians 9:9-14). 

Lastly, Shaul’s gospel was “gentile-focused” (in many respects) as well as it was “anti-legalistic” as we previously discussed (Gal. 2:1-7). The apostle shared the framework of his gospel ministry with the Jerusalem Council who–seeing the results of Shaul’s work bolstered by Kefa’s (Peter’s) testimony that the Gentiles were indeed being called into an obedience of Faith as evidenced by their receiving the gift of the Ruach HaKodesh upon those entering into covenant with YHVH through faith in Yeshua Messiah—the Council placed no restraints upon Shaul and his evangelitic team’s work. Ultimately, this favorable agreement between Shaul and the Jerusalem Council led to Shaul and his partner Barnabas receiving from the council the right-hand of fellowship and an official endorsement of their ministry to the Gentiles (I Cor. 15:6-14; Act. 15).

Yeshua’s Gospel Make-Up 

On the other hand, the Gospel that Yeshua brought and taught was quite simply that of His Father’s Kingdom was at hand—it was imminent—and in many respects, it was in their midst. Consequently it fell upon His Palestinian brethren to repent and believe this good news about the Kingdom of Yah. It was not a gospel of Himself, per se, although the gospel that He brought and taught was based in great part upon His role in the renewed covenant and the great work of redemption that would take place because of His ministry. But all in all, Yeshua’s gospel was that of the good news about the Kingdom of Yah coming to the earth. In His proclaiming and teaching of the gospel given to Him by His Father, Yeshua was essentially proclaiming and declaring that His Father was getting the band back together again. That which was once a foregone reality—such that the Kingdom of Yah that was once present in the Garden and then in much lesser form during the time the Tent of Meeting/Tabernacle and then the Temple were in operation, but because of the fall and then Yisrael’s transgressions and breaking of the covenant, these iterations of the Kingdom of Yah here on earth faded away—well, that which was once a foregone reality according to Yeshua’s gospel this time would not be halted nor stopped by humanity’s failures. The Kingdom of Yah that was imminently upon humanity could not be stopped. In fact, Yeshua’s gospel asserted that even the gates of hades would not be able to defend against it (Mat. 16:18). 

Yeshua prophesied that the gospel He preached and taught would be proclaimed to the entire world (that is, to all creatures) just before the end would come (Mat. 24:14; Mar. 13:10). Consequently, Yeshua’s gospel was a message that often ran afoul of the teachings and rulings of the Jewish leaders (I.e., the leaven of the Scribes and Pharisees) and the Herodian government (I.e., the leaven of Herod) of His day. It was a message of freedom and salvation that often got confused in the minds of Yeshua’s 1st century Palestinian audience who sought desperately to be freed from Rome’s brutal rule, which the Jewish conventional wisdom contended would be replaced by a Messianic government. Yeshua was seen by many early on during his proclaiming of the gospel as the one who would lead a successful revolt against Rome and install this Messianic Kingdom that would be headquartered in Yerushalayim. But to the disappointment of so many of Yeshua’s followers, their version of the Kingdom of God did not come to fruition. 

Indeed, the gospel of the Kingdom that Yeshua preached and taught did in fact include the establishment of a Messianic Kingdom that would consume, devour and replace all earthly kingdoms and free God’s people from the evil rule of men (Dan. 2:44; 7:14, 27; Rev. 11:15; 12:10). But the confusion surrounding the errant Jewish thinking of the coming Kingdom of Yah in Yeshua’s day seemed to be founded in its timing. The Kingdom depicted in Yeshua’s gospel was not that of this conquering Messianic Kingdom, but that which was not seen by the eyes of men; that dwelled within Yah’s people; that brought Yah’s people into covenant relationship with Himself through Torah-living. 

Indeed, the Kingdom of Yah that Yeshua’s gospel depicted, in every respect was spiritual and it had manifested in the midst of those who had eyes to see and ears to hear the good news. Consequently, this Gospel of the Kingdom  was accompanied by great power and miracles (Mat. 15:31; Luk. 7:22). It was a gospel  that provided the would-be citizen of Yah’s Kingdom freedom from the rule of religion and the evil in their lives, all in the here and now. It offered salvation from eternal damnation and a relationship with the Creator of the Universe. It offered healing and deliverance; light and Truth. It offered hope to the once lost and the forgotten of that ancient society. It was in all respects good news; joyous news. 

Indeed, Yeshua’s gospel can best be summed up by the Master Himself who, when called to read the Torah Portion/Reading for that particular Shabbat in which He had attended the synagogue in His childhood town of Nazareth, read only the first half of the Isaiah prophecy that foretold of Mashiyach and that which would form the basis of His Gospel (Luk. 4:18-21; Isaiah 61)

18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, 19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. 20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears. 

It should be mentioned, all that happened to Yeshua during His earthly ministry would be attached to the  Kingdom message in future tellings of the gospel message (Mat. 26:13; Mar. 14:9).

 A Personal Perspective on Paul’s Gospel in Comparison to Yeshua’s Gospel

So we have before us two versions of the Gospel: the Gospel that Yeshua preached and taught which was primarily the good news about the Kingdom of Yah; and the Gospel that Shaul preached and taught which was primarily the good news about Yeshua HaMashiyach. 

Here’s a way to look at Shaul’s gospel in light of Yeshua’s gospel:

It would appear that Shaul’s gospel was somewhat different from that of Yeshua’s gospel while at the same time, both gospels were one and the same. Yet when we look at both gospels side-by-side, we find each gospel to be somewhat nuanced and each served a unique purpose for a unique time to be delivered to a unique audience.

What do I mean? Well, starting with John the Immerser’s gospel, it served to prepare the pious Jews residing in Judea to receive Yeshua and the spiritual kingdom that would accompany Him. And the primary message was one of repentance for the Kingdom of Yah was at hand—to bring the people of the Land to a place of repentance whereby they’d be ready to shema their coming Messiah.

Then Yeshua’s gospel served to bring to the hearts and minds of the lost sheep of the House of Yisrael  to a place to receive, enter and live out the Kingdom of Yah that was in their midst, through the advent of the renewed covenant and Yah’s Plan of Salvation, Restoration and Redemption. Yeshua’s audience, being with rare exception, Jews who lived under the framework of Torah, would have known the rudimentary elements of living a life devoid of sin and walking in a covenant relationship with the Almighty. Granted, the vast majority of them may not have been walking in covenant with the Eternal at the time, but at the very least they had the basic knowledge of what walking in covenant with the Almighty should look like through Torah Living. The only thing that was missing from Yeshua’s audience was their coming in to a saving Faith in Yahoshua HaMashiyach and following Yeshua’s example of a fulfilled and clarified life of Torah-keeping, as opposed to living under the burden of the Oral Traditions and Laws of the Rabbis. Yeshua’s gospel involved  bringing Yah’s spiritual government and way of life to His people so that they would walk out Torah the way the Creator always intended His human creation to do so.

Shaul’s gospel served at least two purposes: (1) to wake the spiritually slumbering orthodox Jews from their life of dependency on their Jewishness (recall we discussed in the last 2-posts that the Jews of Shaul’s day placed their eternal destiny in their Jewishness which they believed provided them a free ticket to eternal life and entry into the Kingdom of Yah and the True Faith once delivered. And (2) to bring the Gentiles into an obedience of Faith through Yeshua Messiah. (Please refer to our discussion on what Shaul meant by the phrase “an obedience of Faith”–https://www.themessianictorahobserver.org/2020/06/24/obedience-versus-faith-paul-and-the-book-of-romans-series/). Shaul recognized right off the bat that any non-Jewish person coming to Faith would have little to no understanding of Torah and what walking in covenant with the Almighty looked like. And thus Shaul’s gospel was specifically tailored to both Jew and Goyim (I.e., Gentile) alike so that both would come to an obedience of Faith through Yeshua Messiah and the work of Ruach of HaKodesh operating within them. Regardless how you choose to view Shaul’s gospel, it involved a message and ministry that was specific to Shaul. And Shaul’s gospel in no way excluded nor contradicted the Gospel that Yeshua proclaimed and taught. They were in fact one and the same Gospel. It’s just that Shaul’s version of the gospel was nuanced in such a way as to address the unique station in life that the Goyim (I.e., the Gentiles) and the diaspora orthodox Jew of the apostle’s day found themselves as they entered into the True Faith once delivered.

Possible Reason For Paul’s Bluntness

So hopefully at this point, we are able to understand why Shaul was so blunt in his naming of the gospel: “my Gospel.” The apostle certainly took ownership of the gospel that was given to him by His Master Yeshua. And it goes without saying that the apostle had absolutely no patience for any who would come along and attempt to subvert it or displace it with a gospel that originated from the minds of mischievous men or from hasatan himself. His wording may come across as brash when filtered through our 21st century Western sensibilities, but it stands to reason that Shaul’s readers understood what the apostle meant by “my gospel” and they likely knew where he was coming from in making such a bold claim.

 What Paul Likely Meant by “According to MY Gospel” in Romans 2:16

So it stands to reason that Romans 2:16 is not indicative of Shaul being rude, conceited, arrogant or even drunk with power. It seems safe to conclude that the apostle was simply stating a critical fact to his Roman assembly readers that YHVH was going to judge the hearts of his human creation, be it they were of Jewish descent or Goyim (Gentile). All humanity would be judged justly. There was one standard for judgment for all. And just because some of his readers were Messianic Jews, they would not be immune to the coming judgment, in particular those who possessed Torah but refused to obey Torah. For Yah was no respecter of person. And this critical understanding of a coming judgment formed the basis of Shaul’s gospel message. His gospel message was different from the false manmande teachings and messages (or false gospels) that were being taught by unsavory men in some of the assemblies that he oversaw. For Shaul’s gospel came directly from His Master Yeshua Messiah. Thus, he and his ministry and his teachings were legitimate and endorsed by Yahoshua HaMashiyach. Shaul possessed ownership of the gospel he preached and taught because it was given to him personally by his Master, the glorified Yahoshua Messiah. 

So in every respect, Shaul could rightly name the Gospel and all that it contained: “According to my Gospel.”

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

  My Torah Portion Observation of the Week I was profoundly moved by the section of this week’s Torah portion that recorded what on the surface seemed the very harsh and violent encounter we had with YHVH. It was Parashah 26: Sh’mini, Eight and I wish to briefly...

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

Select Your Passover Lamb

I'm Reminded I’m reminded when looking over our copy of the Hebrew Observational Calendar that today is the day that we would select the unblemished animal of the first-year that would serve as our paschal lamb. Choosing a Lamb Today Certainly, today, the vast...

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me..." (The Apostle Paul to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers) Well, I’m going to take a slight break from our series on the plurality of the Godhead series to tackle one of the Apostle Paul’s many difficult passages that the...

Are You Under the Law? Part 4 of the Paul on Being Under the Law Series

A Culmination of the Previous 3-Installments 

Today’s discussion is a culmination of the previous 3-installments of this series within a series where we’ll finally answer the question: What did Paul mean by one who is under the Law as mentioned in Romans 6:14-15. And along with that, we’ll briefly touch upon the other 5 or 6 passages where the apostle uses the phrase “hupo nomos” or “under the Law.”

 A Quick Recap of Parts 1-3

 In installment 1 we addressed what Shaul meant by one who sins “with Torah” or “with the Law” (“en nomos”) being judged by Torah or the Law versus one who sins “without the Law” or “without Torah” being judged without Torah (Rom. 2:12). And we determined that Shaul was using this phrase to describe 2-classes of individuals who will experience Yah’s righteous judgment: (1) Those who possess or have knowledge of Torah will be judged within the framework of Torah. (2) Those who are ignorant of or who for whatever reason do not possess Torah (that is knowledge of Torah) will be judged outside the framework of Torah. And when we talk about being judged outside the framework of Torah, we’re talking about there being no excuse for rational people knowing or recognizing that Yah exists and He is sovereign: For evidence of His existence is seen throughout the whole of His creation. Not to mention, rational souls have the inherent capacity to recognize the difference between right and wrong. So when it comes time for judgment, they will have no excuse when they are made to give an account of how they lived and walked out their lives. 

In installment 2 we began our work-up towards defining what Shaul meant by the phrase “under the Law” by contextually discussing how Torah and Grace work hand-in-hand in the life of Yah’s covenant people and we dispelled any erroneous beliefs or teachings that Yah’s grace excludes the keeping and honoring of Torah by Yah’s people. 

Then in our last installment, Part 3, we discussed what it means, biblically, for Yah’s people to be sin conscious. And we went against the grain of the traditionalists-fundamentalists-orthodoxy, who see the concept of sin consciousness as one being enticed to sin because of their keeping of Yah’s Torah or when one takes assessment of the sin that exists in their lives. We concluded that true biblical sin consciousness is coming to terms and recognizing that which Yah loves and that which Yah hates. And that which Yah hates is of course sin.

 And it came to me this past weekend when I was reflecting on Part-3’s posting–still trying to come to terms with the thinking by orthodoxy and fundamentalists that sin consciousness is something to be avoided and tossed to the side in order to make room for their perverted version of grace–I recalled Yeshua emphasizing to those He healed or delivered during His earthly ministry that they sin no more. In other words, part and parcel of the Gospel message and ministry that Master brought to this world involved His emphasizing to those who would follow and be blessed by Him that they take on sin-consciousness and sin no more. And Yeshua told those he healed and delivered not to sin anymore because sin brings horrendous problems to every humans’ life. Sin is the root of all evils and misfortune in every person’s life, whether they choose to believe and accept this realization or not. If we resist hasatan’s temptations, James the Just certifies that he will flee from us (Jas. 4:7). In so doing, that is, resisting hasatan, we open the door for Yah’s wondrous grace and blessings and His Holy Spirit to operate and manifest in our lives.

 

Also within that last installment, we discussed the prophetic shadow pictures embedded in the Spring Feasts of Yah, which seemed to fit quite well into our series discussion on being “under the Law.”

 

So today, we want to simply bring our discussion on the subject of what it means for one to be “under the Law” to a much deserved end by contextually interpreting it within the framework of the things we discussed in the previous three-posts.

Need

So, in order for us to bring our understanding of what it means for one to be under the Law home, we must:

 

  1. Recognize and accept the role that Torah plays in the life of a Covenant-keeping disciple of Yeshua Messiah: Whereby Torah identifies or defines what sin is and the penalties that are associated with sin; in revealing that which Father approves of and that which Father does not approve of. Torah reveals the mark or standards that Father established for his human creation in order for them to have a true and substantive relationship with Him. And seeing that standard as being primarily unattainable for any who would be a child of Yah, Torah in effect points the child of Yah to Yeshua as the only means by which they may receive the opportunity for a true relationship with Him. Torah also highlights for all to see the penalties and condemnation that is associated with sin. And this whole concept of the penalties and condemnation that is associated with sin will factor heavily in our understanding of the phrase “under the Law.” 
  1. Sin came to humanity with a great cost associated with it. In other words, when Adam violated His Creator’s Torah–His instructions not to eat of the popularly labeled forbidden fruit–there was literally “hell to pay,” not just for Adam and Eve, but all of humanity–Adam and Eve’s seed. The debt or penalty and condemnation that sin brought upon Adam and Eve and their seed can be summed up as death: both physical and spiritual death that includes eternal separation from the Creator. This curse–the death penalty that comes upon every human being–is the fulfillment and reality of what YHVH warned Adam he’d face if He violated His instructions: 

“For in the day that thou eatest thereof (speaking of the forbidden fruit) thou shalt surely die” (Gen. 2:17; cf. 3:1).

 

And of course, many have noted and pointed out over the centuries that Adam didn’t fall over dead after eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. But the reality of this particular situation is, as Messianic Teacher Robert Bills pointed out in Part 1 of his teaching on the “Afterlife,” in the Eternal’s reckoning of time, Adam certainly died “within the day he ate the forbidden fruit.” That being said, we should all be familiar with 2 Peter 3:8 which reads:

 

“But beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”

 

And the next verse is very important to this central understanding of Yah’s people as well:

 

“The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Pet. 3:9).

 

Scripture records that Adam died 70-years shy of a single day in Yah’s [one-day is a 1,000-years–1,000-years is a day] reckoning of time. Thus the Creator didn’t lie or exaggerate as some might muse. For in order to round off this understanding of dying as a result of violating Yah’s Torah, the Apostle Shaul explained to his Roman readers in 6:23 the effect sin has on Yah’s human creation:

 

“For the wages of sin is death [physical and spiritual death]; but the gift of Yah is eternal life through Yeshua Messiah our Master.”

 

James, the half-brother of our Master, wrote concerning the same effect sin has on humanity:

 

“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which Yah hath promised to them that love Him. Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of Yah: for Yah cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth He any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of His own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death” (1:15).

 

So as far as sin is concerned–sin being the transgression of Torah (1 Joh. 3:4; 5:17)–it comes with penalties and condemnation (Rom. 6:23; Jas. 1:15)–unless one enters into covenant relationship with the Creator through the sacrificial ministry of Yeshua Messiah (Rom. 8:1). In other words, those who are in Messiah Yeshua are exempt from the eternal condemnation and penalties that is associated with sin. 

Now those of us who come into covenant relationship with the Eternal are not exempt from physical death: every soul who breaths air, regardless if they are a redeemed child of Yah or not, is subject to physical death. This death is part-and-parcel of the sinful human condition. Yah’s exemption from eternal-spiritual death, however, is a gift from Yah through Yeshua’s atoning sacrifice and ministry. The spiritual death man naturally experiences as a result of sin, which includes being separated from their Creator, is fixed (the breach is repaired) and he/she receives eternal life and is brought into covenant relationship with the Almighty. 

(Again, I would refer you to Messianic Teacher Robert Bills’ teaching entitled “The Afterlife” Parts 1 and 2 for an excellent foundational, biblically-based teaching on what happens to both the redeemed and unredeemed soul at death. We won’t go into that subject here today for obvious reasons–in other words, we’d be here for close to an eternity, knowing how verbose I can be.

 

Continuing:

 

  1. The penalties and condemnation that is incurred by humanity as a result of sin were nailed to the execution stake along with Yahoshua our Master (Col. 2:14). And as most of you no doubt know, orthodox and fundamentalists have used Colossians 2:14–that being the nailing of the handwriting of ordinances that was against us and which were contrary to us–the certificate of indebtedness–the record of debt that stood against us–as one of their anti-Torah proof passages. For these contend that Shaul, in this passage, is stating that Torah was nailed to the execution stake along with Yeshua. Why would YHVH nail Torah, the perfect Torah (Jas. 1:25); the holy Torah (Rom. 7:12), to the execution stake with Yeshua? I’ll tell you my opinion why: Because Torah in great part stands in opposition to orthodoxy’s and fundamentalists’ “grace” perversion doctrine. And because their grace doctrine is the most appealing thing to them and their followers because it affords them opportunities to live according to the way they desire. According to these, Torah’s got to go. For regardless what the fundamentalists and orthodox may say in opposition to the keeping of Torah by Yah’s people, they know deep down within their souls–recall that natural instinct every human has as it relates to Yah’s existence and the knowledge all rational folks have regarding the difference between right and wrong, that Torah serves to direct Yah’s people in the Way Yah requires them to go. And Yah’s Ways are not humankind’s ways: Yah’s ways tend to be diametrically opposite the ways of His Human creation. Yah, through His anointed prophet Isaiah stated as such: 

“…My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways…” (Isa. 55:8).

 

And of course, over the course of the last 3-parts of this series within a series–Paul on Being Under the Law–we discussed the extensive teaching of Shaul to his Roman readers regarding the manner in which Yah’s covenant–set-apart people are to walk and how they are to react to the lure of sin in their lives (ie., being dead to sin; new lumps of dough devoid of leaven; their abhorrence of sin; the everyday goal and purpose of imitating Yeshua in every way as He is the splitting image of His and our Father–He is the 2nd Adam–the model of who and what and how of any who would be a child of the Most High.

 

And lastly 4. When looking at the odd phrase “being under the Law,” knowing all that we’ve discussed on this subject, I pray that we have now begun to rationalize in our brains that the apostle’s use of the phrase has nothing to do with Torah-keeping by Yah’s covenant-set-apart people. For when we read the various passages in which “under the Law” (ie., hupo nomos) is used, it should become readily apparent to us that one is either “under grace” (hupo kharis) or “under the law” (hupo nomos) and that one cannot be under both. The term “hupo,” which in English is under, denotes being subject to the power of something or someone. And in this case, one is either under the power of the Law (ie., Torah) or under the power of Yah’s grace.

 

And I would ask that you refer back to Part 2 of this series within a series on Paul on Being Under the Law, in which we discussed the fundamental fact that Torah and grace were not mutually exclusive concepts. In fact, the exact opposite applies to grace and the Law. Grace and the Law work hand-in-hand in the redeemed, set-apart, covenant keeping Child of Yah’s life. So to erroneously think the apostle is contrasting and separating Yah’s elect who are Torah-honoring and Torah-keeping from those who are strictly under Yah’s grace and who do not keep Yah’s Torah is a catastrophic error. Any who go down that route of reasoning are sadly misled and are missing out on the True Gospel Message–the Gospel Message that Yeshua and His apostles taught. 

 

Satisfaction

When we lend a little focus on the term “hupo” or “under” and recognize that it is referring to one being subject to the power that a certain person, place or thing holds over one, then we are on our way towards understanding what the apostle meant by one being “under the law.” And also recall along with factoring in this understanding of one being subject to the power that a certain person, place or thing holds over one, that the apostle sprinkles within his writings on this subject the concept of one who is in covenant with the Eternal no longer being a slave to sin and sin no longer having dominion over them and their lives. 

And with all this in mind, we start to see emerge before us an understanding that those individuals who find themselves under the law are most likely the very ones whose lives are dominated by sin and who are slaves to sin. The whole idea that Shaul is talking about Yah’s people abandoning Torah because of Yah’s grace, or because of the Church Triumphant’s perverted understanding of grace, should now start to be doubtful in our minds. 

So let’s finally pull the sheets or covers off of “under the Law” phrase and see what the apostle really meant by the phrase in each of the 6-passages that it is mentioned.

 

Roman 6:14-15

 

“For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace. What then? Should we sin because we are not under law but under grace? By no means” (ESV)!

 

The context of Shaul’s phrase “under the law” statement here and in the other 5 or so passages where it is written, is that sin ruled over the lives of humanity. Torah comes along and condemns not just sin but also the sinner. The power that sin has over humanity is that it not only causes people to transgress Yah’s instructions in righteousness, but more so, sin leads to condemnation and penalties, the primary penalty being death—both physical and spiritual-eternal death. And Torah calls this reality out.

Nevertheless, it should be understood by now from our studies that Shaul is not forcing a conflict between Torah and grace. On the contrary, Shaul attempts to highlight for his Roman readers the reality of their calling in Yeshua Messiah. And that reality was that they (and by extension us today) are no longer (better, should no longer be) slaves to sin, but rather they were now made alive unto Yah.

 

Thus, the penalty that Torah levels at Yah’s human creation, just and righteous as Torah is, was placed upon Yahoshua. Therefore, the would be Child of the Most High is no longer under Torah’s condemnation. And just to reiterate, that condemnation is death. Therefore, because of the vicarious sacrifice of our Master Yeshua, forgiveness and imputed grace have displaced the condemnation that every human would have to face. In other words, the debt that was leveled against us because of sin, was paid in full by the ministry of our Master Yahoshua.

 

This being all said, Shaul was by no means saying that Torah had been done away with, even for Yah’s elect. Nor was he saying Torah was replaced or superseded by grace. Such an erroneous interpretation of the phrase “you are no longer under the law but under grace,” cannot stand when interpreted within its proper context.

 

Thus, here in this and other similar Pauline passages where the phrase is used, “Hupo nomon” (that is under law) is contrasted with that of “hupo karin” (that being under grace). So then, we should be able to conclude that Shaul’s focus is not on Torah or Torah-keeping by Yah’s people. Instead, Shaul seems to be focused on Torah’s condemnation of sinners. And so, Yah’s undeserved/unmerited favor (that being Yah’s grace) is opposite to Yah’s condemnation or Yah’s disfavor.

 

Now, this is all confirmed in 8:1 where the apostle writes to his same Roman Assembly members:”

 

“There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Mashiyach Yeshua” (ESV).

 

Shaul is teaching the Romans that they’ve been freed from condemnation, but are now recipient’s of Yah’s grace (that is, Yah’s unmerited favor).

 

What’s more, Shaul here was in great part dismissing any idea on the part of the Roman Jews of the assembly, that their labouring in Torah (that is, their circumcision and their obedience to Jewish traditions and laws) would be viewed as righteousness before their holy Creator. Recall from previous discussions that a common misperception and misunderstanding on the part of orthodox Jews and not so few Messianic Jews, was that they were automatically deemed righteous by the Almighty and would receive eternal life simply by virtue of their Jewishness and their lineage having been entrusted with the oracles of Yah. So Shaul was, among other things, dispelling this destructive myth, which was apparently creating so much division and confusion within and without the mixed assemblies of Rome. 

We are compelled to answer 2-questions here:

 

(1) Who are those that are under the Law; and

 

(2) Who are those that are under grace? 

We are compelled to conclude at this point of our discussion that those who have not received forgiveness of their sins through their receiving of the  gospel message and who have not entered into a set-apart, covenant relationship with the Almighty facilitated by the work of Yeshua HaMashiyach, would be “hupo nomon” (aka under law). For we’ve already established that the unsaved soul is subject to Torah’s penalties and condemnation. Rejection of and disobedience to Torah is sin:

 

“For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of Yah (that is, that which is born of grace) is eternal life through Mashiyach Yahoshua” (1 John 3:23).

 

Conversely, those who are converted and have their sins forgiven and who have entered into covenant relationship with the Almighty are “under grace” (aka hupo charin). The way it’s supposed to work is that those who are “hupo charin” (that is, under grace) are no longer subject or slaves to sin. In fact, Yahoshua has become the converted ones’ Master.

 

The Ruach HaKodesh is also given to the one who is “under grace” for the purpose, among so many other purposes, of convicting and compelling him or her to obey Yah’s commandments. When the true redeemed of Yah do falter and sin, they are not severely punished because they have the wherewithal and means to receive immediate forgiveness simply by confessing their sins and turning from their wicked ways. It cannot be overlooked, however, that the ‘under grace” status the redeemed ones of Yah enjoys is not a license to sin. Shaul confirms this himself in verse 15 of our focus passage:

 

“What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law (I.e., under Torah’s strict condemnation and penalties for sin) but under grace? Absolutely not” (NLT).

 

 

David H. Stern, translator of the popular Complete Jewish Bible and its companion book, “The Jewish New Testament Commentary,” suggests the apostle is actually focusing on legalism (legalism being Rabbinic Jewish traditions and laws that are in addition to Torah). His reasoning for such thinking is that the word twice translated “under” or “‘upo” means “controlled by” or “in subjection to.'” In other words, Stern is suggesting that the Messianic Jews of the Roman Assemblies advocated that any who would come into the true Faith once delivered and be saved would be required to conform and walk-out certain Rabbinic traditions and laws (eg., circumcision), whether you were a goyim convert or a Messianic Jew. But according to Stern, Shaul is pushing back on this disastrous line of thinking (remember we spoke on this earlier in this discussion) as some of the Roman Messianic Jews, like their orthodox brethren, were relying exclusively on their Jewishness for their salvation. Thus Stern’s understanding of one being under the law/Torah is the Rabbinic, legalistic line of thinking that stands in utter opposition to being under grace. 

Indeed, I agree with Stern’s general line of thinking as it relates to the fallacies associated with legalistic-based salvation. I do differ from him in that I don’t get the sense that the apostle was renaming or re-branding legalistic-based salvation with the phrase or notion of one being “under the Law/Torah.” The context simply doesn’t support this line of thinking in my mind. 

 

Now, another well known Messianic thinker and commentator, J.K. McKee (author of “The New Testament Validates Torah”) goes on to assert that being “under the law” appears to be more directly tied to the question of Yah’s elect being potentially “subject to Torah’s condemnation and penalties upon Law breakers.” And McKee uses the contrast of being “under grace” as his support for this contention. And he goes on to assert that being subject to Torah’s condemnation and penalties upon Law breakers better supports the “locational nature of the preposition ‘hupo’.” McKee asserts that this definition of being “under the law” in contrast with being “under grace” is more suitable. 

Now, I will give Stern credit  and acknowledge that he hasn’t entirely gone off the rails of this track to understanding what it means to be under the Law. For he makes it clear that Shaul’s use of “upo nomon” does not denote being “subject to the legal parts of Torah.” This, according to Stern, is simply because the legal portions of Torah were not, contrary to Christian conventional wisdom, done away with or in Stern’s eloquent way of stating it, “it is not abrogated by the Messiah’s coming” as stated by Master Himself in Matthew 5:17:

 

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill” (KJV).

 

 

But, again, I do not agree with Stern’s line of thinking that Shaul is referring to Rabbinic-legalistic-based salvation when he wrote that his Roman readers were not under the Law/Torah. And here’s my primary reason for disagreeing with this respected Messianic author and teacher. 

By taking the stance that Shaul was referring to Rabbinic-legalistic-based salvation when he wrote that his Roman readers were no longer under the Law/Torah but now under grace, Stern would appear to be legitimizing the Oral Torah/Law or Rabbinic Judaism as a Yah sanctioned wall around the Written Torah, or even an addition to the Yah’s Torah. The so-called Oral Law, as you no doubt realize, is a system of man-made laws and traditions that the sages contended would create a protective wall or fence around Yah’s written Torah. 

But legitimizing the Oral Tradition is fraught with problems. The greatest problem associated with legitimizing the Oral Law is that the Oral Law is a violation of Yah’s written Torah. For Yah was emphatic in his commandment that His people not add to or take away from His established Torah–the very Words that He rendered unto Moshe and the prophets and other inspired writers of the Tanakh. 

The Oral Law, either by itself or as part of a dual system of sacred writings, serves to diminish and pervert Torah. Essentially, it is by definition legalism. Stern is saying that Yeshua’s sacrifice did away with this perverted system. But the truth of the matter is that the legalism that Stern is referring to–that which is part and parcel of Rabbinic Judaism–was rejected by Father from the beginning, and the Apostolic record clearly shows that Yeshua and His disciples turned apostles railed against it and what it stood for. For according to Master:

 

“Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you (speaking to and of the Jewish leaders of His day), saying: “This people draweth nigh unto Me with their mouth, and honoureth Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me. But in vain they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Mat. 15:7-9; KJV).

 

Stern continues on that Yah’s people are to live “en nomos” or “within the framework of Torah” as mentioned in Romans 2:12, but they are not subject to or to be under subjection to legalism. Torah is an act of grace, just as Yah’s sending Yeshua to atone for our sins was an act of grace. That being said, Stern concludes that Yah’s elect have always been under both grace and Torah. But the “under Torah” that Stern references is a “gracious subjection” when contrasted with legalism, which Stern describes as a “harsh subjection.” 

Were his Roman readers under the constraints of Jewish legalism? Absolutely not. And with that in mind, I would agree with Stern that Yah’s covenant people are not subject to the elements of the Oral Law or Rabbinic Judaism. Nor are we today. However, the bigger picture I believe that Shaul is attempting to get his Roman readers to realize, and by extension us today, is that we are not under legal constraints that sin places over the human race. With the Plan of Salvation, Restoration and Redemption in place, under the auspices of the Renewed Covenant, the dominion that sin has over Yah’s human creation has been broken. Therefore, we who are the redeemed of Yah, have the wherewithal, through the work of Yeshua Messiah and the help of Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh, to reject sin and flourish under the dominion and rule of Yah’s grace. 

Despite my differences with Stern in his interpretation of under the Law here in Romans 6:14-15, we are by no means done with Stern. In fact, I believe Stern’s “legalism” interpretation of “hupo nomos” is best applied in our next verse of study, for it trumps the penalties and condemnation interpretation we find applicable here in Romans 6:14-15 and judgment within and without the framework of Torah as seen in Romans 2:12.

 

 1 Corinthians 9:20

 

“To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law” (1 Corinthians 9:20; ESV).

Here Shaul describes Jews as being under Torah. These are essentially orthodox Jews Shaul is describing–these were essentially targets for evangelism. And the primary source for Rabbinic Jewish converts to the Way Movement or the true faith once delivered through Shaul’s ministry was the local synagogue. The first place Shaul would always target when evangelizing a new city within the Roman Empire was the synagogue-remember: “To the Jew first and also the non-Jew” (Rom. 1:16; 2:10).

Torah (both the written and oral tradition) to these first-century Jews was a primary marker of their Jewishness. Verses 21 and 22 speaks to Gentiles, described by Shaul as being “outside Torah”. Orthodox Jews saw these, even first century Messianics, as weak since they were not of any legal Jewish status. Thus, these were seen as not being able to stand before the righteous Creator. Rabbinic thinking at that time (probably still today) held that only Jews hold legal status as Yah’s set-apart people. These contend that only the native born or proselyte Jew possessed the legal status to stand as righteous before the Creator (Sanhedrin 10:1f; cp. Isa. 60:21).

 

Shaul says that he put himself “as under Torah” although he was not actually under Torah. In other words, Shaul suggests that he submitted himself to Rabbinic authority in order that he might maintain a connection with the orthodox community and continue to preach and teach the Gospel in that community. For Shaul to be an effective witness of the Gospel within the targeted Rabbinic Jewish community, he subjected himself to Rabbinic authority–the oral law–if not but for a period of time necessary for him to “gain those that were under the law” (1 Cor. 9:20).

So it is here, in this key passage, that I believe Stern’s view of being “under the Law” has everything to do with legalism.

Messianic Commentator and Teacher, Tim Hegg, interprets Shaul’s use of the phrase “under the Law” in this case as one who is under the penalties and condemnation that Torah stipulates as a result of sin. I don’t necessarily agree with Hegg’s interpretation here. However, I will not go so far as to entirely reject his interpretation of “hupo nomos” in this specific passage. Thus, I go with David H. Stern’s interpretation of “hupo nomos” pertaining to legalism.

Again: context-context-context.

 

Galatians 3.23

 

“Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed” (Galatians 3:23; ESV).

Shaul testifies here that knowing the truth about Torah was something that was a far-off thing for his ancestors. Thus living under Torah, absent Mashiyach, Torah served as a sign post pointing the way to Mashiyach. And we saw Mashiyach and His impending ministries foreshadowed in Torah’s various sacrifices and festivals and purity laws. Thus, Torah served as a teacher–a pedagogue–a corrector–and on many occasions as a condemner. Ultimately, Torah served to dampen or mitigate His people’s natural sinful tendencies and direct their hearts  and minds to an abiding faith in Yeshua Messiah within a discipleship paradigm. Once faith in Yeshua is realized, Torah need no longer function in such a convicting, condemning manner, such as would be common to a pedagogue (or a schoolmaster) for an immature, often unruly child. Torah, as Shaul viewed it, serves as a mentor; it shed understanding and enlightened Yah’s people as to the mind of YHVH. Torah is supposed to lead the sinner to Mashiyach, assuming Yah is drawing the would be believer to faith in Mashiyach.

 

Being “under Torah” in this context is being under the rule of a pedagogue. The goal of the pedagogue is to take the child to his/her graduation. However, without Mashiyach, graduation for that child is simply unattainable.

 

Let’s engage in a brief contextual analysis of Galatians 3:21-25:

 

“Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Yeshua Messiah might be given to them that believe. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Messiah, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.”

 

Here Shaul outlines for the Galatian legalists the true purpose of Torah, which had nothing to do with the proselytizing  and circumcision of non-Jewish converts. For according to the Galatian legalists, the only human beings who Yah recognized as His elect were ethnic Jews. And for these Galatian influencers or legalists, Torah and or their manmade “works of law” formed the foundation or basis of their identity as a people of God.

 

Shaul, however, intended for the influencers or legalists to understand that it was faith in Mashiyach and in His sacrifice for the sins of humanity that made one a redeemed soul and child of the Most High. Torah then, serves a condemnatory role–“under the law” meaning one who is under the condemnatory weight of Torah’s penalties. According to Tim Hegg, in such, Torah exposes the “law breaker” “with the guilt that they carry; naturally guiding and directing them to the salvation and freedom that is [marvelously] available in Mashiyach” (Commentary on The Book of Romans by Tim Hegg of Torah Resources).

Now, I would add to the commentary on this passage that there’s a lot to unpack with this verse and I will not do it justice by simply commenting on the phrase “under the Law” here. Given the depth of content here, I’ll likely, Abba willing, conduct a whole discussion on this passage once we get to our discussion on Paul and the Book of Galatians later this year. But I do want to mention that understanding of this passage remains all the more relevant today as it was in the Apostle’s day. For we see so many Messianic fellowships and congregations place so much emphasis on the traditions, ordinances and practices of both the Oral and Written Laws, while Yah’s Grace and Yeshua’s sacrificial ministry is completely overlooked in the thoughts, worship and overall focus of these assemblies or gatherings. I’ve referred to this excessive practice as Torah-Torah-Torah-focused. Not saying that Torah is done away with (Yah no!), nor am I saying that Torah is irrelevant. What I’m saying is there must be perspective when we walk out this Faith of ours. And our eyes must always be on our Master, Yeshua Messiah and our actions must be controlled by the Ruach HaKodesh.

One of the themes or sub-headings for this podcast ministry is: Yeshua-focused Torah-living. Yeshua came, not only to atone for our sins and repair the breach that existed between Yah and His human creation. He also came to clarify and model Torah for us. He was, in every respects, the walking-talking Torah and He is our Yah-given example as to how we are to walk out this Faith.

Sorry: but no Rabbi nor Torah Teacher nor congregation nor synagogue should ever become our focus. Our relationship with the Most High should always be our focus, with Yeshua as our example for achieving and maintaining that relationship. Torah is our constitution and Father’s house-rules that we as Yah’s redeemed are most happy to abide by, so that we may walk in accordance with Yah’s established Ways. But Torah must not be the end-all-be-all of our lives in Mashiyach. Instead, our relationship–the integrity and depth of our relationship with YHVH our Elohim should always take center stage. Torah helps us maintain that relationship.

All I’m saying here is perspective and balance is critical to our walk in and with Messiah.

 

Galatians 4:4-5

 

“But when the fullness of time had come, Yah sent forth His Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.”

 

It is an established fact that Torah condemns both the sin and its sinner. So with that understanding in mind, is it reasonable to conclude, based upon a baseline read of this verse, that Yeshua was born and lived under the condemnation of Torah? No. Why? Because Yeshua was without sin as Shaul writes in Romans 5:12:

 

“Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned…”

 

The conventional wisdom that is tied to Galatians 4:4, which mentions YHVH’s Son being “born of a woman born under the law” is simply the understanding that our Master was born a Jew and being born a Jew was expected to keep the written and oral Laws.

 

But let’s circle back and reaffirm the meaning of being “under the Law.” We determined that being “under the Law” in Romans 6:14-15, contextually-speaking, means to be subject to the penalties and condemnation that Torah places upon the unredeemed–sinners. Those, on the other hand who are redeemed of Messiah, do not face the penalties and condemnation that Torah requires for sin. The adopted, covenant sons and daughters of the Most High are redeemed and saved from Torah’s condemnation.

 

Does the understanding of “under the Law” that we arrived in back in Romans 6:14-15 apply to Galatians 4:4? Is Shaul also telling his Galatian readers that Yeshua was subject to the penalties and condemnation of Torah like the rest of unredeemed humanity?

 

The answer to this question is found in 2 Corinthians 5:21 where Shaul wrote:

 

“For He hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him” (ASV).

 

So it should be apparent that despite Yeshua being the only sinless human to have ever walked this planet, Father placed upon Him the penalties and condemnation of the whole of humankind’s sin. His taking on the condemnation and penalties of humankind’s sin, because He Himself was sinless, canceled out or nullified debt that every human being has incurred upon themselves because of sin. This was Yah’s grace in action. And that grace is extended to those who trust in Yeshua’s sacrifice and who have entered into and established a covenant relationship with the Almighty.

Torah was never meant to save humanity from their sins. Yet when Yeshua had come on the scene and had completed His sacrificial work, and His Gospel message was proclaimed to the masses, beginning primarily with the Jews, most rejected Yeshua and His sacrifice. They could not get around the thinking that their eternal life rested upon their ties and adherence to the written and oral Torahs. These were incapable of recognizing that their continued dependence upon the Law as opposed to the sacrificial work of Messiah done on their behalf, kept them in a condemnatory and penalty-laden way of life without any chance of escape. For with Torah alone, there is no eternal life to be had. And any true relationship with the Most High can only be had within the framework of Torah itself. In such a person’s life, there exists a perpetual cycle of sacrifices and ordinances processes that must be followed precisely according to the instructions that the Creator gave. Failure to maintain that high-level, precise way of life makes one at odds with YHVH. And no one can realistically maintain that precise level of adherence to Torah without Yah’s help, which came through the ministry of His Son, under the auspices of Father’s renewed covenant, and facilitated by the work of the Holy Spirit operating in the life of the would-be child of the Most High.

Unfortunately even today, Orthodox Jews who reject Yeshua as their Messiah, find themselves in a most dire spiritual situation. They are indeed under a curse because they’ve chosen to rely on their religion–their sages and their oral traditions and laws and a watered down version of the written Law as the means by which they would receive eternal life and be in relationship with the Almighty.

Shaul echoes this reality to his Galatian readers in 3:10:

“For as many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse: for it is written, ‘Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the Law to do them'”ASV–cf. Deuteronomy 27:26–“Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them…” KJV).

 

It can be safely understood that although Yahoshua was born “hupo nomon” (that is, “under the Law”), He remained free from sin and thus was not “hupo hamartian” or “under sin.”

So the best way to understand this passage of Galatians 4:4-5 is to recognize that Yeshua, the sinless man that He was, was “under the Law,” not just because He was born a Jew who was born into a life that was subject to the ways and things of Torah, but Yeshua was more so “under the Law” by virtue of the fact that the condemnation and penalty that Torah levels upon all humanity because of sin, would ultimately be placed upon Him on our behalf. And because of what He chose to endure on our behalf (that being “under the Law”), we who are the redeemed of the Most High are no longer “under the Law” but “under grace.” Praise Yah!

 

Galatians 4:21

“Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not listen to the law.”

Those who rely upon their ethnic status for their salvation and relationship with the Eternal are as slaves and are under condemnation of Torah. Thus, in this case, ultimately being under Torah means being “under condemnation of Torah”. However, contextually speaking, Shaul seems to be pointing to those Judaizers who insisted that the only Way to be reconciled unto YHVH and be deemed righteous before a Holy and Just Creator is to subject themselves to the lifestyle and ways of Rabbinic Judaism. Again, this seems to go straight back to the understanding that one’s salvation and redemption and restoration came exclusively to the Jew through their Jewishness and possession of both the Oral and Written laws. The problem with placing one’s trust in either set of laws (ie., desiring to be under the law) for purposes of being redeemed of and restored unto YHVH cannot–can never–work. Such redemption and restoration and salvation comes only through the grace of Yah that was manifested through Yeshua’s ministries. Depending upon the keeping of the Jewish law for one’s salvation and restoration and redemption leads only to condemnation because of the penalties associated with sin that, with their rejection of Yeshua and His sacrifice, have NOT been answered to.

 

And finally 6. Galatians 5:18

 

“But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.

 

Here Shaul contrasts the leading of the Ruach HaKodesh to being under Torah. To be under Torah in this case is for one to rely upon Torah (written and oral Torah) as the sole means of establishing a covenant relationship with the Almighty through one’s ethnic status. Native born and proselyte.

 

Therefore, being “under Torah” in this sense means:

 

  1. One is under the condemnation of Torah. And:
  2. It defines those who are reliant upon Torah to provide them their “Jewish or elect status”, which they believe will afford them entry into the Kingdom of Yah.

 

Being under Torah is contrasted here with being under grace as we saw back in Romans 6:14-15. Those who are under Torah are reliant upon Torah to under-gird their Jewish righteous status and make them righteous before a Just and Holy God. In so doing, they remain under the condemnation and penalties of Torah. Those who are “under grace” however, are reliant upon Yah’s gift of eternal life and inputted righteousness and forgiveness of sin. These do not keep Torah for purposes of achieving salvation or establishing and maintaining a covenant relationship with the Most High. Instead, these keep Torah for the purposes of obeying Yah; pleasing YHVH; and because it is the right thing to do in the sight of the One who gave Torah to us in the first place.

 

So in conclusion: In a general sense, one who is “under the Law” (ie., hupo nomos) is one who is subject to the penalties and condemnation that Torah levels upon those who are not walking in covenant with YHVH our Elohim, which is made possible through Yah’s grace which includes the sacrificial ministry of Yeshua and the work of Holy Spirit operating in their respective lives. “Hupo nomos” or “under the Law” is in no way a prohibition against keeping Torah by Yah’s set-apart, covenant-keeping and walking people. In fact, one is released from the dominion and power that sin has over them as a result of Yeshua’s sacrifice, the power of Yah’s Holy Spirit operating in their lives and walking in Yah’s holy and righteous ways. Those who choose to walk in covenant with the Eternal are under Yah’s grace (ie., hupo kharis).

 

Being “under the Law,” depending on the context of the Pauline passage being read, can refer to Rabbinic legalism. This form of being “under the Law” is essentially a refusal by some to walk out their faith in Spirit and Truth, under Yah’s umbrella of grace. Instead, these steadfastly hold on to the false hope that the keeping of the Jewish or Rabbinic traditions and laws will save them and bring them into right relationship or covenant relationship with the Almighty. But the truth of the matter is that legalistic-based salvation only leads to one having to answer to the penalties and condemnation that Torah levels upon humankind because of sin.

 

And lastly, depending upon which English translation you may be using, “under the Law” may refer to one being judged by the holy and righteous Creator within the framework of Torah.  

Action 

 

So with all that’s been said on the subject of being “under the Law” as written by the Apostle Shaul in this series within a series, I pray that you don’t simply take my word on this subject and base your understanding on this phrase solely upon our discussion here. For that matter, I pray that you don’t simply reject what we’ve discussed either. Instead, I would humbly encourage you to take all that we’ve discussed over the course of this 4-part series and conduct your own study on this subject. And don’t just focus on the expressed meaning or interpretation of “under the Law,” but use the apostle’s teaching and mention of the phrase to enhance your overall understanding of Yah’s great plan of salvation, restoration and redemption; the sanctification process; and how you and I are to properly walk in covenant with our Creator and do so in Spirit and in Truth. This is the ultimate point behind our series on Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

And the ultimate take-away I pray you receive from this discussion is that you are NOT under Torah if you are truly walking in covenant with YHVH our Elohim. You are not subject to the penalties and condemnation that Torah levels upon unrepentant humanity. Additionally, you are not subject to, nor should you subject yourself to legalism. Yeshua bore the penalties and condemnation that Torah leveled upon unrepentant humanity. And because we worship our Elohim and walk in covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe, and we do so in Spirit and in Truth, all of which was made possible through the sacrificial ministry of Yeshua Messiah, we do not in any way, shape or form need to subject ourselves nor trust in a legalistic system that will never free you from the condemnation and penalties of Torah in the first place. It only keeps us in bondage and subjugates us to manmade rules and traditions that have little to nothing to do with YHVH and His Ways. We are in fact operating under grace. And if we stay in obedient covenant relationship with the Eternal, our salvation is sure. And that my friend, is the greatest thing anyone could every imagine and receive in this life.

 

So with that, we’ll bring not only this installment of TMTO to a close, but also this 4-part series to a close as well.

 

Thank you for sticking it out with me. Thank you for your support and continued listenership.

 

Abba willing, we’ll be back next week with another installment of TMTO. Until then, and as always, may you be most blessed fellow saints in training.

 

Shalom

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

  My Torah Portion Observation of the Week I was profoundly moved by the section of this week’s Torah portion that recorded what on the surface seemed the very harsh and violent encounter we had with YHVH. It was Parashah 26: Sh’mini, Eight and I wish to briefly...

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

Select Your Passover Lamb

I'm Reminded I’m reminded when looking over our copy of the Hebrew Observational Calendar that today is the day that we would select the unblemished animal of the first-year that would serve as our paschal lamb. Choosing a Lamb Today Certainly, today, the vast...

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me..." (The Apostle Paul to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers) Well, I’m going to take a slight break from our series on the plurality of the Godhead series to tackle one of the Apostle Paul’s many difficult passages that the...

Paul on Being Under the Law Part 3–Keeping Passover 2021 and Sin Consciousness

1 Corinthians 5:7-Get rid of the old hametz, so that you can be a new batch of dough, because in reality you are unleavened. For our Pesach lamb, the Messiah, has been sacrificed (CJB).

 Yeshua is our Pesach

How appropriate for this time of year wouldn’t you say. And this of course fits right within our discussion series on being “under the Law/Torah.” So in the interest of continuing along in our series within a series so that we can ultimately answer the question of what Paul meant when he wrote that sin no longer had dominion over his Roman readers as they were no longer under the Law but under grace, I want to touch upon the concept of “sin consciousness” and give you my thoughts and reflections on the Spring Feasts of YHVH which begins this weekend for most of us.

 

So let’s begin our discussion by conducting a brief contextual overview of 1 Corinthians 5:

 

Paul Receives Bad News from the Corinthians

 

We learn from verse 1 of this chapter that Shaul had received word from a member of the Corinthian Assemblies that a male member of their assemblies was engaged in a most inappropriate sexual relationship with his father’s wife (5:1b). And based upon the apostle’s response to this situation it would seem that he was taken aback by the exceptionally disgusting nature of this man’s sin. (I find it interesting, as an aside, that the apostle only makes mention of the male who was involved in this sinful relationship; making no mention of this man’s mother-in-law. Is it possible that this man’s mother-in-law was not a member of the Corinthian Assemblies, but only this man? Just throwing that out there.)

 Paul Shocked Over the News

Continuing: For what we know about Shaul is that he was a well-traveled soul who by virtue of his apostleship to the Gentiles or “goyim,” would have no doubt been exposed to a vast array of cultures and social practices. And his response to this situation, based upon his own travel-experiences, compelled him to inform his readers that such disgusting sinful behavior was not even practiced by the peoples of heathen nations. Shaul’s direct accusative statement here causes me to believe that the transgressor in this case was a Messianic Jew for the simple reason that the apostle comments that not even heathens behave in so vile a manner as this.

 Corinthian Man’s Sin a Serious Violation of Torah

The apostle, of course, would have immediately recognized that such shocking behavior was in violation of Torah, specifically Leviticus 18: 8 and Deuteronomy 22:30, which reads:

 

“The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.” 

 

Shaul would have also realized that the punishment to be had for such an exceptional violation of Torah was divine judgment (I.e., a curse) as indicated in Deuteronomy 27:20, which reads:

 

“Cursed be he that lieth with his father’s wife; because he uncovereth his father’s skirt” (KJV).

 

(And the phrase “uncovereth his father’s skirt” is a circumlocution or vague way of saying, “he dishonors his father” because of what he is doing. I also believe that the use of this vague manner of speaking, which is seen throughout the scriptures, is the ancient writers’ method of exercising decorum by not giving any more attention to the heinous act than already is readily is known.)

 The 12-Sins that Bring About Curses Chapter of Torah

Deuteronomy 27 is recognized by some as the “12-Curses” chapter of Torah. The curses mentioned in this chapter are directly attached to certain behaviors or actions by people that fall into a class of sins the Almighty has deemed particularly troubling. These sins include:

 

  • Idolatry
  • Exercising dishonor of or disrespecting one’s parents
  • Moving property boundary lines with the intent of absconding a portion of another’s rightful property
  • Intentionally harming the blind
  • Causing injustices or harm to come upon the helpless of one’s community
  • Incest and other forms of sexual immorality
  • Murder
  • Bribery, especially for purposes of perverting justice
  • And outright disobedience of Torah.

 

The Eternal Himself would mete out His righteous judgment upon those who commit these transgressions. Thus the use of the term “curseth” to describe what is to happen to these particular transgressors.

 Curses in the Hebrew Mindset

The Hebraic understanding of one being cursed goes well beyond mere wishing that some form of ill-will or bad fortune would overtake the transgressor. In fact, the curse itself carried with it power to bring about a negative effect. A sin that Yah has deemed worthy of a curse signifies that at some point He would intercede in the situation and render judgment Himself, which would most likely result in the transgressors’ death. The harshness of the judgment was intended to bring an end to that evil which has the negative spiritual capacity, if you will, of tainting the Land. (What did Shaul write: “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump”? In other words, when such transgressions are allowed to go un-addressed and unpunished, that sin acts as though it were a contagion. And that contagion has the great potential of spreading and infecting other members of the community. Thus, such transgressions must be immediately addressed and purged from the community before it spreads to the rest of the community.)

Action Needed to be Taken

So Shaul recognized that he had to put an immediate stop to this disgusting affair before its effects would spread throughout the assemblies, or Yah Himself brought down judgment upon the whole of the community.

 

This situation was made all the more tragic and troublesome to Shaul in that the assembly members were aware of this cursed-relationship. The Corinthians, in particular the leadership, were in fact tolerating and allowing the cursed-behavior to go on in their midst unabated (5:2). (Obviously, at least one person–the soul who reported the transgression, was as troubled about the problem as Shaul was.) Thus the apostle took those who either turned a blind eye to the transgression, or who encouraged it (I.e., those proud or puffed up over the situation), and shamed them for their lack of righteous responsibility in dealing with the situation. The community, Shaul chided, was responsible for removing the fornicator–the transgressor–from their midst.

 That Heart-Thing Again

Thus the supposed-renewed hearts of the community and her leaders (that is their attitudes), according to Shaul, should have been diametrically opposite to the permissive heart or attitude they were displaying in response to this situation, which essentially favored the transgressor and his transgression to persist in their midst. The renewed heart of the people of the assembly should been one that mourned over the occurrence of this situation in their midst (verse 2). According to the apostle, it should have been all the more apparent to them upon their learning of and confirming the existence of this evil, that they would have to immediately expel the individual from their midst. In fact, Shaul in verse 3 inserts himself in the equation by stating that he was outraged by this situation and he had already formed judgment in his heart and mind as to how this situation should have been handled by them. Shaul, in effect, was shaming the assembly members by saying that he himself did not need to be there to know what needed to be done (5:3-4). Instead of proudly permitting such evil to transpire in their midst, they should have acted in accordance to Yah’s word.

 

It is obvious to me that there were at the very least some Jewish Messianic members of the assemblies who would know better and who should have been the first to step forward and speak out against this situation. 

 Paul Rules on the Issue

Thus the apostle directs the assembly members to imagine him being in their midst when they meet together to address the issue. Knowing the apostle’s mind and heart on this issue, they  had no other choice but to expel the sinner from their midst, leaving him to the consequences of his sin. The ultimate goal of such an action on the part of the community leaders was not so much to render harsh judgment upon the offender. Indeed, as we noted just previously, such transgressions according to Torah had the potential of being directly addressed by the Almighty Himself. So righteous judgment would at some point be rendered or meted out upon the offender by Yah. The ultimate purpose in expelling that member from the Corinthian assemblies was to purge out the evil that had occurred within their Faith Community and stem any spread of sin amongst the membership. Furthermore, the expulsion could potentially serve as a wake-up call for this individual that he had to turn from his evil ways and seek forgiveness from a forgiving God. In so doing, the gentleman might, at some point, be restored to the Body and his salvation (5:5).

 Paul Chides His Readers for their Inaction and Tolerance of Sin in Their Midst

So Shaul again chides the assembly members for their permissive and grossly negligent mishandling of this situation. And he provides the members of the assembly a reason why their lack of spiritual responsiveness and irresponsibility in dealing with this situation was as troubling and dangerous as the fornicator’s sin. Shaul reminds the assembly leaders that their permissiveness (I.e., their boasting) of this situation was shameful (I.e., not good). And he reminds them that it only takes a little leaven–the fermenting agent that makes dough rise–to cause the whole batch of dough to rise. The use of the concept and term leaven here by Shaul is brilliant. For the apostle’s metaphoric use of the concept and term leaven was effective in relaying how sin–corruption and evil within the Body or Community–although at times starting off with or involving just one or two individuals, can quite easily in time spread and pervert others within the community (5:6). That’s why, in great part, Abba did not tolerate “unresolved” or “un-addressed” sin to exist among His people. For Abba clearly recognized that if sin is permitted to go un-addressed among a people, that sin would spread throughout the community and cause that community to turn away from Him and His ways (Deu. 13:5; 19:19; 24:7; 17:7; 21:21). And so the Eternal sees or views such a situation as was described in our discussion here today from the perspective of sin being contagious in nature. Thus He established that His set-apart community has the potential of being defiled as long as the transgressor, along with their sin, is allowed to operate in the community’s midst (Num. 35:33; Deu. 19:10). In other words: There must be an immediate reckoning of the situation and righteous actions taken to expel that evil from their midst.

 Purge Out the Old Leaven

So Shaul instructs his Corinthian readers to “purge out” (I.e., ekkathairo; which means to cleanse out; to clean thoroughly) the old hametz from their lives (5:7). In other words, the apostle was metaphorically instructing his readers to clean out–get rid of–remove from their lives that which has the potential of corrupting them and leading them to sin. The apostle instructed them to root out sin from their lives and in effect, become “sin-conscious” in their walk with Mashiyach because when that metaphorical leaven is allowed to fester in their lives, it has the very real potential of spreading and causing systemic and organizational breakdown; corruption; and a community-wide turning away from the Ways of Yah.

 

I mentioned “sin-consciousness” here. Let me take a brief moment to explain what I mean by this term.

 Sin Consciousness–Torah Gives us Understanding of What the Creator Hates and Approves Of

We know that Torah was given to us so that we would have knowledge of that which Yah disapproves of and considers to be sin. Thus, Torah serves to inform of that which Yah hates and of those things that we must avoid as His chosen ones.

 Sin Consciousness–A Twisted Definition and Explanation

According to some in fundamental Christianity, there is an inherent danger that is tied to one being focused on whether or not they are walking in covenant with Yah and His Ways and whether or not they are pleasing Father and not sinning. For some, it is believed that when one dwells too much on their sin that they become “sin-conscious.” Sin-Consciousness, according to some, is “an attitude or state of mind wherein we tend to focus on sin’s power, magnifying IT instead of God’s grace in Christ Jesus.” In other words, constantly thinking about sin “makes us want to do it” (J.B. Cachila, 11/19/2016, Christian Today).  

 

The author concludes his rather lengthy article on the subject of being “sin conscious” by admonishing his readers to be “grace-conscious” instead; meaning that they should always be filling their hearts and minds with gratitude for what Messiah has done for them. Others also support this same thinking or a similar understanding that sin increases with knowledge of Torah. These contend that the Law actually “provokes sin” as some, in my opinion, understand or interpret Romans 7:8 which reads:

 

“But sin, finding opportunity in the commandment [to express itself], got a hold on me and aroused and stimulated all kinds of forbidden desires (lust, covetousness). For without the Law sin is dead [the sense of it is inactive and a lifeless thing] (Amp).

 Opposition to the Twisted Understanding of Sin Consciousness

Now, I’m not entirely opposed to the entirety of J. B. Cachila’s premise and understanding of “sin consciousness.” The problem I have with his/her explanation of this concept, however, is that it misses the fact that we who are Yah’s elect, have by virtue of our redeemed status as Yah’s covenant-keeping people, inherited the power and wherewithal to say “NO” to sin through the power and agency of Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh.

The other thing I want to mention that is in opposition to the traditionalists’ understanding of “sin-consciousness” is that the introduction or gifting of Torah to Yah’s chosen-ones, caused the knowledge of or understanding of what Yah considers as sin to increase. And because of this reality, the very same introduction of Torah coupled with the work of Yahoshua Messiah also caused grace to abound all the more. We, through Torah, learned that we were in a desperate situation and in need of a savior.

 Sin Consciousness Not Something to Shy Away From

My view of “sin consciousness” is diametrically opposite of that of most fundamentalists. For I see sin consciousness, not as a thing to avoid or fear or marginalize, but as something that every child of the Most High must possess.

 

Knowing how Yah views certain behaviors and what Yah identifies as sin is paramount to the child of Yah maintaining a substantive covenant relationship with the Eternal. And in order for the child of Yah to be scripturally sin conscious, he or she must know and understand Torah; he or she must live Torah; he or she must study Torah to the point that he or she recognizes what behaviors Yah approves of and what He does not approve of.

 Orthodoxy’s Rejection of Torah Influencing Their Understanding of Biblical Sin Consciousness

You see, orthodoxy, fundamentalists and evangelicals, in their rejection of Torah, demand their adherents focus on their version of God’s grace. They don’t want their people keeping Torah nor do they really want them having a relationship with the Almighty. Instead, they want their people to have a true and substantive relationship with the Church Triumphant and they want them keeping their Laws–their organization’s torah if you will. Thus the organizations’ leaders have encouraged their adherents to not study their bibles and learn what “thus saith Yah.” Instead, these organizations have underhandedly taught their followers to study and learn and follow the teachings and ways of the Church Triumphant. For the Church Triumphant tells the people what to believe; how to act; how to live; what to do and not do; what to focus on in their lives and what not; etc.

 Orthodoxy’s Refusal to Address the Sin Issue

If you notice, when you turn on Christian television shows today, there is rarely, if any, mention or teachings given by church leaders directly from scripture. Church pastors, teachers, preachers and what have you, are not interested in teaching their followers to abstain from sin and resist taking the broad pathway that leads to destruction (Mat. 7:13). You’ll rarely, if ever, hear these leaders demand that their followers enter the strait gate and walk the narrow way that leads to life. No. The only concern they have for their followers is their entering the broad gate and walking the smooth and wide pathways of their organizations. (I remember a song we used to sing in the Baptist Church of my youth: “It’s a highway to heaven…”) And maybe, it is hoped, in the process of their followers walking out that highway to heaven, that their followers will kick down some money to them and advance their organization’s goals.

 

There is no true sense of sin consciousness in the hearts and minds and souls of most would-be believers. There’s no sense of abhorring evil and sin; recognizing that they’ve fallen short of Yah’s established principles and Way of life and that they are in desperate need of a redeemer (Rom. 3:23-25).

 

 Torah Does Not Cause One To Sin–We Sin Because of our Stubbornness  to Conform to God’s Ways

 

Frankly, I don’t understand the thinking that one who possesses sin consciousness is prone to commit sin. So then, in other words, according to the fundamentalists–anti-Torah crowd–when one focuses on their sinful state or their propensity to violate Yah’s Torah, he or she will be prone to violate Yah’s Torah.

 

I don’t know about you, but when the scales were dropped from my eyes, my heart was softened and my ears were opened to Yah’s Truth and Way of Life, and I studied Yah’s Word and learned that I was in error and in sin for not keeping His instructions throughout my whole life. Thus, I did not seek to, nor was I enticed to continue, violating Yah’s Torah. In fact, I was mournful and sorrowful and anxious to make things right with Yah. I sought vigorously to change my ways and do what “thus saith YHVH.” I had no thought to return to my old ways. When I studied and found the error of my ways, I sought forgiveness for my sinful life from the Eternal through Yeshua my Master and I changed my ways to Yah’s Ways. I believe I, like many of you, ultimately became sin conscious as I studied Yah’s Word. I in fact became conscious of my missing YHVH’s established marks as outlined in His Torah. And I learned that I was in desperate need of a savior and redeemer that would rescue me from the penalties associated with my violations of Yah’s Torah and that would ultimately open the door to my having a true and substantive relationship with the Eternal.

 

True, biblical sin consciousness leads to life. A lack of sin consciousness leads to destruction 

 

This concept of sin consciousness, I feel, is very timely as we enter into the Pesach season. For it is through this sacred 8-day period that we rehearse the sacrificial-atoning ministry of our Master Yahoshua; the sanctification process that all Yah’s chosen-ones must participate in; and the prophetic significance of Yahoshua, our Master, being the Firstfruits of all who will enter into life eternal through a true and substantive relationship with the Almighty. And throughout this whole spring feast season we are reminded to be sin conscious so that we may walk in covenant with our heavenly Father  through the help and inspiration of Yah’s precious Ruach HaKodesh (cf. Gen. 17:1; Mat. 5:48; 2 Cor. 7:1). Our model for walking in covenant with the Almighty is our Master Yeshua.

 God’s Set-Apart People as New Lumps of Dough Devoid of Leaven

Still touching upon the concept of the true Child of the Most High being dead to sin (which we discussed in great detail last installment–Part-2–Torah Meets Grace), Shaul reminds the Corinthian Messianics that they are supposed to be without corruption and sin. They in fact were supposed to be new creatures in Mashiyach; or in Shaul’s metaphorical framework here, they were supposed to be new lumps of dough that is absent any leavening agent (I.e., absent corruption and evil). Yah’s people are receiving a “start-over;” a new beginning; a make-over; a clean slate that would allow Yah’s Ruach (I.e., Yah’s Spirit) to be infused into their beings.

 Paul’s Brilliant Merging of the Corinthian’s Problem with the Significance of Passover

And Shaul brings this metaphor of that which is leavened versus that which is unleavened  home by infusing into his discussion here the underlying, prophetic meaning of Pesach (I.e., Passover). The apostle brilliantly acknowledges that all of this–this purging out or cleaning out of his readers’ old, corrupt ways and bringing them to the place of being new lumps of dough, was made possible by the vicarious sacrifice of Mashiyach. As Shaul states it, Yahoshua HaMashiyach is our Pesach (I.e., our Passover) (5:7).

 

And maybe, as evident by the wording of verse 8, this letter of 1 Corinthians was written sometime close to Pesach (5:8). For Shaul encourages the Corinthian Messianics to keep Pesach (which includes the Feast of Unleavened Bread) with a spirit and mindset of them being new lumps of dough devoid of any leavening (2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 6:15).

 The Apostle Demands the Corinthians Purge Leaven From Their Midst

So Shaul essentially instructs his readers that all the foolishness that the Apostle was hearing related to their corrupt ways needed to be removed/purged from their midst and from their respective lives (5:8). As individuals they would be required to stop sinning. Equally important, they were not to tolerate nor entertain sin in their assemblies (5:9). In particular Shaul brings the original issue that prompted this discussion back to their attention; that being the fornication issue he wrote about in verses 1 and 2. But the apostle goes on to include all manner of sin that if left unchecked by them as a community, would bring shame and destruction upon the assembly (5:10-12). These and all such transgressions, Shaul commands, are to be purged from their midst, as they ultimately would end up doing to the fornicator mentioned at the start of this chapter. And what happens to those that they purged from their midst because of sinful behavior would be up to Yah and His righteous judgment (5:13).

 Spring Feast Discussion

So having looked at this issue of sin-consciousness using the story of the Corinthian assembly and their failure to properly address the fornicator in their midst as a backdrop, I want to spend the remainder of our time here today discussing the upcoming Spring Feasts of Yah, which we all know includes Pesach or Passover; Unleavened Bread or the Feast of Matzah; and the Day of First Fruits. And we also know that the feasts of Yah, which are embedded in His holy Torah (Rom. 7:12), are shadows of good things to come (Heb. 10:1). And the spiritual relevance and substance of these set-apart days can never be overstated nor honored enough in my humble opinion.

 Yeshua Would Be Crucified on a Set-Date on the Creator’s Calendar

Father appointed that our Master would die for our sins at an appointed time (Rom. 5:6). Thus, it should not be a stretch for any who walk in covenant with the Almighty, that Yahoshua was appointed to die specifically on Pesach or during the Spring feasts. Whichever date Pesach/Passover fell on the day Yahoshua was crucified–some say 27 CE; others 30 CE/AD; still others 33 AD/CE–Pesach ranks as one of the most important set-apart days on Abba’s sacred calendar. The prophetic shadow-picture that was embedded in Pesach and the Spring Feasts of Yah was indeed brought to its fullest realization during the days in which our Master was crucified, buried and resurrected.

 Pesach Foreshadows the Sanctification Process

And we’ve already seen that the apostle Shaul makes a poignant correlation between Yeshua’s sacrifice and Pesach in 1 Corinthians 5:7:

 

“Clean out the old yeast (I.e., leaven) so that you may be a new batch of dough–you are, in fact, without yeast (I.e., leaven). For Christ (I.e., Messiah/Mashiyach), our Passover (I.e., our Pesach) has been sacrificed” (1 Cor. 5:7; NET).

 

Shaul here is touching upon the sanctification process that every would be covenant walking child of the Most High is committed to undergo. The purging of sin from our lives and then walking out our Faith as new creatures, or as Shaul mentions, new lumps of dough,  is prophetically pictured in the Feast of Unleavened Bread.

 The Brilliance and Wisdom of our Creator

Yah, in His brilliance (and I can’t imagine how He pulled it off but He did in the greatest fashion) pulled together 2-set-apart dates on His calendar, separated by at least a millennium and a half, to usher in His great Plan of Salvation, Restoration and Redemption.

 

In the process of redeeming His chosen people Yisrael from Egyptian bondage, YHVH commanded they select for themselves a perfect yearling-lamb or goat on the 10th day of the first month, otherwise known as the month of the Aviv (Exo. 12:5). And then on a specific day at a specific time of that day (sound familiar), slay the creature and apply its blood on to the door posts and lintels of their homes (which was the 14th-day of the month of the Aviv). And soon after this was done, they would prepare the slaughtered lamb to be consumed with other elements as Yah instructed. The women would prepare bread without leaven in anticipation of a rapid departure from Mitsrayim/Egypt the next morning. As their meal, they would consume the roasted lamb or goat as the death angel passed through Mitsrayim; passing over the homes of those who’s doors were marked with the blood of the lamb or goat. The 1st born of those households that were not marked by the blood of the lamb/goat, succumbed to the death angel.

 

This of course foreshadowed the sacrificial ministry of our Master Yahoshua. In prophetic-shadow likeness as our Pesach–our Passover Lamb–our Master was perfect and without sin. Thus, as Shaul stated, the man who was without sin, died for those with sin–the realization of the Feast of Unleavened Bread (2 Cor. 5:21). And then, our Master’s resurrection was prophetically foreshadowed by the Day of First Fruits or the Wave Sheaf Offering.

 Passover Can Never Be Replaced by Easter

It can never be overstated: Yeshua’s death, burial and resurrection can never be tied to pagan horror days such as lent; good Friday and Easter while denying the Truth of the only wise Elohim, His Word and His Son. Everything about our Master and His ministries are intricately tied to and foreshadowed by Yah’s glorious feasts (I.e., Yah’s set-apart days). As the writer of the Cepher of Hebrews wrote regarding the set-apart elements of worship of YHVH, which include Yah’s set-apart days or Feast Days:

 

“They serve as shadows of good things to come” (Heb. 10:1). Praise Yah!

 Passover is About Repairing the Breach Between YHVH and Humankind

As our Pesach, the breach that existed between YHVH and humankind since the Garden incident was repaired. The blood of our Pesach, Yeshua, covers us from all unrighteousness. In so doing, we escape eternal death, which is a natural byproduct of sin. Upon entering in covenant with the Almighty, we become sin conscious–biblically speaking–not consumed over the sins we’ve committed in our lives as orthodoxy has defined sin-consciousness. But we’ve become conscious of the fact that we are called and chosen to be new creatures in Mashiyach. As new creatures in Mashiyach, we are as a corpse to sin. Sin is supposed to be a foreign entity to us; even an enemy if you will. And anything that hints of sin in our walk with Mashiyach, especially during our time of being sanctified or set-apart unto YHVh, we are to purge it from our lives; we are to turn away from it with the ever-present help of Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh.

 Why Can’t Orthodoxy See This Truth?

And the thing that drives me uber crazy is that orthodoxy and fundamentalists reject the significance of Yah’s set-apart days, and they even marginalize the spiritually-charged historical significance Pesach and Unleavened Bread must play in the life of Yah’s set-apart people.

 

No, these choose to hang their spiritual hats on a set of pagan holidays instead; attaching to what I like to call horror-days, the death, burial and resurrection of our Master Yahoshua. As honorable and well-meaning as the orthodox and fundamentalists may appear to some related to their keeping of Easter in lieu of Yah’s Spring Feasts, these are sincerely wrong and mistaken in their understanding and beliefs. There’s is a willful disobedience that will ultimately lead to their being judged by a holy and righteous Elohim.

 We Have Been Called to Image YHVH on this Planet

But we, on the other hand, who have been called and chosen to image YHVH Elohim on this earth, in particular image Him within the confines of communities and spheres of influence He’s placed each of us into, we recognize and cherish which side our spiritual bread is buttered. We recognize that the Feasts are not the Feasts of the Jews, but of YHVH, He who gifted them to us. And because we’ve chosen to walk in covenant with Him and to love Him with our whole being, dying to self-in the process and walking in the newness of life, we keep and walk-out (I.e., halach) His commandments, which include His annual feasts. And we keep and walk-out these feasts in Spirit and in Truth, knowing that each set-apart day on the Eternal’s calendar serves as a reminder of that which He has, is and will be doing for us in His great plan of redemption, restoration and salvation.

 We Must Prepare to Receive the Spring Feasts of Yah

So as the Spring Feasts of Pesach, Unleavened Bread and First Fruits approach this coming week, we prayerfully, and meditatively prepare to receive the days. If you’re like me, I love re-reading, studying and meditating on The Exodus and our Master’s Passion stories. Some of you may also benefit from listening to or watching teachings on various aspects of Pesach, as well as attending fellowship gatherings and services during this time. However the Ruach leads you, do it with joy and passion.

 Honoring and Keeping Yeshua’s Last Supper

Then the night before Pesach–Erev Pesach–3/27/21, I would encourage you to honor the occasion of the last meal our Master had with His inner core of disciples (famously referred to as the Last Supper). And many of you will attend special services that not only mark this most solemn historic event on a true Messianic’s annual calendar, but also delve into the spiritual meaning and applications associated with the various elements of that sacred gathering. I’ve personally attended a number of services and gatherings on this most solemn night of the Month of the Aviv, and I’ve always been blessed by those experiences.

 

Generally speaking, bread and wine is shared and consumed by attendees of these gatherings in solemn memory of, as Shaul wrote to the Corinthian Messianics, “the Master’s death till He comes” (1 Cor. 11:26). This is popularly referred to of course as communion. And many Messianics actually overlook this beautiful ritual since it is not part and parcel of the Exodus Story. But, again, in my humble opinion, ignoring or intentionally failing to honor this spiritually rich and poignant historic event would be in violation of our Master’s instruction to perform this beautiful ritual in solemn remembrance of Him and what He has, is and will do for us (Luk. 22:19).

 

There is, in fact, historical precedence that the early first-century Messianic Assemblies kept this solemn ritual, with some assemblies going so far as to keep this ritual and instruction of our Master each Sabbath.

 

Some groups, in addition to honoring our Master’s last meal, partake in a foot-washing ritual to imitate our Master’s washing His disciples’ feet. This is done in response to Master’s instructions to His disciples: “If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another’s feet” (Joh. 13:14; KJV).

 

Now, many in our Faith Community today reject and decline to participate in foot washing ceremonies, citing that this was done by and passed on by our Master as part of a common, hygienic practice of first-century Middle Easterners and is not applicable or necessary for today’s Messianics to keep or practice. These set aside any relevant spiritual application that Yeshua may have been attempting to convey to His disciples at the time.

 Convocations–Gathering Together to Keep the Spring Feasts of God

I’ve participated in a number of foot-washing ceremonies throughout my walk in this Faith of ours. And I understand where those who reject foot washing ceremonies for today’s Messianics are coming from. However, I find such reverential practices as foot washing ceremonies to be an individual, Ruach-Spirit-led choice that each Messianic must come to terms with. I will say also that any who would be led to participate in such a ritual or ceremony, Yah bless you and may you find rich meaning in your honoring of Yahoshua’s example. Regardless which side you go with on the issue of foot washing, to use Shaul’s vernacular, let no one judge you in your keeping of the foot washing tradition or not; especially as it relates to your doing that which the Ruach HaKodesh leads you to do. Obviously, if you are not privy to being a part of a fellowship or Messianic group that honors our Master’s Last Meal ceremony, earnestly seek Yah’s will for you in that respect. And if He leads you to keep this honoring ceremony of the Master’s Last Meal alone, then keep it alone with as much reverence, Truth and joy that you can muster. But it is always preferable that we be in convocation with other like-minded brethren as Yah makes those opportunities available to us. The writer of Hebrews actually addressed this concern when he wrote:

 

“And let us take thought of how to spur one another on to love and good works (I.e., good deeds), not abandoning our own meetings, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging each other, and even more so because you see the day drawing near” (10:24-25; NET).

 

The point of covocating with other like-minded brethren, especially during this set-apart season, is to not only facilitate our personal growth in Mashiyach, but also to encourage one another in these last and evil days.

 Keeping Passover–Pesach

Moving on: Pesach of course, falls on the next evening at sundown, 3/28, which by the way, dovetails seamlessly into the start of the 7-day Feast of Unleavened Bread; also referred to by some as the Feast of Matzah. As Torah-honoring people of Yah, we keep this night to the best of our ability as Yah’s Ruach so leads. Hilary and I generally read the applicable Exodus passages as we partake in a modest meal consisting of roasted lamb and bitter herbs. And we also begin our week-long eating of Unleavened Bread at this juncture.

 

A couple things come to mind in my discussing our keeping of Pesach and Unleavened Bread:

 

At the very least, prior to our having the Pesach meal, Hilary and I will have saw to it that all leaven and leaven-type products have been discarded from our home in obedience to Exodus 12:19; 13:7.

 

Secondly, it should be noted that Pesach Day itself is not a so-called “high-holy day.” That being said, one is certainly permitted to work if it is necessary for them to do so. However, once sundown hits, and as we go directly into our Pesach meal and the Feast of Unleavened Bread commences, we will enter into a “high holy day” whereby we are to convene/proclaim a holy convocation and we are to do no servile work during that 24-hour period. Our focus must then be upon Yah and what He’s done, is doing and will do for us. And we are encouraged to keep this set-apart time as Shaul instructed his Corinthian readers: “…with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Cor. 5:8). 

 

Now, as a Faith Community, we are all over the place as it pertains to our keeping Pesach. For instance, many Messianics choose to go the route of the traditional Jewish Seder. Hilary and I, on the other hand, do not participate in Seders, so to speak.

 Partaking of the Orthodox Passover Seder

The reason we do not participate in Orthodox Jewish-type Passover Seders is because they are highly regulated by Rabbinic traditions, and unfortunately, over the centuries, paganism has seeped into and tainted Yah’s commanded Passover meal. Torah outlines what the actual Passover meal is supposed to consist of. The orthodox Passover Seder, on the other hand, includes elements and traditions that Yah never told us to include in His meal. Abba commanded us not to add to nor diminish from that which He has commanded us to do.

 

Nevertheless, I recognize that a sizable chunk of the members of our Faith Community are drawn to and are loyal to many such Jewish traditions. And of course, it falls to each of us to walk out our Faith, as Shaul wrote to His Philippian readers, “…with fear and trembling.”

 

So I would only advise caution when choosing how you will keep, observe and honor Pesach  and the Passover meal. Let Yah’s Ruach properly lead you this respect.

 The Feast of Unleavened Bread

The 7-days of the Feast of Unleavened Bread is similar to Sukkot (I.e., the Feast of Tabernacles) in that we are to proclaim and convene holy convocations as well as do no servile work on the first and last days of both these week-long feasts (Lev. 23). However, the days that fall between the first and the last days we are free to go about our day-to-day affairs. The thing that sets both these week-long festivals apart from some of the other set-apart days of Yah is that they were originally “pilgrimage” feasts.

 Feast of Unleavened Bread a Pilgrimage Feast

Of the 7-mandated Feasts or set-apart days of Yah’s sacred calendar year, Father appointed 3 of them as pilgrimage feasts: Pesach-Unleavened Bread; Shavuot or Pentecost; and Sukkot or Feast of Tabernacles (Exo. 23:14-17; Deu. 16:16). It is not coincidence that these 3-pilgrimage feasts take place during our ancient cousins’ 3 major harvest seasons: Pesach-Unleavened Bread during the spring harvest; Shavuot or Pentecost during the summer harvest; and Sukkot or Tabernacles during the fall harvest. As pilgrimage feasts, our ancient cousins were required to leave their homes and journey to the place where Yah placed His Name over in response to these harvest seasons. The ultimate and most well-known of those sacred places was of course Jerusalem. And it was at these sacred places–the place where the Ark of the Covenant rested within the Tabernacle/Tent of Meeting and ultimately the Temple in Yerushalayim–that Yah’s people would gather and joyously worship the Almighty in their giving of tithes and offerings that were based upon the proceeds and increase they received from their harvests. Additionally, the pilgrims would receive teachings of Yah’s Word; they would undergo various washings and purifications or mikvehs; and there would of course be recitations of prayers and scripture at these gatherings.

 

With Yah’s temple and or tabernacle no longer in operation at Yerusalayim, we really can’t keep these 3 pilgrimage feasts as Torah puts forth. However, there’s nothing stopping us from keeping these pilgrimage feasts in Spirit and in Truth. As long as we keep the basic elements of the feasts, and do so in Spirit and in Truth, Yah will work individually with us to direct us in the ways He wants us to worship Him and keep His appointed times.

 

Now, I don’t in any way mean to suggest that you keep the pilgrimage feast of Unleavened Bread as I am led to do. You see, this is an issue between you and YHVH. I’m simply giving you here that which Hilary and I have been led to do over the many years we’ve walked in covenant with the Eternal. I’m simply sharing with you what we do.

 

On these 3-pilgrimage, set-apart days, we would traditionally arrange taking the time off from our day-to-day lives and if possible and available, travel to assemblies where like-minded brethren were keeping these feasts days. When those opportunities were not available to us, such as this year, we will set-aside the week of Unleavened Bread as holy and special and honor the time with focused studies, prayers, celebration and the like. You see, upon our coming into covenant with YHVH and walking in this Faith, we chose to abandon yearly secular vacations in exchange for the pilgrimage feasts. The pilgrimage feasts were, I guess you could say, our vacation-times away from our secular lives. And because we’ve fully incorporated the Feasts of Yah into our lives to such a degree, we have been enormously blessed and our walk with Mashiyach has been notably enhanced.

 

Again, this is not in any way to suggest that you do the same. The only thing I would suggest to you is that you seek Yah’s perfect will for your life in Messiah and then walk out that will with reverence, joy and peace in the Ruach Hakodesh. If you seek Him and ask Him to lead you, He will do it. As long as your heart is where it’s supposed to be. Regardless, we must keep the Feasts of Yah in Spirit and in Truth. The particulars of how we  keep them is between Yah and you.

 Recommended Teaching on Passover

Recommend you check out Brother Robert Bills recent teaching on Pesach. (Messianic Teacher Robert Bills High Pursuit Ministry–Spirit and Truth Podcast and Webcast Program

 The Commandment to Consume Unleavened Bread

So getting back to the Feast of Unleavened Bread (which hits at sundown on 3/28 and runs to sundown on 4/4 this year), we are actually commanded to consume unleavened bread or matzah during these 7-days (Exo. 12:8-20; 13:6; 23:15; 34:18; Lev. 6:16; 23:6). Now, by this time of the holy week, we should have purged all leavened products from our homes before the Pesach meal hits. In so doing, our meals for the remainder of that holy week are to consist, in part, of unleavened bread, popularly known as matzah. Last week, I purchased a large box of matzah, and as we do each year during Unleavened Bread week, we incorporate into each meal during that week, matzah–in fact we consume matzah during that week for every meal in honor and in obedience to Yah’s commandments to do so.

 The Feast of Unleavened Bread an Opportunity for Self-Assessment and Spiritual Growth

And during this week of Unleavened Bread, we assess our walk with Mashiyach and ask Yah to reveal to us areas of our lives where sin besets us. The writer of Hebrews instructed his readers to “…strip off and throw aside every encumbrance (unnecessary weight) and that sin which so readily (deftly and cleverly) clings to and entangles us, and let us run with patient endurance and steady and active persistence the appointed course of the race that is set before us” (12:1). Indeed, the week of Unleavened Bread is a perfect time and opportunity to take assessment of the state of our walk in Messiah and seek, with the help of the Ruach HaKodesh, to do the very thing that the writer of Hebrews instructs.

 Keeping the Day of Firstfruits or Wave Sheaf Offering

Last, but not least, we have the rather obscure Day of First Fruits (Lev. 23:9-14). Shaul described Yahoshua as “the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:20). The firstfruits or wavesheaf offering was to take place within the week of Pesach-Unleavened Bread. It was a day intended for Yah’s people to offer unto YHVH the first of their spring harvest. Until they presented unto the Levitical Priests at the Tabernacle or Temple the first of their spring harvest in the form of a sheaf of barley to be waved before Yah in solemn acknowledgment of Yah’s sovereignty over our lives and over the work of their hands and their increase/income. They would not be permitted to consume any of their harvested grain or produce until after they’d presented an offering consisting of the firstfruits of their harvest to the Levitical Priests who would wave that offering before Yah on their behalf.

 We Begin the 50-Day Count to Pentecost–Shavuot

The other important aspect of the Day of Firstfruits which cannot be overlooked is that it is the day that we begin the 49-day count towards Shavuot or Pentecost. And the thing about Firstfruits is that the day on which it is kept by Yah’s people must always be correct and spot-on, otherwise Shauvout will be miscalculated and fall upon the wrong day on the calendar. And so it becomes important for Yah’s people to be fully aware of the days upon which Yah’s spring feasts occur in order that they keep Shavuot/Pentecost at its appointed time.

 

As it relates to us today, we honor the day of firstfruits, which depending on the calendar you follow, falls on the last day of Unleavened Bread this year, which is 4/4; doing good works and many of us will bless ministries that feed and nourish us with freewill offerings and such.

 Personal Reflections and Thoughts on the Spring Feasts

Now, I literally just scratched the surface as it relates to the Spring Feasts. I will tell you that there are a ton of excellent teachings out there that go into much greater detail than I have here. My intention was not to provide a thorough study of the Spring Feast; but rather, to give you somewhat of a broad brush overview and share with you some insights that I’ve gained in my years of keeping Yah’s feasts.

 

I simply love the feasts of Yah. I love everything about them. And I look forward each calendar year to not only keeping them and seeing what Yah wants me to do in keeping them, but also I look forward to the spiritual growth that naturally comes when we throw our whole selves into keeping these appointed, sacred times of Yah’s calendar year.

 As Yah’s Set-Apart People We Must Keep His Feasts

There’s no doubt about it friends: We are compelled to keep these feasts. We can try as we may to reason around not keeping them. And in our working around and trying to make up excuses why we can’t keep Yah’s set-apart days, we ultimately end up finding ourselves at odds with the Creator who from the beginning stipulated that His set-apart people must hear His voice, keep His Torah and His ways, which of course includes keeping His moedim–His set-apart days.

 

So let us keep Pesach-Unleavened Bread-Firstfruits with all the joy and reverence and anticipation we can muster and not let the world influence us otherwise. Like our ancient Hebrew cousins, we have been redeemed from those entities and things that have kept us in bondage. We no longer answer to those entities and things. For we have been redeemed and bought with a price; and oh what a price that was paid on our behalf (1 Cor. 6:20; 7:23).

 We Have Been Purchased with a Steep Price

Shaul instructed his readers, knowing the steep price that was paid on our behalf for our redemption, to glorify YHVH with our bodies. For our bodies have replaced the Temple and Tabernacle of old as Yah’s dwelling place (1 Cor. 3:16; 6:19)! Therefore, we have no excuse when it comes to our keeping Yah’s feasts. So, let’s keep His feasts with righteousness, peace and joy in the Ruach HaKodesh as we purge out the leaven and the old man and old woman, and walk in the newness of life.

 Looking Forward to Part 4 of the Paul on Being Under the Law Series

Yah willing, we’ll bring this series within a series to a much deserved close in our next installment. We will finally get to the point of interpreting and defining what Shaul meant by the phrase “under the Law.”

Have a blessed and meaningful Pesach-Unleavened Bread-and Firstfruits beloved.

A Call for Unity in the Body of Christ/Messiah

    By virtue of our role as disciples of Yahoshua Messiah (Jesus Christ), we are called to be a united and unified body of believers in every respect. Just as Master was united with His Father, we too must be united with the Father, our Master and with one...

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

When Tradition Eclipses Torah

  My Torah Portion Observation of the Week I was profoundly moved by the section of this week’s Torah portion that recorded what on the surface seemed the very harsh and violent encounter we had with YHVH. It was Parashah 26: Sh’mini, Eight and I wish to briefly...

Day of Firstfruits and Keeping the Sabbath Holy

    Keeping the Day of Firstfruits The Day of Firstfruits is a little known or publicized feast in our Faith Community. Firstfruits is also referred to as Yom haBikkurim (Hebrew) and the Wave Sheaf Offering. It is sandwiched into the week of...

Select Your Passover Lamb

I'm Reminded I’m reminded when looking over our copy of the Hebrew Observational Calendar that today is the day that we would select the unblemished animal of the first-year that would serve as our paschal lamb. Choosing a Lamb Today Certainly, today, the vast...

Torah Portions and the Body of Christ (Messiah)

My Love and Concern of Torah Portions I personally love the Torah Portions system for a number of reasons, including reasons associated with connecting with other like-minded Messianic believers who appreciate the Torah Portion system as well. Certainly, there are few...

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me..." (The Apostle Paul to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers) Well, I’m going to take a slight break from our series on the plurality of the Godhead series to tackle one of the Apostle Paul’s many difficult passages that the...